Among the ethnic groups living together on Taiwan, the Minnan (
Some scholars believe that the Minnan and Hakka have common ancestral records. Their cultures are closely related, their beliefs are similar and they are most likely the same ethnic group. These scholars say that the two groups' linguistic differences are due to their having been Sinicized in different eras and having originated from different branches of the ancestral tribe.
There are also scholars, however, who believe that the Hakka originated from a pure race of Han people that migrated south from the Central Plains to avoid the turmoil of war. They believe that the Hakka and the Minnan are different ethnic groups.
Recently, Dr. Lin Ma-li (林媽利) of the blood transfusion medical research laboratory at Mackay Memorial Hospital, worked on a joint research project with the Japanese Red Cross Society Blood Center and the human genetics research laboratory at Tokyo University. Taking human leukocyte antigen (HLA) as the basic material for their research, they discovered that the Minnan and Hakka people are both descendants of the ancient Yue (
Actually, if we observe both the cultural differences and similarities between the two, it isn't difficult to realize that they are indeed one ethnic group. Lin's research report serves as conclusive proof.
First, from among nearly 1,000 genealogies of Taiwan families collected by the Taiwan Surname Association (
Second, their two languages are similar. According to Deng Xiaohua (
The reason for differences in the pronunciation of the Minnan and Hakka languages is that different Yue people became Sinicized in different eras [the many branches of the Yue are known as the "100 Yue" (
Third, the Minnan and Hakka both bury their dead twice (many ethnic groups south of the Yangtze river do). Even now, we can still find "hanging coffins" and caves containing bones in clay urns -- dating back to thousands of years, long before the supposed migration occurred -- in mountainous areas all over Fujian.
The popular explanation for this is that when our ancestors migrated south to Fujian and Guangdong from the central plains in order to escape turmoil, they instructed their descendants to bring their remains back to the central plains for burial in peaceful times so that they might realize their wish of "fallen leaves returning to their roots." This is just nationalistic talk from the imperial era. In fact, the Han people of the central plains have no custom of burying their dead twice.
Fourth, according to historical records, the peoples of Fujian and Guangdong had already started to become Sinicized in the Qin and Han dynasties. Later, when Chen Yuanguang (
Afterwards, they were proud to be Tang Chinese. For over a thousand years, wherever they have gone, they called themselves Tang people (唐人), from the region of Tang mountain.
People from Tang mountain discriminate against those from the central plains. They call people from other provinces "northern barbarians." People still use this term today in Xiamen, Zhangzhou and Quanzhou.
Fifth, the Minnan and Hakka both worship gods and offer sacrifices to ghosts. Their customs, beliefs and rituals to mark important family occasions are all very similar. The differences in their customs, however, with those of the people from the central plains, however, are great.
Sixth, the Hakka are mostly distributed in the mountainous region between Fujian, Guangdong and Jiangxi. The land is barren and the people are poor, so they followed the Jiulong River or the Han River and move toward the richer, more populous coastal region.
After moving to the coast, they learned to speak the local Minnan language, and in the transitional areas between Minnan language regions and Hakka language regions, they speak Zhaoan Hakka (
According to Taiwan Surname Association statistics, the Hakka population is no smaller than that of Minnan. It is just that most Hakka no longer speak their own language. Former president Lee Teng-hui's (
The above points show that the Minnan and Hakka are in fact the same. But in our society, some people insist that Hakka have a "headstrong" character, citing the example that Hakka women did not bind their feet and the families put a great emphasis on work and study. These are unconvincing arguments because in a difficult environment, those so-called special characteristics would appear among any ethnic group.
In sum, from the differences and similarities between the Minnan and Hakka cultures, as well as Lin's scientific research report, there is no longer any doubt that the two groups are the same people.
The classification of the Minnan and Hakka as separate groups among the four major ethnic groups that we speak of in Taiwan society has triggered animosity. This is unfortunate. Some people believe that it was done intentionally as a way of dividing the people of Taiwan. Whether or not this is true, I would like to say that the government need not get involved in Minnan versus Hakka disputes. It is even less necessary to establish a Hakka committee in the Executive Yuan. Would such a committee be responsible just for the 200,000 people who can speak only Hakka, or also for the 12,000,000 Taiwanese who have Hakka ancestors but can't speak the language?
Lin Yao-chi is a board member of the Taiwan Surname Association.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS