A US judge on Monday handed Alphabet Inc’s Google a major legal blow, ruling in a landmark antitrust case that it has maintained a monopoly with its dominant search engine.
The court decision against a “big tech” giant could alter how the sector operates
US District Court Judge Amit Mehta found that Google had a monopoly for search and for text advertisements through exclusive distribution agreements that made it the “default” option that people were likely to use on devices.
Photo: AP
“After having carefully considered and weighed the witness testimony and evidence, the court reaches the following conclusion: Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” Mehta wrote in his ruling.
The Internet behemoth “has a major, largely unseen advantage over its rivals: default distribution,” he wrote.
The antitrust trial pitting US prosecutors and nearly a dozen states against Google ended in May.
At the heart of the government’s case was the massive payments made by Google to Apple Inc and other companies to keep its world-leading search engine as the default on iPhones, Web browsers and other products.
US Department of Justice lawyers argued that Google achieved and perpetuated its dominance — and strangled rivals — through these default deals that also expanded to Samsung Electronics Co and other device makers.
“This victory against Google is a historic win for the American people,” US Attorney General Merrick Garland said. “No company — no matter how large or influential — is above the law.”
Google would appeal the verdict, Alphabet global affairs president and chief legal officer Kent Walker said.
Walker pointed out that Mehta concludes Google is the industry’s highest-quality search engine, particularly on mobile devices.
“Given this, and that people are increasingly looking for information in more and more ways, we plan to appeal,” Walker said. “As this process continues, we will remain focused on making products that people find helpful and easy to use.”
It remained to be seen what remedies or damages the judge might order in the case.
In one possible good sign for Google, Mehta concluded in his ruling that the technology titan’s contravention of the US Sherman Antitrust Act did not have “anticompetitive effects.”
“Google’s loss in its search antitrust trial could be a huge deal — depending on the remedy,” Emarketer senior analyst Evelyn Mitchell-Wolf said.
“A forced divestiture of the search business would sever Alphabet from its largest source of revenue,” she said.
Even losing the option of making exclusive deals to be the default option on browsers, smartphones or computers would hurt Google, she added.
Google’s search business would be hampered as generative artificial intelligence wielded by Microsoft Corp’s Bing and OpenAI’s budding “SearchGPT” ramp up competition.
“The biggest winner from today’s ruling isn’t consumers or little tech, it’s Microsoft,” Chamber of Progress CEO Adam Kovacevich said. “Microsoft has underinvested in search for decades, but today’s ruling opens the door to a court mandate of default deals for Bing.”
BYPASSING CHINA TARIFFS: In the first five months of this year, Foxconn sent US$4.4bn of iPhones to the US from India, compared with US$3.7bn in the whole of last year Nearly all the iPhones exported by Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團) from India went to the US between March and last month, customs data showed, far above last year’s average of 50 percent and a clear sign of Apple Inc’s efforts to bypass high US tariffs imposed on China. The numbers, being reported by Reuters for the first time, show that Apple has realigned its India exports to almost exclusively serve the US market, when previously the devices were more widely distributed to nations including the Netherlands and the Czech Republic. During March to last month, Foxconn, known as Hon Hai Precision Industry
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) and the University of Tokyo (UTokyo) yesterday announced the launch of the TSMC-UTokyo Lab to promote advanced semiconductor research, education and talent development. The lab is TSMC’s first laboratory collaboration with a university outside Taiwan, the company said in a statement. The lab would leverage “the extensive knowledge, experience, and creativity” of both institutions, the company said. It is located in the Asano Section of UTokyo’s Hongo, Tokyo, campus and would be managed by UTokyo faculty, guided by directors from UTokyo and TSMC, the company said. TSMC began working with UTokyo in 2019, resulting in 21 research projects,
Ashton Hall’s morning routine involves dunking his head in iced Saratoga Spring Water. For the company that sells the bottled water — Hall’s brand of choice for drinking, brushing his teeth and submerging himself — that is fantastic news. “We’re so thankful to this incredible fitness influencer called Ashton Hall,” Saratoga owner Primo Brands Corp’s CEO Robbert Rietbroek said on an earnings call after Hall’s morning routine video went viral. “He really helped put our brand on the map.” Primo Brands, which was not affiliated with Hall when he made his video, is among the increasing number of companies benefiting from influencer
Quanta Computer Inc (廣達) chairman Barry Lam (林百里) yesterday expressed a downbeat view about the prospects of humanoid robots, given high manufacturing costs and a lack of target customers. Despite rising demand and high expectations for humanoid robots, high research-and-development costs and uncertain profitability remain major concerns, Lam told reporters following the company’s annual shareholders’ meeting in Taoyuan. “Since it seems a bit unworthy to use such high-cost robots to do household chores, I believe robots designed for specific purposes would be more valuable and present a better business opportunity,” Lam said Instead of investing in humanoid robots, Quanta has opted to invest
RSS