Chinese universities and research institutes recently obtained high-end Nvidia Corp artificial intelligence (AI) chips through resellers, despite the US widening a ban last year on the sale of such technology to China.
A Reuters review of hundreds of tender documents shows 10 Chinese entities acquired advanced Nvidia chips embedded in server products made by Super Micro Computer Inc, Dell Technologies Inc and Taiwan’s Gigabyte Technology Co (技嘉) after the US on Nov. 17 last year expanded the embargo to subject more chips and countries to licensing rules.
Specifically, the servers contained some of Nvidia’s most advanced chips, according to the previously unreported tenders fulfilled between Nov. 20 and Feb. 28. While the US bars Nvidia and its partners from selling advanced chips to China, including via third parties, the sale and purchase of the chips are not illegal in China.
Photo: Bloomberg
The 11 sellers of the chips were little-known Chinese retailers.
Contacted by Reuters, Nvidia said the tenders specify products that were exported and widely available before the US tightened chip-export restrictions in November.
“They do not indicate that any of our partners violated the export control rules and are a negligible fraction of the products sold worldwide,” a spokesperson said.
The server makers said they complied with applicable laws or would investigate further.
Among the buyers were the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Shandong Artificial Intelligence Institute, Hubei Earthquake Administration, the Shandong and Southwest universities, a tech investment firm owned by the Heilongjiang provincial government, a state-run aviation research center and a space science center.
Daniel Gerkin, a Washington-based partner at law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP, said Nvidia chips could have been diverted to China without a manufacturer’s knowledge, given a lack of visibility into downstream supply chains.
If the manufacturer had performed sufficient due diligence, “it presumably would be challenging for the US government to pursue an enforcement action,” he said.
The US Department of Commerce told Reuters it could not comment on any potential ongoing investigations, but said its Bureau of Industry and Security monitored diversions of restricted chips, conducted end-use checks and examined potential breaches.
Officials would investigate credible allegations of violations, including through the use of shell companies, a spokesperson said.
Nvidia said systems built with its graphic processing units (GPUs) - chips that break computer tasks into smaller pieces and process them together - and resold by third parties must comply with US restrictions.
“If we determine that any product was subsequently resold in violation of US export control rules, we’ll work with our customers to take appropriate action,” the spokesperson said.
Super Micro said it complied with US requirements on the sale and export of GPU systems to regions and parties that require licenses.
“If we become aware that a third party has exported or reexported without the required licenses, we investigate the matter and take appropriate action,” it said.
In a letter to Reuters on behalf of Super Micro, US law firm Clare Locke LLP said its client “goes above and beyond what US export restrictions require” by proactively taking steps to ensure its customers do not violate the curbs.
In relation to the tenders that identified its products, Super Micro said they represent “older generation or general purpose servers not capable of the largest scale AI operations that were available in China prior to the export control regulations.” The awarded suppliers “are not known Supermicro customers,” it said.
A Dell spokesperson said the company “found no evidence of shipping products configured with the restricted chips you listed to the entities you named,” but that it would continue to investigate.
“Our distributors and resellers are required to comply with all applicable global regulations and export controls. If we become aware of a distributor or reseller that is not complying with these obligations, we take appropriate actions, including termination of our relationship,” the spokesperson said.
Gigabyte said in an email that it complied with Taiwanese laws and international regulations. It did not respond to subsequent questions about tenders that identified its products as a source of banned Nvidia chips. The Ministry of Economic Affairs said it expected Taiwanese companies to respect US export controls.
The transactions were disclosed in a dozen of the tenders, which Reuters found on public databases that cover only a fraction of purchases by China’s state entities. But the small snapshot shows China still has access to advanced chips that US officials say could support AI for military applications, such as the modernization of China’s defense forces or for developing weapons like hypersonic missiles.
Each of the purchases were limited to several servers and several dozen banned chips. Still, they could be useful for training models and conducting advanced research, according to seven analysts and industry executives.
The tenders — valued at between 71,500 yuan and 1.86 million yuan, or about US$10,000 and US$259,000 — did not specify the intended uses.
PATENTS: MediaTek Inc said it would not comment on ongoing legal cases, but does not expect the legal action by Huawei to affect its business operations Smartphone integrated chips designer MediaTek Inc (聯發科) on Friday said that a lawsuit filed by Chinese smartphone brand Huawei Technologies Co (華為) over alleged patent infringements would have little impact on its operations. In an announcement posted on the Taiwan Stock Exchange, MediaTek said that it would not comment on an ongoing legal case. However, the company said that Huawei’s legal action would have little impact on its operations. MediaTek’s statement came after China-based PRIP Research said on Thursday that Huawei filed a lawsuit with a Chinese district court claiming that MediaTek infringed on its patents. The infringement mentioned in the lawsuit likely involved
Taipei is today suspending work, classes and its US$2.4 trillion stock market as Typhoon Gaemi approaches Taiwan with strong winds and heavy rain. The nation is not conducting securities, currency or fixed income trading, statements from its stock and currency exchanges said. Authorities had yesterday issued a warning that the storm could affect people on land and canceled some ship crossings and domestic flights. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) expects its local chipmaking fabs to maintain normal production, the company said in an e-mailed statement. The main chipmaker for Apple Inc and Nvidia Corp said it has activated routine typhoon alert
GROWTH: TSMC increased its projected revenue growth for this year to more than 25 percent, citing stronger-than-expected demand for AI devices and smartphones The Taiwan Institute of Economic Research (TIER, 台灣經濟研究院) yesterday raised its forecast for Taiwan’s GDP growth this year from 3.29 percent to 3.85 percent, as exports and private investment recovered faster than it predicted three months ago. The Taipei-based think tank also expects that Taiwan would see a 8.19 percent increase in exports this year, better than the 7.55 percent it projected in April, as US technology giants spent more money on artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure and development. “There will be more AI servers going forward, but it remains to be seen if the momentum would extend to personal computers, smartphones and
Catastrophic computer outages caused by a software update from one company have once again exposed the dangers of global technological dependence on a handful of players, experts said on Friday. A flawed update sent out by the little-known security firm CrowdStrike Holdings Inc brought airlines, TV stations and myriad other aspects of daily life to a standstill. The outages affected companies or individuals that use CrowdStrike on the Microsoft Inc’s Windows platform. When they applied the update, the incompatible software crashed computers into a frozen state known as the “blue screen of death.” “Today CrowdStrike has become a household name, but not in