Intel Corp on Wednesday announced tech industry veteran Lip-Bu Tan (陳立武) as its new chief executive, boosting shares of the US computer chipmaker struggling to catch up in the artificial intelligence (AI) race. Tan told the Intel team his focus would be on engineering, saying it “won’t be easy” to overcome challenges faced by the company.
Tan, who was born in Malaysia, would start as Intel chief on Tuesday next week, the company said.
Shares were up more than 10 percent in after-market trade.
Photo: REUTERS
Intel is one of Silicon Valley’s most iconic companies, but its fortunes have been eclipsed by Asian powerhouses Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) and Samsung Electronics Co, which dominate the made-to-order semiconductor business. The company was also caught by surprise with the emergence of Nvidia Corp, a graphics chip maker, as the world’s preeminent AI chip provider.
Tan’s predecessor, Pat Gelsinger, was forced out as Intel chief in December last year after the board lost confidence in his plans to turn the company around. Gelsinger’s abrupt departure came just months after the company vowed to cut more than 15,000 jobs in a draconian cost reduction plan and paused or delayed construction on several chipmaking facilities.
“I believe with every fiber of my being that we have what it takes to win,” Tan said in a letter to his team, vowing that Intel would be an engineering-focused company.
“In areas where we are behind the competition, we need to take calculated risks to disrupt and leapfrog,” he said.
While chief of Cadence Design Systems Inc from 2009 to 2021, Tan transformed the company and more than doubled its revenue, according to the Intel board.
Intel last month extended the timeline for completing two new fabrication plants in Ohio, saying it is taking a prudent approach to the US$28 billion project.
The incoming CEO said that he would stick with his predecessor’s plan to make chips for other companies.
“We will work hard to restore Intel’s position as a world-class products company, establish ourselves as a world-class foundry and delight our customers like never before,” he said in the letter. “That’s what this moment demands of us as we remake Intel for the future.”
Plowing ahead with the foundry strategy means taking on TSMC in a market that the Taiwanese company pioneered. TSMC is dominant in the field, churning out chips for clients such as Nvidia, Apple Inc and Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
It is still an open question whether Tan might split up the foundry and chip-design businesses, Raymond James Financial Inc analyst Srini Pajjuri said in a note to clients. Barring that move, Intel would have to demonstrate that it could produce better products.
Members of US President Donald Trump’s administration have floated the idea of TSMC backing a spinoff of Intel’s factory business. However, TSMC’s recent plan to invest US$100 billion in its own factories suggests that it is not aiming to pursue that idea.
“In case of no split, the stock will likely remain a show-me story until investors get a better sense of the company’s manufacturing road map,” Pajjuri said.
In addition, Intel is playing catch-up in the hottest segment of the industry: AI chips for data centers. Nvidia remains dominant in that area.
“Intel lacks an AI narrative,” Pajjuri said. “As such, we remain on the sidelines as we await to hear from the new CEO on his plans for the company.”
Additional reporting by Bloomberg
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) secured a record 70.2 percent share of the global foundry business in the second quarter, up from 67.6 percent the previous quarter, and continued widening its lead over second-placed Samsung Electronics Co, TrendForce Corp (集邦科技) said on Monday. TSMC posted US$30.24 billion in sales in the April-to-June period, up 18.5 percent from the previous quarter, driven by major smartphone customers entering their ramp-up cycle and robust demand for artificial intelligence chips, laptops and PCs, which boosted wafer shipments and average selling prices, TrendForce said in a report. Samsung’s sales also grew in the second quarter, up
On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump weighed in on a pressing national issue: The rebranding of a restaurant chain. Last week, Cracker Barrel, a Tennessee company whose nationwide locations lean heavily on a cozy, old-timey aesthetic — “rocking chairs on the porch, a warm fire in the hearth, peg games on the table” — announced it was updating its logo. Uncle Herschel, the man who once appeared next to the letters with a barrel, was gone. It sparked ire on the right, with Donald Trump Jr leading a charge against the rebranding: “WTF is wrong with Cracker Barrel?!” Later, Trump Sr weighed
HEADWINDS: Upfront investment is unavoidable in the merger, but cost savings would materialize over time, TS Financial Holding Co president Welch Lin said TS Financial Holding Co (台新新光金控) said it would take about two years before the benefits of its merger with Shin Kong Financial Holding Co (新光金控) become evident, as the group prioritizes the consolidation of its major subsidiaries. “The group’s priority is to complete the consolidation of different subsidiaries,” Welch Lin (林維俊), president of the nation’s fourth-largest financial conglomerate by assets, told reporters during its first earnings briefing since the merger took effect on July 24. The asset management units are scheduled to merge in November, followed by life insurance in January next year and securities operations in April, Lin said. Banking integration,
LOOPHOLES: The move is to end a break that was aiding foreign producers without any similar benefit for US manufacturers, the US Department of Commerce said US President Donald Trump’s administration would make it harder for Samsung Electronics Co and SK Hynix Inc to ship critical equipment to their chipmaking operations in China, dealing a potential blow to the companies’ production in the world’s largest semiconductor market. The US Department of Commerce in a notice published on Friday said that it was revoking waivers for Samsung and SK Hynix to use US technologies in their Chinese operations. The companies had been operating in China under regulations that allow them to import chipmaking equipment without applying for a new license each time. The move would revise what is known