President Chen Shui-bian (
Everything seems so ridiculous and chaotic. Which era are we living in? During his inspection of cadet troops, President Chen recited words from the will of Sun Yat-sen (孫中山), "the founding father of our nation." Every time the words "the late President Chiang Kai-shek" are mentioned, the inspected troops immediately and ritualistically stand at attention to pay tribute to Chiang. How much longer will Chiang continue to be exalted as a "great" person?
Immediately standing at attention upon hearing Chiang's name is a practice invented by Zhang Zhizhong (
Another equally ridiculous scene takes place in the conference rooms of the many military, government and educational institutions. The portrait of Sun Yat-sen hangs on the front wall of the conference room. On the back wall is President Chen's portrait, while the portraits of the two Chiangs, father and son, hang on other two walls. How "great" are the Chiangs? How much longer will their portraits remain where there?
We do not intend dig into Chiang Kai-shek's past, and do not intend to "forever have his company" (長相左右), a dying wish suggested by Chiang in his will. More than 20 years ago, then-Provincial Governor Hsieh Tung-min (謝東閔) led 21 county commissioners and city mayors to kneel down and touch the ground with their foreheads in front of the sarcophagus during Chiang's funeral. The Executive Yuan ordered all civil servants and school staffs to bear mourning signs for Chiang -- a despotic act reminiscent of fascism. It is now the year 2000, and the people of Taiwan still can't rid of Chiang. How pathetic.
At the first inter-ministry meeting of the new government, Interior Minister Chang Po-ya (
What Chang pointed out is simply common sense; however, in Taiwan many common-sense statements are taboo. Things are not as simple as they appear.
If Chang's words had came from President Chen, the pro-unification media and scholars would have blasted him with abstruse political philosophies and views of history inspired by nationalism. No one can predict how far the political uproar would have lasted.
Minister Chang, though gentle in character, is firm of purpose. In addition, nobody can find fault with her ideological stance. Many major problems that run counter to common sense can be brought up by Chang, but not by Chen. Chang has the obligation to help Taiwan become a place in harmony with humanity. We shall thank her if she successfully achieves this.
Chen Kuang-fu is a former legislator.
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
There is an old saying that if there is blood in the water, the sharks will come. In Taiwan’s case, that shark is China, circling, waiting for any sign of weakness to strike. Many thought the failed recall effort was that blood in the water, a signal for Beijing to press harder, but Taiwan’s democracy has just proven that China is mistaken. The recent recall campaign against 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, many with openly pro-Beijing leanings, failed at the ballot box. While the challenge targeted opposition lawmakers rather than President William Lai (賴清德) himself, it became an indirect
A recent critique of former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Taiwan (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” by Sasha B. Chhabra, Aug. 12, page 8) seriously misinterpreted his remarks, twisting them to fit a preconceived narrative. As a Taiwanese who witnessed his political rise and fall firsthand while living in the UK and was present for his speech in Taipei, I have a unique vantage point from which to say I think the critiques of his visit deliberately misinterpreted his words. By dwelling on his personal controversies, they obscured the real substance of his message. A clarification is needed to