In his new book, to be released tomorrow, President Chen Shui-bian (
Yin Chung-wen (
Now the fracas seems to be snowballing, as opposition parties try to use this opportunity to drive a wedge between Chen and former president Lee Teng-hui (
How is such a wide gap possible between what the two sides understand to be a proper transfer of power? There are three possibilities. One, many important meetings and briefings may have been conducted informally in the Presidential Office, without passing through any other government agency. Some of those files may have been taken away as part of Lee's private property. Two, it could be that such files never existed. Much of the policymaking may have been done in secret, through face-to-face communication or hand-written notes. In this case, no minutes of any meeting would have been left behind. Three, it could also be that the files do exist, but problems in the way the records were made and filed kept people from finding them.
In the first scenario, the blame would go to the previous government, which should keep records of anything that has to do with national policy, no matter how secret, sensitive or informal they are. Such records are not private property and should not be taken from the Presidential Office.
In the second and third scenarios, the Presidential Office is at fault, apparently not knowing how to make, compile, file and store dossiers. There might be a need to boost the awareness of public officials on the need to keep important records, as well as the need for a good filing system.
In fact, part of the problem could be a lack of proper regulation. The NSC, initially an extra-legal entity, was recognized in the Constitution in 1994, but has never been regulated under law. As for the issue that Chen is particularly concerned about, ie, the "special state-to-state" model, a study was still being conducted under then NSC consultant Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) when Lee articulated the policy during an interview with the Voice of Germany radio station on July 9, 1999. The study has yet to be completed. Naturally, Chen wouldn't have seen files on the -- as yet -- unsettled policy.
The fact that Chen has written a book complaining of a lack of files 500 days after the transition is a sign of poor communications within the government. Yin is now a senior advisor to the president and works in the Presidential Office. Chen could have asked Yin about missing files at any time.
In Taiwan's first transition of political power, the lack of the dossier handover was not a major problem because many top government officials were not replaced at the time of the takeover, while others were simply replaced with officials from other government agencies. But this is no excuse for not setting up a proper system for the transition of power.
Now that the National Archives Law has been enacted, the government should work to set up regulations for implementation so that proper procedures for the disposition of important government documents is clearly spelled out and de-politicized.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS