In his new book, to be released tomorrow, President Chen Shui-bian (
Yin Chung-wen (
Now the fracas seems to be snowballing, as opposition parties try to use this opportunity to drive a wedge between Chen and former president Lee Teng-hui (
How is such a wide gap possible between what the two sides understand to be a proper transfer of power? There are three possibilities. One, many important meetings and briefings may have been conducted informally in the Presidential Office, without passing through any other government agency. Some of those files may have been taken away as part of Lee's private property. Two, it could be that such files never existed. Much of the policymaking may have been done in secret, through face-to-face communication or hand-written notes. In this case, no minutes of any meeting would have been left behind. Three, it could also be that the files do exist, but problems in the way the records were made and filed kept people from finding them.
In the first scenario, the blame would go to the previous government, which should keep records of anything that has to do with national policy, no matter how secret, sensitive or informal they are. Such records are not private property and should not be taken from the Presidential Office.
In the second and third scenarios, the Presidential Office is at fault, apparently not knowing how to make, compile, file and store dossiers. There might be a need to boost the awareness of public officials on the need to keep important records, as well as the need for a good filing system.
In fact, part of the problem could be a lack of proper regulation. The NSC, initially an extra-legal entity, was recognized in the Constitution in 1994, but has never been regulated under law. As for the issue that Chen is particularly concerned about, ie, the "special state-to-state" model, a study was still being conducted under then NSC consultant Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) when Lee articulated the policy during an interview with the Voice of Germany radio station on July 9, 1999. The study has yet to be completed. Naturally, Chen wouldn't have seen files on the -- as yet -- unsettled policy.
The fact that Chen has written a book complaining of a lack of files 500 days after the transition is a sign of poor communications within the government. Yin is now a senior advisor to the president and works in the Presidential Office. Chen could have asked Yin about missing files at any time.
In Taiwan's first transition of political power, the lack of the dossier handover was not a major problem because many top government officials were not replaced at the time of the takeover, while others were simply replaced with officials from other government agencies. But this is no excuse for not setting up a proper system for the transition of power.
Now that the National Archives Law has been enacted, the government should work to set up regulations for implementation so that proper procedures for the disposition of important government documents is clearly spelled out and de-politicized.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS