Fri, Jul 07, 2000 page12

• Are national security rules secure?

  • By Lee Ching-hsiung 李慶雄
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Shortly after his retirement from the National Security Bureau (NSB), Major General Pan Hsi-hsien (潘希賢), the bureau's former personnel chief, left Taiwan to take up a position in China with the subsidiary of a Taiwanese firm. Initially, the incident merely exposed the flaws in implementing Taiwan's national security measures. However, Pan's detainment by Beijing authorities has highlighted the safety problems facing Taiwanese businessmen in China.

  Over time, the Chinese government has gotten into the practice of labeling Taiwan businessmen as "Taiwanese spies" to justify its invasion of these individuals' personal liberty and safety. The return of Pan appears especially urgent, in view of this emerging practice.

  Reportedly, Pan told the media that he had "erroneously entered the bandit-region" (誤入匪區) because he was unfamiliar with Taiwan's relevant laws and restrictions. How is it possible that a senior NSB official, in particular a personnel supervisor, could be ignorant of the legal prohibition against administrative and intelligence officials going to China within three years of their leaving such sensitive jobs?

  Pan's account is hardly believable. In reality, the restrictions are virtually unenforceable and have become nothing more than a basis for appeals to an indivi-dual's conscience.

  Article 9 of the "Statute Governing Relations Between The People On The Two Sides of The Taiwan Strait" (兩岸人民關係條例) stipulates that Taiwanese should apply to the relevant Taiwan authorities for permission to enter China. The Ministry of the Interior (MOI) is in charge of drafting the regulations governing the issuance of permission.

  Article 15 of the "Regulation For Citizens In The Taiwan Area To Apply For Permission To Enter The Mainland Area" (台灣地區人民進入大陸地區許可辦法) stipulates that applications from administrative, intelligence and national defense officials must be reviewed by a committee of officials from the MOI, NSB, Ministry of Justice and Mainland Affairs Council.

  Since those who violate the regulation might lose their government positions, the rule naturally has a lot more force with incumbent civil servants than with retirees or those who have left their sensitive jobs. Those who have already left their government jobs face little risk of detection by the relevant security authorities if they enter China via a third country. Should they be caught, they merely face a fine of between NT$20,000 and NT$100,000. As the fines are an ineffective deterrent, the restriction is virtually unenforceable.

  According to the regulations, an administrative or intelligence official has two weeks after his or her departure from a government position to notify the Bureau of Immigration (境管局) of an intended departure from Taiwan, leaving a two-week gap before the bureau learns about the trip.

  Pan retired from military service on June 1 and left for China on June 4 via Hong Kong. Obviously, he entered the "bandit region," not because he was ignorant of the regulations, but because he knew enough to enter China before the Bureau of Immigration learned about his retirement. The ineffectiveness of fines and the time lag make it hard to stop those who intentionally plan to violate the rules. Under the circumstances, it seems quite clear how existing regulations and law should be amended to address these problems.

  The restriction on entry into China is obviously imposed out of national security considerations. The goal is to stop former government personnel from "joining the bandits" immediately after leaving their posts and leaking confidential information.

  Another goal of the regulations is to protect the person in question. China has been severely criticized by the US and European countries for its human rights violations. The safety of businessmen in China is, therefore, under threat. Two years ago, China falsely accused a Taiwanese businessman, Kou Chien-ming (寇健明), working for "Taiwan's intelligence agencies."

  Pan put himself in peril when he entered China right after his retirement. He did nothing more than enter China without permission from Taiwan authorities. But the extensive media coverage of his trip led to him being labeled a "spy" by Chinese authorities and led to his detainment. Once China took Pan into custody, the case evolved into a suspected espionage incident. NSB Director-General Ting Yu-chou (丁渝洲) has demanded that China release Pan.

  Many Taiwanese business people have been kidnapped and murdered in China. The personal safety and property of the Taiwanese business community in China are threatened. If they also have to worry about espionage charges, an enormous political risk is being added to Tai-wanese investments in China

  Pan's plight shows Taiwanese businessmen that the Chinese government is still waging a Cold War against Taiwan. This will only decrease the willingness of Taiwanese to invest in China.

  Pan is obviously not a spy. Therefore, Beijing must release him as soon as possible.

  Lee Ching-hsiung is a Taiwan Independence Party legislator.

  Translated by Lise Chen
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Chinese technicians join airport MRT project

  • 2

    A train for whom? Is a new monorail helpful for Cairo?

  • 3

    Apple is giving Intel’s turnaround some momentum

  • 4

    Uncrewed US craft transits the Taiwan Strait

  • 5

    Taiwan assessing recruiting from Eswatini: ministry