Since the government came to power last year, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has received different evaluations of his policymaking methods and styles. Even DPP members, including Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮), have made repeated complaints. For that reason, following the dispute over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, a nine-member task force was established to bring together opinions from the Presidential Office, the Executive Yuan, DPP headquarters and the party's legislative caucus.
The task force was intended to pool collective wisdom and develop coordination. After several months, however, the task force has obviously failed to meet those original expectations, and its very orientation and functions are thought to be in need of reconsideration.
In the existing constitutional framework, the Executive Yuan is the highest administrative body. The president need not, indeed should not, assume sole responsibility for all policies. Even when the president has to deal with crucial national security issues, he can consult the National Security Council (
The root of the problem lies in the Constitution. If politicians do not abide by the established constitutional structure or policymaking system, they will still mess things up even if the task force is restructured.
The second problem is Chen's character. If he cannot change his style of "one-man policymaking," any decision-making or coordinating groups will be reduced to "a group to be notified" or "a rubber-stamp group."
Thirdly, Chen should acknowledge the functions of political parties. He must have known that he could not transcend or withdraw from party activities after assuming the presidency. Instead, he should show leadership toward the arties, and take advantage of their functions to coordinate the executive and legislative branches, as well as to build communication channels between the ruling and opposition parties.
Of course, beginners need time to learn, but Chen has been in office for around 10 months. When making important national policy decisions, Chen should learn to listen to all sides and take into consideration advice made in good faith, communicate and coordinate among different groups, and make final decisions with the utmost care. Chen shoulders the keen expectations of the Taiwanese people. He should conduct a sincere examination of his government's approach to policy-making, starting with a self-critique.
Wang Yeh-lih is chairman of the political science department at Tunghai University.
Translated by Jackie Lin
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS