The APEC forum is currently the most significant international organization in which Taiwan participates, but only relatively low-level Taiwanese officials are allowed to attend its meetings. Only the economic minister and chairman of the Council for Economic Planning and Development are permitted to take part, while the nation's foreign affairs minister is forced to stay at home.
From 1993 to last year, all the "economies" hosting the APEC leaders' meeting invited Taiwan's leaders to participate. But, for various reasons, Taiwan's leaders always appointed special representatives to attend in their place.
This year however, China, in its capacity as host of this year's summit in Shanghai, did not follow the precedent of inviting Taiwan's leaders to attend the meeting. Meanwhile, it delayed until the last moment the announcement of its refusal to allow Taiwan's chosen representative Li Yuan-zu (
Taipei relaxed its "no haste, be patient" (戒急用忍) policy while China was undertaking large-scale military exercises on and around its Dongshan Island (東山島). Since the policy has been replaced by one of "active opening and effective management" (積極開放, 有效管理), the government should have been prepared to attend the summit on the basis of consistent strategic thinking and in accordance with the new policy.
Since Taipei decided not to attend, however, it seems inappropriate for it to hasten the relaxation of its China policy at a time when the Chinese government is intentionally discriminating against and seeking to suppress Taiwan. By slowing down dealings with cross-strait issues, Taipei risks falling more behind.
Taiwan has been forced by China to adopt the title "Chinese Taipei" (
When Taiwan sends a presidential representative to the summit, that representative is able to interact with the leaders of the other 20 APEC members and voice its point of view, which is different from that of China or Hong Kong. Thus, the summit serves as an extremely precious international stage for Taiwan.
Taiwan's envoy to the summit must, therefore, be well-versed in foreign languages, economics, politics and diplomacy, and also be well-known internationally as well. The president's envoy is the nation's representative. The envoy should be directly appointed by the president regardless of which party is in power, and the position of envoy should be a permanent one, not one that is changed every year or two.
The economy hosting an APEC summit must inform Beijing of the identity of Taipei's representative to the forum. In the face of a range of restrictions, Taiwan needs to prepare cautiously for APEC summits in order to "win a victory through unusual means" (出奇致勝), as the old Chinese saying goes.
The international community may soon forget the joint statement made at the summit on Oct. 22, but it will remember Taiwan's absence and the conflict between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Lin Cheng-yi is director of the Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS