Along with the changing political tides in Taiwan, a feeling of dislike toward overseas Chinese is apparently taking shape. The new administration's policies concerning overseas Chinese have taken the matter further by formalizing discrimination against some overseas Chinese.
The Overseas Chinese Affairs Commission Minister-select, Chang Fu-mei
If we analyze this new policy from traditional nationalism and the belief that "blood is thicker than water," we will inevitably be scorned for being unpractical and outdated. However, even from a purely interest-based standpoint, the new administration's policies, besides highlighting the political status of the New Taiwanese and enhancing nativization, fail to demonstrate any rationality and will have a seriously negative impact.
First, the policy will deepen the splits in the overseas Chinese community, divide a people who are mutually dependent on each other for survival, create feelings of superiority and inferiority among them, as well as give political, economical, and educational privileges to a special few. The policies give the New Taiwanese abundant resources to engage in business and industrial developments. On the other hand, the other two groups will feel like orphans. The resulting frictions and resentment are something no one would be happy to see.
The goal of overseas Chinese affairs should be to help unite the overseas Chinese so that they become mutually dependent and enjoy a good life on foreign soil.
For example the massive Korean emigration to the US did not begin until after the Korean War in the 1950's. During the next 50 years, the Korean Americans' accomplishment in the US exceeds that of Chinese Americans, a group with more than 100 years of history in the US. The Koreans have secured their positions in the business and industrial fields. In fact, in some of these fields, they enjoy a monopoly.
The most important reason for the accomplishments of the Korean Americans is the unity within the community. They offer help and engage in joint ventures with fellow countrymen, even those whom are relative strangers. The South Korean government takes very good care of them, without any discrimination. Our new administration's policies obvious run contrary to the goal of community unity.
Do not think that those traditional and old overseas Chinese serve no interests of Taiwan. During the cold-war era, the overseas Chinese's anti-communist stance influenced their host countries' policies toward China, and helped, to a certain degree, the international status of Taiwan. Even now US presidential candidates always send delegates to Chinatowns to listen to the opinions of the overseas Chinese, as a reference for their China policies.
During this past decade, Taipei has become more detached and alienated from the overseas Chinese communities, as a result of changing policies. Therefore, fewer and fewer Chinese will speak on the behalf of Taiwan.
The new administration should endeavor to win over the support and allegiance of the overseas Chinese and use this tie to influence foreign opinion and legislators. Use this bottom-to-top approach to influence the policies of the host countries and expand our international space. This approach is far more effective than lobbying congressmen and the government officials.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs also knows the importance of interaction with the private sectors. Therefore, it has encouraged our people to actively participate in international organizations. Why not make good use of the overseas Chinese as a momentum to increase our international activities?
Why are we discarding this useful force instead? For example, the recent conference held in Brazil for Chinese businessmen from around the world is an accomplishment for Taiwan in terms of foreign relations. If we support only the New Taiwanese and exclude all others, would we be able to host such a conference?
The new administration's policies should not be too narrow-minded and short-sighted. Instead, it should learn to be more magnanimous and think more in terms of long-term interests. From the standpoint of both long-term political and short-term economic interests, the government should try to win over the support of the overseas Chinese communities.
Byron N. Tzou is a research fellow at the Institute of International Relations at National Chengchi University.
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened. According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation. The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery. In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system
RSS