Before settling on Seattle as the home of Amazon.com, founder Jeff Bezos considered placing the company on an Indian reservation near San Francisco.
“This way, we could have access to talent without all the tax consequences,” he said in a 1996 interview with Fast Company.
The reservation couldn’t be used as a sales-tax haven, after all, Bezos said he learned, so he had to look elsewhere. Offering prices free of sales tax to customers in California, the most populous state, would be possible only if the company were placed elsewhere.
“You have to charge sales tax to customers who live in any state where you have a business presence,” he said.
Today, Amazon collects sales tax in only five states, which gives it a continuing advantage over companies who do collect them in all or most states. Competitors aren’t the only ones hurt by Amazon’s stance on sales taxes: It also means the loss of considerable revenue to states and localities that badly need it.
The final tally on this holiday season’s sales are not yet in, but Amazon’s revenue for the four most recent quarters, ended on Sept. 30, approached US$21.7 billion. Amazon will not disclose how much tax it collected on those sales.
In addition to its home in Washington state, Amazon has facilities in North Dakota, Kentucky and Kansas, and collects sales taxes in these states. The company also collects sales tax in New York, but not cheerfully: Amazon has gone to court to overturn a law passed last year that compels it to collect from New York residents.
Yet these five do not exhaust the roll call of states in which Amazon has additional corporate offices, fulfillment and warehouse operations, customer service and other facilities. Fourteen more (among states with sales taxes) are listed in the company’s last annual report, but Amazon.com does not collect for any state on that list.
Amazon has found a way to put portions of its business into the tax-haven equivalent of reservations. By creating wholly owned subsidiaries for the parts that are treated separately for tax matters, Amazon is under no obligation to collect sales tax. This legal technique is called “entity isolation,” said Michael Mazerov, a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in Washington.
Amazon has offices in four cities in California, for example, including those that are home to the subsidiary that developed the Kindle.
“Because the subsidiary isn’t selling the Kindle directly to consumers, Amazon can drive a truck through the loophole,” Mazerov said.
He argued that Amazon was deliberately maximizing “the significant competitive advantage it gains over its rivals when they must add the typical 5 percent to 10 percent tax to their prices, but Amazon does not.”
An Amazon spokesman declined to comment about Mazerov’s assertion. But in its last quarterly report, the company told investors in its discussion of risk factors that the imposition of sales-tax collection by more states or Congress could “decrease our future sales.”
In 2000, Bezos appeared before booksellers attending BookExpo America and presented the case for why his company shouldn’t be compelled to collect sales taxes for purchases made by customers other than those who lived in Washington.
“In Washington state, where we have a presence, we get police protection, we get fire protection. We send our kids to local schools,” The Associated Press quoted him as saying.
He said he didn’t understand why, “since we get no services from North Carolina, that they should be able to force us to collect taxes for them.”
That was then. Today, employees of Amazon’s wholly owned subsidiaries presumably get police and fire protection and other services even though the company is not collecting sales taxes in the states where they’re located. And this may be a good time to point out that states and localities are having a bit of a tough time paying bills. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates that state budget gaps for this year and next year combined will be more than US$350 billion.
Wider collection of the sales tax is not going to plug a hole of that size, but every billion or two would help. In California, the state Board of Equalization estimates annual tax revenue losses of US$1.085 billion from unpaid “use taxes,” which are supposed to be paid for out-of-state purchases.
Some 147 million people, or half the nation’s population, live in sales-tax-levying states where Amazon has facilities but does not collect tax on residents’ purchases.
An Amazon spokesman described today’s sales taxes as “very complex,” but said the company would welcome a “simplified system, fairly applied to all business models.”
If the complexities that its retail competitors have mastered really are an insuperable difficulty for Amazon, it could contract with a commercial vendor that specializes in these calculations, like Vertex, as Netflix does.
Meeting the tax-collection obligation is “not very hard,” said Reed Hastings, Netflix’s chief executive, in a comment posted last year on a New York Times blog.
It would seem hard for Amazon to argue that the complexities of collection are too overwhelming. It already handles the online sales of its partner, Target.com, for whom it collects sales taxes for all but two states that assess them.
If Bezos wanted to do his part to avert layoffs of teachers and firefighters and, yes, professors at state universities, he should start collecting the sales tax.
Amazon’s in-house counsel should help the company meet its civic obligations — and toss “entity isolation” in the trash can. Amazon’s employees are too scattered, its customer base and its sales too large and the US’ fiscal crisis too grave for it to continue to play tax-avoidance games.
CELEBRATION: The PRC turned 75 on Oct. 1, but the Republic of China is older. The PRC could never be the homeland of the people of the ROC, Lai said The People’s Republic of China (PRC) could not be the “motherland” of the people of the Republic of China (ROC), President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks in a speech at a Double Ten National Day gala in Taipei, which is part of National Day celebrations that are to culminate in a fireworks display in Yunlin County on Thursday night next week. Lai wished the country a happy birthday and called on attendees to enjoy the performances and activities while keeping in mind that the ROC is a sovereign and independent nation. He appealed for everyone to always love their
‘EXTREME PRESSURE’: Beijing’s goal is to ‘force Taiwan to make mistakes,’ Admiral Tang Hua said, adding that mishaps could serve as ‘excuses’ for launching a blockade China’s authoritarian expansionism threatens not only Taiwan, but the rules-based international order, the navy said yesterday, after its top commander said in an interview that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could blockade the nation at will. The object of Beijing’s expansionist activities is not limited to Taiwan and its use of pressure is not confined to specific political groups or people, the navy said in a statement. China utilizes a mixture of cognitive warfare and “gray zone” military activities to pressure Taiwan, the navy said, adding that PLA sea and air forces are compressing the nation’s defensive depth. The navy continues to
MAKING PROGRESS: Officials and industry leaders who participated in a defense forum last month agreed that Taiwan has the capabilities to work with the US, the report said Taiwan’s high-tech defense industry is to enhance collaboration with the US to produce weapons needed for self-defense, the Ministry of National Defense said in a report to the Legislative Yuan. Deputy Minister of National Defense Hsu Yen-pu (徐衍璞) discussed building regional and global industry alliances with US partners at the US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference in Philadelphia held from Sept. 22 to Tuesday last week, the ministry said in the declassified portion of the report. The visit contributed to maintaining bilateral ties, facilitated Taiwan’s efforts to acquire weapons and equipment, and strengthened the resilience of the two nation’s defense industries, it said. Taiwan-US ties
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS