According to newspaper reports, the recent anthrax cases in the US are part of a germ warfare attack launched by terrorists. The news has sent many Americans into a panic. Soon after the anthrax attacks started in the US, reports of suspected biochemical assaults came out of a few European countries. Now, even Taiwan has discovered suspicious powder, which turned out to be a false alarm. Newspapers in Taiwan have used Chinese idioms to describe the alarm. Though hundreds or even thousands of years old, these idioms accurately describe the responses from people around the world today.
"The sound of the wind, the cry of the crane, bushes and trees all appear like soldiers" (風聲鶴唳、草木皆兵) describes the extreme insecurity of people who have survived a war. In the face of uncertainty, situations arise from one's own mind as extreme fears are projected onto animals, plants and even inanimate objects. In psychology, the wind, crane, bushes and trees are all called "trauma reminders." Sometimes, the agitation triggered by this sense of crisis can cause even more casualties than the real enemy.
Classical Chinese novels describe armies hastily retreating in the dark of night, in the mistaken belief that they are being pursued by the enemy. In the stampedes that follow, numerous soldiers trample each other and die. In real life, there have been many examples of massive casualties resulting from stampedes during fires at movie theaters or riots in soccer stadiums.
This is where the real potency of germ warfare lies. Anthrax is not just part of a biological war; it is part of a psychological war. The bacterium may only cause physical harm to a minute proportion of Americans, but it threatens the sense of security the vast majority feel. It puts a damper on their motivation to go to work, go to school, exercise, socialize or travel. It lowers the nation's productivity and the quality of people's lives. It destroys the trust people have built between themselves through mail, gifts, hugs and handshakes -- not to mention the massive cost of mobilizing police and soldiers to heighten security.
On Sept. 11, people throughout the world -- especially those who are sympathetic with US policy -- suffered a trauma not unlike that of New Yorkers when they saw two passenger jets slam into the World Trade Center. Their beliefs, assumptions and expectations of a "safe world" came under serious attack. Physiologically, this was accompanied by signs of over-alertness. In such circumstances, even milk powder placed on a civil airliner as a practical joke can become a reminder of the trauma.
When the external world becomes uncontrollable, when mail becomes unpredictable, a crisis of confidence develops in society. To maintain a sense of security, people must learn self-defense and step up safety checks. They have to live in a higher state of alert and fear.
Suspicions between organizations, states and ethnic groups have also deepened. Not only has the US had to increase checks on mail and transportation, but the UK is also carrying out anthrax checks on US citizens entering the country. The governments and citizens of the US and European countries have stepped up vigilance against central Asian immigrants and students as well as Muslims. This can create discrimination, leading people to vent their anger on innocent people and triggering a vicious cycle of wrongful treatment and hatred -- simply because people become each other's "trauma reminders." This shows the unimaginable after-effects of fighting violence with violence in the struggle between so-called terrorism and anti-terrorism.
Have politicians in Taiwan, who are very good at instigating public sentiment and hostility, learned anything from this?
Tony Huang is a mental health counselor based in Taipei.
Translated by Francis Huang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of