The Foreign Relations Committee of the US House of Representatives recently passed the Taiwan Security Enhancement Act amid tensions across the Taiwan Strait. But Taiwan does not seem to appreciate the move. Stephen Chen (3紊??, Taiwan's economic and cultural representative in the US, remains cool toward the act, prompting DPP legislators to demand his replacement. Apart from Chen, Defense Minister Tang Fei (-
Why are the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs reluctant to support a law which is apparently in Taiwan's security interests?
The chief purpose of the TSEA is for the US Congress to participate in the decision making process for weapon sales to Taiwan. The act stipulates that US executive authorities must report to Congress on Taiwan's military needs, as well as the reasons for any "yes" or "no" to Taiwan's requests. It also requires that executive authorities submit a detailed list of US weapons sales to Taiwan. Meanwhile, the US Defense Department is to carry out military exchanges with Taiwan under Congressional supervision.
In fact, most of these activities have been going on in the dark for years. Placing them in broad daylight and reporting them to Congress will ostensibly have a public relations effect -- politically and diplomatically. However, these moves will inevitably invite protests and obstruction from Beijing, which will cause misunderstandings within the US administration and eventually harm weapons sales to Taiwan, Tang Fei told lawmakers. In fact, the Clinton administration has been fiercely opposed the TSEA, and Taiwan has ordered its de facto ambassador in the US not to "interfere" in the matter.
As a result, the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA,
The US is not afraid to let Beijing know of its military cooperation with Taiwan because it is a way of asserting the US commitment to a peaceful resolution. However, the US cannot give China any justification to accuse it of violating the three communiques. This is the balancing act the US government has been performing across the Taiwan Strait.
Kurt Campbell, US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Asian Affairs, has been known to be "pro-Taiwan" since he is in charge of US-Taiwan military exchanges. However, he has also strongly opposed the TSEA in Congress because it will make his job even more difficult. For Taiwan, the act will cause harm before it brings any good.
Sino-US military cooperation began as early as 1989. Although suspended after the Tiananmen incident, it resumed in 1993. To date, more than 100 PLA officers have received training in the US.
The US military's idea is that the exchanges will help China better understand US military might and will prevent any possible Chinese follies. On the other hand, they will also bring more transparency to the Chinese military and help establish mutual confidence, which will prevent miscalculation in times of crisis. The recent appointment of Admiral Joseph Prueher, former commander of the US Navy's Pacific Fleet, as ambassador to China has made the concept even more obvious.
Amid its complex relations with China and the US, Taiwan often needs to be circumspect to maintain its national interests, although the Taiwanese public may not always be able to appreciate it.
In this regard, however, Israel may serve as a good example for Taiwan, having in the past endured a lot of humiliation for the sake of its survival and security.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS