Many of Taiwan's politicians have watched the movie 13 Days recently, but perhaps none of them have read the book Thirteen Days: A Memoir of the Cuban Missile Crisis, written by Robert F. Kennedy. If they are willing to spend some time reading the book after seeing the movie, they will be able to learn something more.
The Cuban missile crisis occurred almost 40 years ago, and there are innumerable books recording this piece of history. The most factual is definitely Thirteen Days, written by the younger brother of late US president John F. Kennedy. Meanwhile, the one that gives the most comprehensive analysis is Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis by Graham T. Allison of Harvard University. Both books are classics.
Regardless of whether Taiwan's politicians prefer to learn from the movie or from the books, what they need to learn the most from the missile crisis is President Kennedy's policy-making model, especially his methods of crisis management.
Although Kennedy and his confidantes were preeminent figures, they sustained a crushing defeat in the Bay of Pigs incident. When reviewing the matter, they found that the failure mainly resulted from an inappropriate policy-making model, especially because no objections were raised during the decision-making process.
Therefore, when handling the missile crisis, Kennedy completely changed his policy-making style. Some of the most distinguished characteristics are as follows:
First, although Kennedy organized a crisis committee, he avoided presiding over meetings for fear that those holding opposing opinions might hesitate to challenge his viewpoints or refrain from debating their ideas too vigorously.
Second, with or without his presence, all of those involved in policy-making discussions were viewed as equals, regardless of rank or authority.
Third, the Bay of Pigs incident failed because all agreed unanimously, despite whatever difference of opinion they might have had in the policy-making process. However, facing the missile crisis, Kennedy not only made the pro-war members and "doves" challenge each other to correct the other side's posi-tions, but also had a senior Republican act as the "Devil's advocate" to deliberately put forth opposing viewpoints.
Although many factors contributed to the peaceful end of the Cuban missile crisis, Kennedy's policy-making model was undoubtedly the key point. The model does not offer brilliant insights, but it is easier said than done. Heads of states around the world who can actually practice Kennedy's style are few and far between.
In fact, during the 13 days of the missile crisis, Kennedy also read a book to learn how to run a country. The book he read was The Guns of August by historian Barbara W. Tuchman.
In the book, Tuchman says that World War I was triggered by misjudgments and misunderstandings. Tuchman argues that it could have been stopped but was not. During the missile crisis, Kennedy often cited the book as an example and took World War I as a reference point. He said he did not want to make the wrong decisions and later be criticized by historians in a book titled "The Missiles of October."
Leaders of Taiwan's political parties have rarely thought about policy-making models. Even when they do, they are not above one-man or oligarchic policy-making patterns. The so-called collective decision-making model exists in name only. If they can learn a smattering from Kennedy's handling of the 13-day crisis, Taiwan politics would certainly be greatly benefitted.
Wang Chien-chuang is president of The Journalist magazine.
Translated by Jackie Lin
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS