The movie 13 Days was adapted from the book The Kennedy Tapes: Inside the White House During the Cuban Missile Crisis, published in 1998 and based on authentic meeting tapes. The drama also draws material from news reports of that time, scholars' analyses, interviews with related persons and CIA documents. Time magazine ranks it as one of the top 10 movies of the year and the content of the film has been described as a political textbook. In US political circles and the military, many regard it as a must-see and the UN also gave a viewing of it during a seminar.
The film tells the story of 13 days in 1962, when US president John F. Kennedy, facing a peace-war dilemma, had to solve the Cuban Missile Crisis and safeguard US national security. The young president and his team kept their composure, exercised flexible diplomacy and held firm to the principle of peace, thus finally solving the crisis, which had the potential to trigger a third world war.
After watching the film, Vice President Annette Lu (
The similarities between the two presidents are as follows. First, both leaders overcame their opponents by a small margin and assumed presidency at a relatively young age. Kennedy defeated rival Richard Nixon -- who had been widely tipped to win -- in the 1960 US presidential election by a margin of less than one percent. Last year, in the closely fought election in Taiwan, Chen's victory over James Soong (宋楚瑜) was by the narrow margin of three percent.
Second, their aides are mostly young "boy scouts." Third, both of them face the threat of missile deployment by communists across a strait -- although the missiles are of different types. Lastly, both of their governments have "disobedient people" plotting conspiracies.
Given such similarities, Chen should learn from Kennedy how to handle a crisis and show courage and insight while under enormous pressure, instead of dealing with the crisis with self-willed approaches. Chen should also learn from Kennedy how to implement policies on national security. In addition, Kennedy's determination to hold firm to the principle of peace and not easily go to war also deserves emulation by Chen.
In terms of traditional concepts on strategy, safeguarding national security relies, to a certain degree, on armed strength, but the survival of a country cannot solely depend on arms procurement when we face the menace from across the Strait -- not to mention the fact that most of Taiwan's weapons are purchased from other countries. Chen also said the other day, "Permanent peace in the ROC and the Taiwan Strait cannot rely merely on a military build-up, but on security on other levels as well." Therefore, Chen may even preempt the possibility of a similar crisis before it takes shape.
Although most people think that the cards are not in our hands in this cross-strait game, more goodwill and friendly policies will be conducive to communication and understanding between the people across the Strait. Dissolving the motives for using military force "from the bottom up" will be an alternative to a traditional arms race.
Even though 13 Days is a good film, we hope this type of breathtaking drama will never be played out in Taiwan.
Ho Sheng-fei is a graduate student in the school of journalism at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS