Since the government came to power last year, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has received different evaluations of his policymaking methods and styles. Even DPP members, including Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮), have made repeated complaints. For that reason, following the dispute over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, a nine-member task force was established to bring together opinions from the Presidential Office, the Executive Yuan, DPP headquarters and the party's legislative caucus.
The task force was intended to pool collective wisdom and develop coordination. After several months, however, the task force has obviously failed to meet those original expectations, and its very orientation and functions are thought to be in need of reconsideration.
In the existing constitutional framework, the Executive Yuan is the highest administrative body. The president need not, indeed should not, assume sole responsibility for all policies. Even when the president has to deal with crucial national security issues, he can consult the National Security Council (
The root of the problem lies in the Constitution. If politicians do not abide by the established constitutional structure or policymaking system, they will still mess things up even if the task force is restructured.
The second problem is Chen's character. If he cannot change his style of "one-man policymaking," any decision-making or coordinating groups will be reduced to "a group to be notified" or "a rubber-stamp group."
Thirdly, Chen should acknowledge the functions of political parties. He must have known that he could not transcend or withdraw from party activities after assuming the presidency. Instead, he should show leadership toward the arties, and take advantage of their functions to coordinate the executive and legislative branches, as well as to build communication channels between the ruling and opposition parties.
Of course, beginners need time to learn, but Chen has been in office for around 10 months. When making important national policy decisions, Chen should learn to listen to all sides and take into consideration advice made in good faith, communicate and coordinate among different groups, and make final decisions with the utmost care. Chen shoulders the keen expectations of the Taiwanese people. He should conduct a sincere examination of his government's approach to policy-making, starting with a self-critique.
Wang Yeh-lih is chairman of the political science department at Tunghai University.
Translated by Jackie Lin
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS