The irony underlying Pope John Paul's apology to China is simply too great. It is depressing that the head of one of the world's oldest and largest religious institutions and a personification of peace, love, sacrifice and the goodness of humanity appears to be kowtowing to a regime such as the PRC.
This is true even though the apology is confined to conduct of Catholic missionaries in China during the imperial era. People are reading a lot more than just a historical correction into this latest move by the Vatican.
China's media are already widely interpreting the apology as covering the pontiff's canonization last year of 120 martyrs killed between 1648 and 1930 in China for their faith. Beijing had angrily protested the canonizations, alleging that most of those 120 individuals were traitors during the colonial invasion of China in the Opium War and the Boxer Uprising. The fact that the canonization ceremony was conducted on Oct. 1, the PRC's national day, was taken as an added insult.
This interpretation has two very negative implications. First, it seriously undermines the credibility and authority of the Vatican, not to mention insulting the memory of those who were canonized. Secondly, it fans a Chinese nationalism that is already growing increasingly radical. While imperial China was certainly a victim of Western imperialism, the Communist regime has been using this painful era to incite a radical nationalism in order to safeguard its hold on power and justify China's rapid military expansion.
The papal apology is also being interpreted as a precursor to the establishment of diplomatic ties between the Vatican and Beijing. If that is the case, Taiwan will lose its last foothold in Europe -- since Beijing is demanding the Vatican first cut its diplomatic ties with Taiwan and acknowledge the "one China" principle before the establishment of formal ties between itself and the papal state.
If the Vatican does forsake Taipei for Beijing's friendship, it would be recognizing a government notorious for gross human rights violations, including forced abortions and restricting people's freedom to practice Catholicism or any other religion outside of the state-sanctioned venues.
Beijing only recognizes the Catholic Patriotic Church in China, a church that swears loyalty to the Communist Party of China and has its bishops appointed by the Communist regime. The government has repeatedly arrested and persecuted Catholic missionaries and ordinary believers of the underground church that continues to recognize the Pope. How would the Vatican face these individuals once it recognizes the Beijing regime? How would it face its followers in Taiwan?
In addition, the Vatican faces another hurdle in establishing diplomatic ties with Beijing. It would have to give up its right to nominate its own bishops in the PRC. There is no way Beijing will budge on this issue since the Communist Party believes that it should be the supreme ruler of the country. It is unlikely to give any organized religion the opportunity to challenge its authority. Therefore, it will only accept institutions willing to succumb to its control, such as by accepting its appointment of bishops in the case of the Catholic Church. This explains the government's crackdown on the Falun Gong.
Should the Vatican ever decide to establish diplomatic ties with the PRC, its motivation must be based on some very noble intention, such as helping the Chinese people obtain their religious freedom, among other human rights. However, China has already warned the Vatican that it should not "interfere with the internal affairs of China under the pretext of religion."
Under these circumstances, the bad certainly outweighs any good -- by a large measure -- in any attempt by the Vatican to establish diplomatic relations with Beijing.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS