That yesterday's scuffle in the legislature came in the wake of an "anti-black gold promise" made by KMT presidential candidate Lien Chan (
More interestingly, such punch-ups have been going on for so long -- over a decade -- that people tend to overlook the fact that there has been a significant change in who is doing what and to whom.
In the past, opposition lawmakers used filibustering and sometimes violence as a tactic in their struggle for reform. A choreographed roughhouse or two served a dual purpose. First, it threatened to make the legislature unworkable, partly through stopping business in its tracks and partly by simply scaring away the geriatrics last elected in China in 1948 who, before 1992, made up the vast majority of a highly unrepresentative chamber. Second, at a time when the media was totally in the government's pocket, mayhem in the legislature was a way of getting publicity for the goals the opposition reformers were fighting for -- such as representative political institutions.
That was then. What we saw yesterday, for all its prima facie similarity, was something quite different. The brawling is now carried out by lawmakers with organized crime backgrounds as nothing more than intimidation of other elected representatives. Sometimes it has gone further. In one outrageous example a few years ago, thugs even pulled one legislator -- who had accused legislator Lo Fu-chu (
What seems remarkable to outsiders is that these thuggish lawmakers with gangster backgrounds remain in the legislature, getting elected time and time again. They are neither punished by their political parties nor effectively stopped by media criticism. That one of them has even served as the convener of the legislature's Judicial Affairs Committee is a major blow to the credibility of Taiwan law.
How did this happen? In the process of Taiwan's democratization, many people with organized crime backgrounds "bleached" themselves in elections and became politicians. According to statistics, two-thirds of gangs in Taiwan have lawmakers running on their behalf in the legislature, while one-quarter of elected public representatives have criminal records. These facts are a shame to Taiwan's democracy.
Japan and Italy also have their problems with organized crime syndicates, but the Yakuza and Mafia seldom get directly involved in politics. They can only buy off politicians through the back door. They dare not openly run in elections.
But Taiwan's mobsters can openly go into politics and apparently act with impunity. They get elected because of the deficiencies in Taiwan's voting system, and they are invulnerable because as the KMT's legislative majorities have slowly declined the ruling party needs the support of independent lawmakers -- including those with organized crime backgrounds -- to pass its legislative agenda.
As a result, the malignant tumor of "black gold" politics continues to grow.
President Lee Teng-hui (
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS