A US judge on Monday handed Alphabet Inc’s Google a major legal blow, ruling in a landmark antitrust case that it has maintained a monopoly with its dominant search engine.
The court decision against a “big tech” giant could alter how the sector operates
US District Court Judge Amit Mehta found that Google had a monopoly for search and for text advertisements through exclusive distribution agreements that made it the “default” option that people were likely to use on devices.
Photo: AP
“After having carefully considered and weighed the witness testimony and evidence, the court reaches the following conclusion: Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” Mehta wrote in his ruling.
The Internet behemoth “has a major, largely unseen advantage over its rivals: default distribution,” he wrote.
The antitrust trial pitting US prosecutors and nearly a dozen states against Google ended in May.
At the heart of the government’s case was the massive payments made by Google to Apple Inc and other companies to keep its world-leading search engine as the default on iPhones, Web browsers and other products.
US Department of Justice lawyers argued that Google achieved and perpetuated its dominance — and strangled rivals — through these default deals that also expanded to Samsung Electronics Co and other device makers.
“This victory against Google is a historic win for the American people,” US Attorney General Merrick Garland said. “No company — no matter how large or influential — is above the law.”
Google would appeal the verdict, Alphabet global affairs president and chief legal officer Kent Walker said.
Walker pointed out that Mehta concludes Google is the industry’s highest-quality search engine, particularly on mobile devices.
“Given this, and that people are increasingly looking for information in more and more ways, we plan to appeal,” Walker said. “As this process continues, we will remain focused on making products that people find helpful and easy to use.”
It remained to be seen what remedies or damages the judge might order in the case.
In one possible good sign for Google, Mehta concluded in his ruling that the technology titan’s contravention of the US Sherman Antitrust Act did not have “anticompetitive effects.”
“Google’s loss in its search antitrust trial could be a huge deal — depending on the remedy,” Emarketer senior analyst Evelyn Mitchell-Wolf said.
“A forced divestiture of the search business would sever Alphabet from its largest source of revenue,” she said.
Even losing the option of making exclusive deals to be the default option on browsers, smartphones or computers would hurt Google, she added.
Google’s search business would be hampered as generative artificial intelligence wielded by Microsoft Corp’s Bing and OpenAI’s budding “SearchGPT” ramp up competition.
“The biggest winner from today’s ruling isn’t consumers or little tech, it’s Microsoft,” Chamber of Progress CEO Adam Kovacevich said. “Microsoft has underinvested in search for decades, but today’s ruling opens the door to a court mandate of default deals for Bing.”
SEEKING CLARITY: Washington should not adopt measures that create uncertainties for ‘existing semiconductor investments,’ TSMC said referring to its US$165 billion in the US Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) told the US that any future tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors could reduce demand for chips and derail its pledge to increase its investment in Arizona. “New import restrictions could jeopardize current US leadership in the competitive technology industry and create uncertainties for many committed semiconductor capital projects in the US, including TSMC Arizona’s significant investment plan in Phoenix,” the chipmaker wrote in a letter to the US Department of Commerce. TSMC issued the warning in response to a solicitation for comments by the department on a possible tariff on semiconductor imports by US President Donald Trump’s
‘FAILED EXPORT CONTROLS’: Jensen Huang said that Washington should maximize the speed of AI diffusion, because not doing so would give competitors an advantage Nvidia Corp cofounder and chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) yesterday criticized the US government’s restrictions on exports of artificial intelligence (AI) chips to China, saying that the policy was a failure and would only spur China to accelerate AI development. The export controls gave China the spirit, motivation and government support to accelerate AI development, Huang told reporters at the Computex trade show in Taipei. The competition in China is already intense, given its strong software capabilities, extensive technology ecosystems and work efficiency, he said. “All in all, the export controls were a failure. The facts would suggest it,” he said. “The US
The government has launched a three-pronged strategy to attract local and international talent, aiming to position Taiwan as a new global hub following Nvidia Corp’s announcement that it has chosen Taipei as the site of its Taiwan headquarters. Nvidia cofounder and CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) on Monday last week announced during his keynote speech at the Computex trade show in Taipei that the Nvidia Constellation, the company’s planned Taiwan headquarters, would be located in the Beitou-Shilin Technology Park (北投士林科技園區) in Taipei. Huang’s decision to establish a base in Taiwan is “primarily due to Taiwan’s talent pool and its strength in the semiconductor
French President Emmanuel Macron has expressed gratitude to Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) for its plan to invest approximately 250 million euros (US$278 million) in a joint venture in France focused on the semiconductor and space industries. On his official X account on Tuesday, Macron thanked Hon Hai, also known globally as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), for its investment projects announced at Choose France, a flagship economic summit held on Monday to attract foreign investment. In the post, Macron included a GIF displaying the national flag of the Republic of China (Taiwan), as he did for other foreign investors, including China-based
RSS