Can Taiwan's elections really be won by trickery? Why is it that, as soon as an election heats up, everyone tries to sully their opponent's reputation through innuendo, fact-twisting and vulgar personality attacks? Quite a few people in the KMT and the People First Party are fond of uttering the phrase "elections are temporary, friends are forever." But this, too, is simply subterfuge.
Since the people of Taiwan obtained the freedom of speech following the lifting of martial law, irresponsible politicians have abused their legislative immunity in the Legislative Yuan, wantonly engaging in malicious character assassination. For example, the legislative reform proposals made by former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) on behalf of the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU, 台聯) are closely aligned with what opinion polls show the people want. However, as soon as KMT candidates heard that Lee made the proposals, they started putting their spin on the issues through the pro-China media and taking every opportunity to try to embarrass Lee.
Another example is the brouhaha surrounding President Chen Shui-bian's (
Power transfers in most countries take place by means of a task force composed of members of both incoming and outgoing administrations. The incumbent leader usually has little to do personally with the process. Thus, if a problem like what Chen described occurred, it would seem that the first thing to do is ask the people who handled the transition about it. But opposition politicians have never let a little thing such as fact-checking stop them before -- so they were more than willing to pounce on Lee.
PFP Chairman James Soong (
What's so pathetic about the election process in Taiwan is that it has come to be defined by the public as simply a war of words between candidates that has little to do with everyday life. Such a contemptuous perspective stems from the fact that most candidates, as well as their parties, are unwilling to seriously examine the public's difficulties and come up with sound political policies, or to challenge other candidates' platforms based on fact rather than character assassination or to even to risk publicly debating their plans and views. Instead, they simply resort to the usual the tools of cowards -- rumor-mongering through the media.
However, the media must also share some of the blame for the ethical morass that is politics in Taiwan. The media should stop allowing itself to be used as a tool by candidates, stop the selective reporting of favorites and instead focus on providing a balanced assessment of the candidates, the parties and the issues.
Taiwan's political system has been characterized for too long by the charlatans and gangsters who have bought their way into the legislature and social respectability. Only by reforming the legislature and the legislative election system can the people of Taiwan at last have a political system worthy of their aspirations and responsive to their needs.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS