Like many US political watchers, a Nevada resident named Domer had an opinion about who would emerge from turmoil within the Republican Party to become the next speaker of the US House of Representatives.
Unlike most of them, he made US$13,000 when Mike Johnson was finally elected last month.
That political gambling is illegal in the US has not deterred Domer (a nickname he provided) or others like him from using online overseas markets to wager on US politics.
Photo: AFP
Domer, who said he earns about US$500,000 a year betting on politics across the globe including in Italy and South Africa, is often active in chatrooms on Discord and other sites that buzz with debate among aficionados.
“There’s a lot of trash talk — it’s similar to sports betting,” he said. “It’s combative and congenial at the same time.”
Political betting was common — and legal — in the US until the rise of relatively accurate polling in the 1930s.
Futures trading regulations passed in 1936, as well as crackdowns on sports betting and the perception of gambling as seedy all helped put an end to markets that once populated Wall Street and the politics pages of newspapers.
Today, critics still worry gambling could fuel corruption or the gamification of the political system.
However, as the Internet has made gambling easier, people like Domer use virtual private networks to skirt around government regulators that have closed down sites or halted the entry of platforms that try to offer political betting to Americans.
Only two have been able to stay alive, due to their affiliations with university research projects.
The government moved last year to shut down one of them, PredictIt, alleging it had exceeded its research-focused mandate. It was granted a lifeline by a July court decision in its favor that would keep its lights on as litigation continues.
Supporters say legal markets offer benefits to the public and traders alike, and the effect is negligible as bets are capped at a few hundred dollars.
“These markets encourage attention to political events, and they serve as an antidote to fake news,” PredictIt CEO John Phillips said.
“Prediction markets are not perfect,” he said, but they are “better than polling.”
There are studies backing him up, although it is a contention that not all political scientists agree with. For better or worse, journalists stick almost exclusively with polls — which, traders say, also inform their bets.
PredictIt is currently offering shares in US President Joe Biden being a presidential nominee for US$0.68, meaning a trader who bought a share would earn US$0.32 if he is the Democratic candidate in next year’s election, which is likely.
However, bet big on California Governor Gavin Newsom, who has not even entered the race, and each share bought for US$0.23 would earn US$0.77, minus fees.
Markets also deliver insights that polls do not always capture — not just about politics, but also economics, said Tom Gruca, director of the Iowa Electronic Markets, a political betting operation run at the University of Iowa, where he also teaches.
“When you answer a poll, you tell people what you wish is going to happen,” unlike a market, which captures “what you think is going to happen,” he said.
“Even a small amount of money changes the stakes for people,” Gruca said, describing a class where, after giving students money to trade, they were “ready to rip each other limb from limb over movements of US$0.10.”
Political gambling expert Pratik Chougule also cashed in on a House speaker bet, cleaning up US$130 after Jim Jordan lost, and has most recently put about US$1,000 into Biden being the Democratic nominee.
Chougule cohosts a betting podcast, and started an advocacy group to push for legalization.
“I was a pretty true believer in the Iraq war... I had gotten that issue very wrong,” Chougule said. “I basically realized that bad prediction, bad forecasting in our policymaking is actually the norm, not the exception.”
“Having skin in the game is at least an important consideration in doing better,” he added.
For markets to work — for academic insights to be gleaned and riches to be won — there must also be losers.
“I’m currently betting a lot of money that [former US president Donald] Trump will not be the GOP [Republican] nominee — which was what I thought was a smart bet a year ago, and is now looking like the world’s dumbest bet ever,” Domer said.
Despite — or perhaps, because of — the court indictments stacking up against the former president, he looks almost certain to grab the Republican presidential nomination.
So just how dumb was Domer’s bet?
“Oh, I’m gonna lose a couple hundred thousand,” he said.
CAUTIOUS RECOVERY: While the manufacturing sector returned to growth amid the US-China trade truce, firms remain wary as uncertainty clouds the outlook, the CIER said The local manufacturing sector returned to expansion last month, as the official purchasing managers’ index (PMI) rose 2.1 points to 51.0, driven by a temporary easing in US-China trade tensions, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. The PMI gauges the health of the manufacturing industry, with readings above 50 indicating expansion and those below 50 signaling contraction. “Firms are not as pessimistic as they were in April, but they remain far from optimistic,” CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) said at a news conference. The full impact of US tariff decisions is unlikely to become clear until later this month
GROWING CONCERN: Some senior Trump administration officials opposed the UAE expansion over fears that another TSMC project could jeopardize its US investment Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) is evaluating building an advanced production facility in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and has discussed the possibility with officials in US President Donald Trump’s administration, people familiar with the matter said, in a potentially major bet on the Middle East that would only come to fruition with Washington’s approval. The company has had multiple meetings in the past few months with US Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff and officials from MGX, an influential investment vehicle overseen by the UAE president’s brother, the people said. The conversations are a continuation of talks that
CHIP DUTIES: TSMC said it voiced its concerns to Washington about tariffs, telling the US commerce department that it wants ‘fair treatment’ to protect its competitiveness Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday reiterated robust business prospects for this year as strong artificial intelligence (AI) chip demand from Nvidia Corp and other customers would absorb the impacts of US tariffs. “The impact of tariffs would be indirect, as the custom tax is the importers’ responsibility, not the exporters,” TSMC chairman and chief executive officer C.C. Wei (魏哲家) said at the chipmaker’s annual shareholders’ meeting in Hsinchu City. TSMC’s business could be affected if people become reluctant to buy electronics due to inflated prices, Wei said. In addition, the chipmaker has voiced its concern to the US Department of Commerce
STILL LOADED: Last year’s richest person, Quanta Computer Inc chairman Barry Lam, dropped to second place despite an 8 percent increase in his wealth to US$12.6 billion Staff writer, with CNA Daniel Tsai (蔡明忠) and Richard Tsai (蔡明興), the brothers who run Fubon Group (富邦集團), topped the Forbes list of Taiwan’s 50 richest people this year, released on Wednesday in New York. The magazine said that a stronger New Taiwan dollar pushed the combined wealth of Taiwan’s 50 richest people up 13 percent, from US$174 billion to US$197 billion, with 36 of the people on the list seeing their wealth increase. That came as Taiwan’s economy grew 4.6 percent last year, its fastest pace in three years, driven by the strong performance of the semiconductor industry, the magazine said. The Tsai
RSS