In late January the presidents, vice presidents and deans of nine top US universities, along with 25 female professors, held a conference at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) to discuss the equitable treatment of women in science and engineer-ing. Afterwards, representatives of the universities signed a joint statement and agreed to work within their institutions toward four goals.
Those were: One, to analyze the salaries and the proportion of university resources provided to women. Two, to work toward a faculty that reflects the diversity of the student body. Three, to reconvene in a year to share the specific initiatives undertaken to achieve these objectives. Four, to recognize that this challenge will require significant review of, and changes to, the procedures within each university and within the scientific and engineering establishments as a whole.
This appeal, made by the heads of top universities, has resonated far and wide at other US schools. It has also swept away the anguish and worry aroused by wage inequality for women at MIT.
What moves one deeply is that although most of the administrators who attended the conference were male, discussion focused on four matters: What are the issues in your institutions and the successful or failed strategies you have pursued? What are the systemic causes of the problems we face? What new actions could each institution take? What might we do collectively?
In the US there are more and more talented female students and teachers studying or teaching at top universities. Male students and faculty in these universities are glad to see women strive for further improvement and are proud of women's achievements. Take Harvard Medical School for example. It posts the significant achievements of female graduates outside the classrooms, a practice which is in line with late Beijing University (
I remember that after one of my university classmates, who is now married with children, received her master's degree in civil engineering from the University of California, Berkeley, her school adviser called her every year for almost 10 years to urge her to pursue a PhD -- until the year before he retired. After-wards, he frequently passed work opportunities to her, encouraging her all the time to take on greater challenges. His intention to treasure female talent was admirable.
Every successful woman in today's world has usually benefited from the encouragement and support of her family, teachers and friends -- so that she could march forward courageously. After all, when women are striving for higher goals, they are often challenged by traditional social values, vicious competition from men and an unfair system as well. Such challenges can hardly be understood by men, who can freely utilize their talents.
The only real difference between the sexes is in the chromosomes. Because women are patient, considerate, able to make careful observations, attentive and have strong will and the capacity for self-reflection -- they often make greater contributions to society than men while taking relatively more idealistic professions. According to Women Administrators in Higher Education, recently published by the State University of New York Press, because of their high sense of mission, women university presidents and administrators throughout the history of US higher education have usually made extraordinary contributions to their communities and have encouraged students to pay attention to human welfare issues. Consequently, male presidents and administrators now look at them with new eyes and male students and teachers in their schools also tend to assist female students and teachers more willingly.
In Taiwan, however, the number of female graduate students is much lower than that of female undergraduates. Many women's talents are often stifled and wasted, or they are torn between their commitment to their families and that to their supervisors. Some male managers seldom accept female professionals' points of view. No wonder many women teachers and doctors face difficulties being promoted. The situation is even worse in areas where education and social and economic standards are lower.
More discussion and promotion -- regarding cultivation of young female talent, women's health and communication between men and women -- is needed. We should enable women, with their outstanding intelligence, talent and enthusiasm, to continuously contribute to society. Finally, I'd like to show my sincere appreciation by dedicating this article to all gentlemen who have encouraged and promoted women in the past.
King Chwan-chuen is a professor in the College of Public Health, National Taiwan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS