Spurred on by major technological advances and huge private investment, the US nuclear fusion sector could be producing electricity within 10 years, industry players say.
The process, which powers the Sun and other stars, sees two atomic nuclei combine — and release massive amounts of energy. However, private companies on Earth are also hoping that decades of research might finally culminate in fusion power plants being connected to the grid in the 2030s.
The buzz comes amid an influx of cash: In two years, the private sector has more than doubled its investments, reaching a total of US$5.9 billion at the end of last year, compared with just US$271 million from the public sector.
Photo: AFP/Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Part of the hype is derived from what experts see as an impending tipping point, where theoretical science would soon become a reality.
“It’s not just about doing science, it’s actually about delivering products,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Plasma Science and Fusion Center director Dennis Whyte said.
About two-thirds of start-ups from various countries, surveyed by the Fusion Industry Association see the first fusion power plant connected to the power grid by 2035 at the latest.
Last year, Helion Energy Inc, a fusion power start-up in Washington state, signed an agreement with Microsoft Corp for 50 megawatts of capacity to be operational by 2029.
“Remarkable things have happened just in the last couple of years,” Focused Energy Inc chief technology officer Pravesh Patel said at the CERAWeek energy conference in March.
“It’s like the first time the Wright brothers took off the ground,” he said, referring to the first-ever flight of a powered aircraft in 1903. “People can see that it’s possible. It’s no longer theoretical.”
Major recent milestones include an experiment by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in California in December 2022, in which more energy was released from the fusion than was used to produce it.
Fusion consists of assembling two atomic nuclei derived from hydrogen, usually deuterium and tritium, in a confined enclosure, at a heat of more than 100 million degrees Celsius.
Together, they form a helium nucleus and release neutrons, which bombard the reactor walls and raise their temperature.
This heat is then converted into electricity, via steam produced when water comes into contact with the outside of the reactor.
Fusion has the advantage of being emissions-free. It also produces less waste than its cousin fission and cannot cause a radiation disaster.
Most start-ups have opted for the magnetic confinement technology used in the tokamak, the best-known reactor model. This differs from the inertial confinement method chosen by LLNL, which uses lasers.
Helion, on the other hand, recovers energy directly from inside the reactor, without using steam, and its process produces less neutrons, thus reducing projections on the walls and their erosion.
Such methods “offer an advantage in getting to commercialization,” a Helion spokesperson said.
Until recently, the economic viability of nuclear fusion appeared uncertain, as magnetic confinement required the manufacture of gigantic magnets.
However, recently published studies by researchers at MIT and start-up Commonwealth Fusion Systems have shown that fusion is possible with much smaller magnets than originally imagined.
“Overnight, this has divided the cost per watt by 40,” Whyte told MIT News. “Now fusion has a chance” to become a reality in energy supply, he said.
With US$2 billion in private capital, Commonwealth is by far the company to have raised the most funds in the sector. It plans to activate its demonstration reactor, SPARC, next year, then open its first power plant in the early 2030s.
Many uncertainties remain, but if Commonwealth and Helion are successful, it would enable the US to become the first country to produce commercial electricity through fusion, a step no other nation is aiming for before 2035 at best.
“Commonwealth is a great example of what you can do, and how fast you can go, when you have this commercial incentive in the private sector versus in the public sector,” Patel said.
“The US has a particularly excellent track record of this,” Whyte said.
US university labs’ ability to translate research into products is often smoother than in other countries, Whyte said, adding that the US has a strong venture capital sector to enable start-ups to get off the ground.
From the semiconductor revolution to that of the Internet, “the US has won these kinds of races,” Whyte said.
SECOND-RATE: Models distilled from US products do not perform the same as the original and undo measures that ensure the systems are neutral, the US’ cable said The US Department of State has ordered a global push to bring attention to what it said are widespread efforts by Chinese companies, including artificial intelligence (AI) start-up DeepSeek (深度求索), to steal intellectual property from US AI labs, according to a diplomatic cable. The cable, dated Friday and sent to diplomatic and consular posts around the world, instructs diplomatic staff to speak to their foreign counterparts about “concerns over adversaries’ extraction and distillation of US AI models.” Distillation is the process of training smaller AI models using output from larger, more expensive ones to lower the costs of training a powerful new
Micron Technology Inc is a driving force pushing the US Congress to pass legislation that would put new export restrictions on equipment its Chinese competitors use to make their chips, according to people familiar with the matter. A US House of Representatives panel yesterday was to vote on the “MATCH Act,” a bill designed to close gaps in restrictions on chipmaking equipment. It would also pressure foreign companies that sell equipment to Chinese chipmaking facilities to align with export curbs on US companies like Lam Research Corp and Applied Materials Inc. The bill targets facilities operated by China’s ChangXin Memory Technologies Inc
Singapore-based ride-hailing and delivery giant Grab Holdings’ planned acquisition of Foodpanda’s Taiwan operations has yet to enter the formal review stage, as regulators await supplementary documents, the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) said yesterday. Acting FTC Chairman Chen Chih-min (陳志民) told the legislature’s Economics Committee that although Grab submitted its application on March 27, the case has not been officially accepted because required materials remain incomplete. Once the filing is finalized, the FTC would launch a formal probe into the deal, focusing on issues such as cross-shareholding and potential restrictions on market competition, Chen told lawmakers. Grab last month announced that it would acquire
The artificial intelligence (AI) boom has triggered a seismic reshuffling of global equity markets, with Taiwan and South Korea muscling past European nations one by one. With its stock market now valued at nearly US$4.3 trillion, Taiwan surpassed the UK, Europe’s biggest market, earlier this month, data compiled by Bloomberg showed. South Korea is about US$140 billion away from doing the same. The tech-heavy Asian markets have shot past Germany and France in the past seven months. The shift is largely down to massive gains in shares of three companies that provide essential hardware for AI: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電),