President Chen Shui-bian
While we applaud Chen's determination to uphold this principle, we think he may be confusing the issue. The sanctity of free speech is wholeheartedly embraced by this paper. On these grounds, although we disagree with the content of On Taiwan, we oppose a ban on Kobayashi's visiting Taiwan. For the same reason, we think Shi and King have the right to state their views on comfort women, especially now they have clarified they were speaking strictly about certain comfort women they knew, rather than all comfort women in general.
However, King's statement on a television talk show regarding the Republic of China is an entirely different story. We believe that King's open denial of the legitimacy of the ROC -- saying she does not recognize it -- is inappropriate. Free speech is not an issue here. What is at stake is the government's political accountability toward its people.
While King, a longtime supporter of Taiwan independence, was right about "the right of the people to revolt," she must not forget the "ROC on Taiwan" has -- through democratization -- become a government derived from the consent and free will of the people to whom it owes political accountability. How can our government be politically accountable when its members do not even concede the government's legitimacy? Had King been an ordinary citizen, rather than a member of the government, she would be free to make such a statement. But she is not.
If King simply finds the name "ROC" unacceptable and would like to advocate a change of name, then she should clarify her position. So far, she has given the impression that she is against the "ROC" government in Taiwan, rather than just the name.
In any event, what is in a name? What matters is the substantive state sovereignty that Taiwan enjoys. Once she accepts that Taiwan is the "ROC," then she should not find it so hard to accept the name "Republic of China."
Based on what we know about King, she does appear to love Taiwan dearly. Both King and her husband were banned from returning to Taiwan for several decades, because of their involvement, in Japan, with the Taiwan independence movement. In the post-martial law era, King has continued to work on improving relations between Japan and Taiwan. She also donated NT$2 million to the government to help out with the disaster relief after the 921 quake.
We call on King, out of her love for Taiwan, to do the right thing -- either retract her statement or resign as presidential advisor. Her remarks have made the Chen administration's already-difficult position even worse. The controversy is fanning up strife between ethnic Taiwanese and mainlanders. The controversy over On Taiwan has dragged on long enough. Let us put an end to it. Taiwan's young democracy cannot endure it much longer.
Finally, we also warn opposition lawmakers against using a double standard. Demand no less of their own speech than they do of King. The personal insults and groundless accusations they make, both inside the legislature and out, make a mockery out of a cherished freedom.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS