Can Taiwan's elections really be won by trickery? Why is it that, as soon as an election heats up, everyone tries to sully their opponent's reputation through innuendo, fact-twisting and vulgar personality attacks? Quite a few people in the KMT and the People First Party are fond of uttering the phrase "elections are temporary, friends are forever." But this, too, is simply subterfuge.
Since the people of Taiwan obtained the freedom of speech following the lifting of martial law, irresponsible politicians have abused their legislative immunity in the Legislative Yuan, wantonly engaging in malicious character assassination. For example, the legislative reform proposals made by former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) on behalf of the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU, 台聯) are closely aligned with what opinion polls show the people want. However, as soon as KMT candidates heard that Lee made the proposals, they started putting their spin on the issues through the pro-China media and taking every opportunity to try to embarrass Lee.
Another example is the brouhaha surrounding President Chen Shui-bian's (
Power transfers in most countries take place by means of a task force composed of members of both incoming and outgoing administrations. The incumbent leader usually has little to do personally with the process. Thus, if a problem like what Chen described occurred, it would seem that the first thing to do is ask the people who handled the transition about it. But opposition politicians have never let a little thing such as fact-checking stop them before -- so they were more than willing to pounce on Lee.
PFP Chairman James Soong (
What's so pathetic about the election process in Taiwan is that it has come to be defined by the public as simply a war of words between candidates that has little to do with everyday life. Such a contemptuous perspective stems from the fact that most candidates, as well as their parties, are unwilling to seriously examine the public's difficulties and come up with sound political policies, or to challenge other candidates' platforms based on fact rather than character assassination or to even to risk publicly debating their plans and views. Instead, they simply resort to the usual the tools of cowards -- rumor-mongering through the media.
However, the media must also share some of the blame for the ethical morass that is politics in Taiwan. The media should stop allowing itself to be used as a tool by candidates, stop the selective reporting of favorites and instead focus on providing a balanced assessment of the candidates, the parties and the issues.
Taiwan's political system has been characterized for too long by the charlatans and gangsters who have bought their way into the legislature and social respectability. Only by reforming the legislature and the legislative election system can the people of Taiwan at last have a political system worthy of their aspirations and responsive to their needs.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that
RSS