On Oct. 17, gunmen from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) assassinated Israeli Tourism Minister Rehavam Zeevi at a Jerusalem hotel. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon blamed Palestinian President Yasser Arafat for the killing, citing his failure to curb Palestinian terrorism. Arafat, in turn, condemned the assassination but held the Sharon government responsible, citing the provocative nature of its order to its military and intelligence agents to kill on the spot anyone suspected of attacking Israelis.
Ever since that order was given, the Israelis have killed 50 Palestinians, including Mustafa Zibri -- leader of the PFLP, the second-largest PLO faction -- on Aug. 27. The PFLP vowed to avenge Zibri's murder. In fact, the faction claimed responsibility for killing Zeevi. A vicious cycle of terrorist assassinations involving Israelis and Palestinians is underway.
On June 4, 1982, the Israeli ambassador to Britain, Shlomo Argov, was shot in London by Palestinians. Israeli troops, led by Sharon himself, took that murder as an excuse to attack Lebanon for harboring the organization responsible for the shooting. Though he might not be able to use Zeevi's death as an excuse to attack Arab countries, Sharon may send Israeli troops into autonomous Palestinian cities to hunt down suspects.
If that happens, the Sept. 26 Israeli-Palestinian ceasefire may not last. With the bloody Israeli-Palestinian conflict continuing, US diplomatic moves aimed at drawing Islamic countries to its side will definitely "require twice the effort to achieve half the result," as the old Chinese saying goes.
Meanwhile, anti-US and anti-Israel movements will continue to grow in the Islamic world, creating more difficulties for leaders of the Islamic countries that support the US military operations against Afghanistan.
If we are to be objective, the Sharon government's order is as much a terrorist act as the PFLP's assassination. It is an act of state terrorism. The US cannot have double standards -- it should oppose the terrorist acts of both sides equally. In view of the longstanding US support for Israel and the tremendous influence of the Jewish lobby within the US, however, it is most unlikely to do so.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has supported the US anti-terrorism policy, but hinted that Washington should also view anti-Russia movements within Chechnya as terrorist, including the pro-independence Chechen guer-rillas. China is supporting the US on the condition that pro-independence activists in Xinjiang be considered as terrorists. Moreover, on Oct. 17, US Secretary of State Colin Powell admitted in India, in exchange for New Dehli's support for the US anti-terrorism operations, that bombings by Kashmiri militants were indeed acts of terrorism.
The Islamic world will lose a great opportunity if it does not learn from Russia, China and India by requesting the US to stop the Israeli government's assassinations or demanding that the US define the assassinations as terrorist acts.
Sharon has recently voiced support for the establishment of a Palestinian state on the basis of the status quo. Such a proposal is unacceptable to the Palestinians. In fact, the US was not in favor of the establishment of a state of Palestine until the Sept. 11 attacks took place, which suggests that Washington has realized that terrorist atrocities are likely to continue if the Palestinian problem is not solved.
Sharon's proposed condi-tions, however, have shown that there is no hope for the establishment of a Palestinian state. That being so, the US will struggle to achieve its goal to wipe out terrorism worldwide.
David Chou is a professor of diplomacy at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
More than a week after Hondurans voted, the country still does not know who will be its next president. The Honduran National Electoral Council has not declared a winner, and the transmission of results has experienced repeated malfunctions that interrupted updates for almost 24 hours at times. The delay has become the second-longest post-electoral silence since the election of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez of the National Party in 2017, which was tainted by accusations of fraud. Once again, this has raised concerns among observers, civil society groups and the international community. The preliminary results remain close, but both
Beijing’s diplomatic tightening with Jakarta is not an isolated episode; it is a piece of a long-term strategy that realigns the prices of choices across the Indo-Pacific. The principle is simple. There is no need to impose an alliance if one can make a given trajectory convenient and the alternative costly. By tying Indonesia’s modernization to capital, technology and logistics corridors, and by obtaining in public the reaffirmation of the “one China” principle, Beijing builds a constraint that can be activated tomorrow on sensitive issues. The most sensitive is Taiwan. If we look at systemic constraints, the question is not whether
RSS