In the ocean of politics, every politician in Taiwan used to be portrayed as a "good fish" by local media -- not only when the Chiang
This was as much a political as a media phenomenon, as all published news related to politicians had to be good news. Any magazine that dared to reveal politicians' darker sides risked being banned by the intelligence agencies. Any negative news that was published was deliberately spread under the authorization of top government officials as a way of punishing one person in order to warn others.
All politicians were well-protected in the past. The media was just like their dressing tables and they even provided free cosmetics so that each politician could look attractive. Thus, the rulers would try to portray their domination in a favorable light, and no attacks on the government were allowed. Today, by contrast, anyone who goes into politics places himself right next to the volcano and can expect to be burned.
Academia Sinica President Lee Yuan-tseh (李遠哲), a Nobel laureate, was savaged when he supported DPP presidential candidate Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) in last year's election. After the distinguished writer Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) was invited by Taipei City Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to head the city's Cultural Affairs Bureau, she was, labeled a right-wing politician. Senior adviser to the president Shi Wen-lung (許文龍) used to be portrayed as a successful, cultured, businessman. When, in the past, he called on the government to cut its budget, the local media respectfully echoed his words. Not long after he openly supported Lee and Chen, however, he began to be attacked repeatedly. The recent controversy over comfort women has almost destroyed his image entirely. Even DPP legislators have criticized and insulted him heartlessly for his remarks.
Let's get to the root of the problem. People in Taiwan still cannot transcend the ethnic divide. Due to their hostility towards each other, when people from the pro-China camp heard Shi's words -- that comfort women became sex slaves voluntarily -- they were not willing to listen to his explanation. Shi might have over-generalized, by only citing his neighbor's experience of becoming a comfort woman. On the other hand, can the Taipei Women's Rescue Foundation's (
The pro-unification and pro-independence camps should try to understand and to communicate with each other instead of adding fuel to the fire. Unfortunately, politicians still support nationalism and look down on the special connections to Japan that some elderly people in Taiwan still have.
There are those people in Taiwan who have always considered themselves Chinese. They always use nationalism as a weapon to brutally destroy those who disagree with them. None of us knows how the conflicts between the two camps will eventually end. At least, however, we should allow people with different loyalties to reveal their feelings, their experiences and their thoughts. People should not be despised for speaking sincerely. Meanwhile, the media should stick to their most important task of exposing the faults of the government, instead of dancing along with nationalism.
If the media can do so, less harm will be caused to Taiwan's elite, and more community leaders will participate in politics, so that we can avoid a situation in which the bad outnumber the good.
Chen Ro-jinn is a freelance writer.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS