The irony underlying Pope John Paul's apology to China is simply too great. It is depressing that the head of one of the world's oldest and largest religious institutions and a personification of peace, love, sacrifice and the goodness of humanity appears to be kowtowing to a regime such as the PRC.
This is true even though the apology is confined to conduct of Catholic missionaries in China during the imperial era. People are reading a lot more than just a historical correction into this latest move by the Vatican.
China's media are already widely interpreting the apology as covering the pontiff's canonization last year of 120 martyrs killed between 1648 and 1930 in China for their faith. Beijing had angrily protested the canonizations, alleging that most of those 120 individuals were traitors during the colonial invasion of China in the Opium War and the Boxer Uprising. The fact that the canonization ceremony was conducted on Oct. 1, the PRC's national day, was taken as an added insult.
This interpretation has two very negative implications. First, it seriously undermines the credibility and authority of the Vatican, not to mention insulting the memory of those who were canonized. Secondly, it fans a Chinese nationalism that is already growing increasingly radical. While imperial China was certainly a victim of Western imperialism, the Communist regime has been using this painful era to incite a radical nationalism in order to safeguard its hold on power and justify China's rapid military expansion.
The papal apology is also being interpreted as a precursor to the establishment of diplomatic ties between the Vatican and Beijing. If that is the case, Taiwan will lose its last foothold in Europe -- since Beijing is demanding the Vatican first cut its diplomatic ties with Taiwan and acknowledge the "one China" principle before the establishment of formal ties between itself and the papal state.
If the Vatican does forsake Taipei for Beijing's friendship, it would be recognizing a government notorious for gross human rights violations, including forced abortions and restricting people's freedom to practice Catholicism or any other religion outside of the state-sanctioned venues.
Beijing only recognizes the Catholic Patriotic Church in China, a church that swears loyalty to the Communist Party of China and has its bishops appointed by the Communist regime. The government has repeatedly arrested and persecuted Catholic missionaries and ordinary believers of the underground church that continues to recognize the Pope. How would the Vatican face these individuals once it recognizes the Beijing regime? How would it face its followers in Taiwan?
In addition, the Vatican faces another hurdle in establishing diplomatic ties with Beijing. It would have to give up its right to nominate its own bishops in the PRC. There is no way Beijing will budge on this issue since the Communist Party believes that it should be the supreme ruler of the country. It is unlikely to give any organized religion the opportunity to challenge its authority. Therefore, it will only accept institutions willing to succumb to its control, such as by accepting its appointment of bishops in the case of the Catholic Church. This explains the government's crackdown on the Falun Gong.
Should the Vatican ever decide to establish diplomatic ties with the PRC, its motivation must be based on some very noble intention, such as helping the Chinese people obtain their religious freedom, among other human rights. However, China has already warned the Vatican that it should not "interfere with the internal affairs of China under the pretext of religion."
Under these circumstances, the bad certainly outweighs any good -- by a large measure -- in any attempt by the Vatican to establish diplomatic relations with Beijing.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS