The mentality of the people of Taiwan is quite complex, as the population is divided by generations, social groups and educational backgrounds.
The complexity is best represented in the huge gap between "benshengren"
Living in Taiwan, I come across this complexity everyday. But recently I discovered that there is a big gap among the Japanese in terms of their understanding of Taiwan. The issue emerged from a column of mine where I made reference to the view that Chen Shui-bien
According to the person who made this claim, Taiwan and China will be united due to the pattern of Chinese history and a saying from the Romance of the Three Kingdoms -- "those who are separated for a long time will always be united and those who are united for a long time will always be separated."
What surprised me was that it was not a "waishengren" who had such a deep consciousness of Chinese history, but a "bensheng-ren." Benshengrens, who experienced Japanese colonial rule, usually have strong feelings of resentment against China and are less likely to believe in unification. The person who came up with the idea, however, is a history specialist who believes that history repeats itself. He said that many people, including himself, hope Taiwan stays as it is. Nevertheless, he says the future of Taiwan is gloomy when viewed from the perspective of Chinese history.
A short-term dynasty has always been followed by a long-lived one. Take the case of the short-lived Sui, which was succeeded by the long-reigning Tang Dynasty. Long-term reigns normally last for about 200 years. Therefore, a short term governance of the ROC will be followed by one by the PRC, which will last for more than 200 years.
In its history, Taiwan has experienced a variety of rulers, from Dutch colonization, a refugee government of Cheng Cheng-kung
I expected to receive a lot of criticism for my column, since this idea runs counter to that of the pro-independence group in Taiwan, who became even more influential after the birth of Chen's government. Contrary to my expectations, however, the criticism came from the Japanese. One Japanese resident of Taiwan said "history will not repeat itself" and "the idea of Chen being the last president is impossible." A lively debate ensued.
I found other Japanese who showed interest in the topic and realized as a result of all of this feedback, that Taiwan's future is of substantial concern among the Japanese who are connected to Taiwan in one way or another.
Many Japanese people residing in Taiwan, including myself, receive a lot of help from benshengren , who are fluent in Japanese. We often hear them complain about waishengren and China, while they appear to cherish Japan.
It was inevitable that the Japanese would become sympathetic to the benshengren and unsympathetic to China and the waishengren. We consequently came to a short-sighted conclusion that KMT rule after the war was terrible and Japanese colonization of Taiwan was good.
An experienced Japanese journalist once said "it is understandable that older benshengren praise Japan. But it is not the place of the Japanese to exaggerate that sentiment." His words can serve as a warning to the Japanese not to justify Japan's occupation by taking advantage of positive sentiments toward Japan among the older generation benshengren, which have been nurtured throughout post-war Taiwanese history.
My point is that not all older benshengren hold pro-independence sentiments. Taiwan is a very complex nation and there is no one solid sentiment held by the general public. If the Japanese talk about Taiwan, sharing only superficial information about the society, the conversation will not proceed too far. I believe it is more worthwhile to talk to as many Taiwanese people as possible in order to understand Taiwan and its peoples.
Takefumi Hayada is the publisher of Taiwan Tsushin (台灣通信).
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has created a dilemma that could soon cause him to be hoisted with his own petard, bringing his leadership of China to an end. His threatening rhetoric over the unification of Taiwan with China, in which he has said, “we are willing to draw blood if necessary,” has placed Xi in a corner. Xi is portrayed as a strong world leader, yet he has created a scenario for himself that most likely would have an unfavorable outcome. With the 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) scheduled to convene this month, Xi cannot
I was privileged to meet with many of Taiwan’s leaders and leading thinkers during a study tour visit in August. One theme I heard several times during that trip was that bad relations between the United States and China benefit Taiwan. At first thought, I empathize with the argument. After all, there is a troubling record of America’s leaders negotiating with Beijing over the heads of Taiwan’s leaders. For example, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt returned Taiwan to China after World War II. President Richard Nixon surprised Taiwan leaders with his 1972 trip to China. President Jimmy Carter unilaterally chose to normalize
Washington’s “one China” policy has not changed and the US does not take a position on Taiwan’s sovereignty issue, a US Department of State spokesperson has said. He said that this has been the principle of US policy toward Taiwan since 1979, and the policy has remained in effect. He also said that US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has privately made this clear to Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅). The US’ “one China” policy and China’s “one China” principle recognize China as the “representative of China.” The two diverge on the issue of Taiwan: Beijing asserts sovereignty
I live in Taiwan because, like many foreigners, I fell in love with and chose to align my life with a Taiwanese. In an era where personal freedoms are mandatorily ceded to government decree, I am thankful to the Taiwanese government for the spousal visa, as well as the lack of demeaning bureaucratic hoops and hurdles needed to get a work permit, residency permit and healthcare. However, if I then choose to attempt citizenship, this enlightened attitude spasms to seizure, culminating in what appears to be blatant xenophobia. In contrast to Western countries, the path to citizenship mandates a protracted period