The APEC forum is currently the most significant international organization in which Taiwan participates, but only relatively low-level Taiwanese officials are allowed to attend its meetings. Only the economic minister and chairman of the Council for Economic Planning and Development are permitted to take part, while the nation's foreign affairs minister is forced to stay at home.
From 1993 to last year, all the "economies" hosting the APEC leaders' meeting invited Taiwan's leaders to participate. But, for various reasons, Taiwan's leaders always appointed special representatives to attend in their place.
This year however, China, in its capacity as host of this year's summit in Shanghai, did not follow the precedent of inviting Taiwan's leaders to attend the meeting. Meanwhile, it delayed until the last moment the announcement of its refusal to allow Taiwan's chosen representative Li Yuan-zu (
Taipei relaxed its "no haste, be patient" (戒急用忍) policy while China was undertaking large-scale military exercises on and around its Dongshan Island (東山島). Since the policy has been replaced by one of "active opening and effective management" (積極開放, 有效管理), the government should have been prepared to attend the summit on the basis of consistent strategic thinking and in accordance with the new policy.
Since Taipei decided not to attend, however, it seems inappropriate for it to hasten the relaxation of its China policy at a time when the Chinese government is intentionally discriminating against and seeking to suppress Taiwan. By slowing down dealings with cross-strait issues, Taipei risks falling more behind.
Taiwan has been forced by China to adopt the title "Chinese Taipei" (
When Taiwan sends a presidential representative to the summit, that representative is able to interact with the leaders of the other 20 APEC members and voice its point of view, which is different from that of China or Hong Kong. Thus, the summit serves as an extremely precious international stage for Taiwan.
Taiwan's envoy to the summit must, therefore, be well-versed in foreign languages, economics, politics and diplomacy, and also be well-known internationally as well. The president's envoy is the nation's representative. The envoy should be directly appointed by the president regardless of which party is in power, and the position of envoy should be a permanent one, not one that is changed every year or two.
The economy hosting an APEC summit must inform Beijing of the identity of Taipei's representative to the forum. In the face of a range of restrictions, Taiwan needs to prepare cautiously for APEC summits in order to "win a victory through unusual means" (出奇致勝), as the old Chinese saying goes.
The international community may soon forget the joint statement made at the summit on Oct. 22, but it will remember Taiwan's absence and the conflict between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Lin Cheng-yi is director of the Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS