Ever since the rise of multinational corporations in the 1960s, many have loudly proclaimed the motto "businessmen have no mother countries" (
Little do they know that the slogan was propaganda dreamed up by major international capitalists to help them expand their businesses to all corners of the world. The motto was intended to avoid accusations of economic invasion by those leaning toward left-wing factions during the Cold War era. It resembled communist slogans like "workers have no mother countries" and "proletarians of the world unite" in that they were all politically motivated.
According to Vice Chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council Chen Ming-tung (
We believe that Taiwanese businesses' relocation to China or establishment of branch offices in China must be based on sound business needs. Otherwise, why bring business resources to the Chinese market where the companies are unfamiliar with the social environment and the legal system is primitive? China should not be seen as some wonder drug to cure business problems. Times will be even tougher for those who venture into China just to follow the pack. Without well-though-out plans, failures are bound to follow, creating even more business crises and security risks.
Actually, many businessmen investing in China share one sentiment -- there may be ample opportunities in China, but there is no money to be made. Taiwanese businesses do not measure up to other multinational corporations in the Chinese market in terms of their understanding of market conditions, capital, technologies and distribution. Therefore, many Taiwanese businesses rely on connections to win contracts. This means, of course, additional costs for Taiwanese businessmen.
A closer examination reveals that many Taiwanese businessmen doing miraculously well in China rely on illegal means such as tax evasion or tax fraud. These practices do not warrant our envy. Ill-gotten gains only help to form barriers for legitimate long-term business development. Asia learned this lesson the hard way after the 1997 financial crisis. Having businesses feed on special perks and privileges is akin to becoming addicted to opium. The companies will gradually lose competitiveness, destroying their future as a result.
All slogans like "businessmen have no mother countries" sung by the major international corporations are backed by powerful political powers. Before Taiwanese companies march into China en masse, they need to make pragmatic evaluations in accordance with their own needs and work closely with the relevant government agencies, so as to ensure these businessmen's political rights won't be trampled upon by the Chinese government. Do not be fooled by China's unificationist propaganda or sing along with the absurd tunes Beijing plays. Do not cast away your real "mother country." This is how you protect your long-term interests.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS