Harper Murray puts on her Adidas AG volleyball shoes when she practices or plays in a match for Nebraska, one of the top teams in the country. It is not necessarily the brand she would choose; it is because the German company is her school’s official supplier, and athletes, coaches and staff are required to wear its products.
Texas’ Reilly Heinrich and Virginia’s Ashley Le wear Nike Inc shoes because their schools are under contract with the shoe giant. Heinrich actually wears basketball shoes bearing the familiar swoosh because she says they fit better than Nike’s volleyball shoes.
All three also are brand ambassadors for a new volleyball shoe brand, Avoli, which they promote on social media platforms as part of their name, image and likeness compensation deals with the start-up based in Portland, Oregon, also the hometown of Nike.
Photo: AP
The three can tout Avoli all they want, but it is highly unlikely they would ever wear the brand when they actually represent their schools in competition — a familiar and seemingly immovable hurdle for athletes in many college sports. While they now have the freedom to earn money from name, image and likeness (NIL) endorsements, they remain beholden to terms of apparel contracts paying millions to their schools and nothing to them.
For example, Adidas gives Nebraska US$4.85 million in cash and more than US$6 million in product this year, the seventh in an 11-year contract with a total value of US$128 million.
Murray, the No. 1 high school recruit last year and already one of the top players for the nation’s second-ranked team, said she accepts she must wear Adidas as part of playing for the Cornhuskers.
Photo: AP
“I think if I had the option to wear another shoe, I’d 100 percent pick Avoli,” she said. “Obviously, that’s not really an option.”
College athletes should be able to wear shoes of their choice, said Ramogi Huma, the executive director of the advocacy group College Athletes Players Association.
Limiting athletes to the brand with which their school is affiliated creates two problems, he said. First, it prevents athletes from achieving their full NIL earning potential, because they cannot wear the shoes in competition, when they get the most attention. Second, an athlete’s performance could be compromised if the shoes they are wearing do not fit properly.
“It’s a health and safety issue,” Huma said. “If your foot is being squeezed, that’s a problem. Look at volleyball players. A lot of them are tall, and they may have wider feet than the average person. Everybody is made differently.”
Footwear is an issue in any sport, but the movements associated with volleyball make it critical to have the right fit, Le said.
“Volleyball is one of the most jumping-related sports,” she said. “The shoe — especially with ankle stability and the ability to move laterally and vertically without feeling in danger of hurting yourself — is very important.”
It would be rare for a college athlete to wear a shoe other than the school sponsor’s brand.
For example, the Adidas contract with Nebraska says if an athlete experiences injury, pain or discomfort serious enough to affect performance, Adidas is given an opportunity to remedy the problem. If the problem persists, the athlete can wear another brand, but its logo must be covered.
Nike contracts have similar language. Typically, an independent physician must verify the athlete’s need for an exception.
Missouri in 2021 considered, but did not pass, an amendment to its NIL state law that would have allowed athletes to wear shoes of their choice in mandatory team activities. New Mexico passed a bill last year giving athletes freedom to choose their shoes but that language was removed during this year’s session.
New Mexico Senator Antonio Maestas, one of the original bill’s cosponsors, said he did not know how that happened.
Murray said she has switched between volleyball and basketball shoes over the years.
Heinrich said she wore volleyball shoes she did not really like when she was a high-school and club player and settled on Nike basketball shoes at Texas because she found they gave her foot more support.
Le has worn volleyball shoes since she was little, mainly because she found basketball shoes to be too heavy and wide for her.
The athletic shoe giants all have lines of volleyball shoes, but Avoli cofounders Mark Oleson and Rick Anguilla said their brand is fully dedicated to what they believe is an underserved market.
A feature of the Avoli shoe are tiny holes in the soles to provide ventilation, something young players said they wanted.
Oleson and Anguilla, who have years of experience in various aspects of the athletic shoe business with different brands, declined to criticize their giant competitors.
“Are they making bad volleyball shoes?” Oleson said. “I would say what we’re doing is we’re making a very specific volleyball shoe for the female athlete, how she moves, jumps, squats, pivots, dives and how she’s basically going to live throughout her entire tournament.”
Adidas spokeswoman Sophie LeRoux said in an e-mail that her company’s volleyball shoes are “built with a women’s first approach” and designed in collaboration with professional and amateur players.
Adidas has partnerships with volleyball federations in Europe and China, as well as throughout North America.
LeRoux declined comment on the company’s sponsorship contracts with colleges, while Nike did not respond to messages.
Avoli is content to sell its volleyball products to younger players and is not worried about penetrating the college sponsorship market, Anguilla said.
“With somebody like Harper Murray or any of the athletes we’ve signed to NIL deals, they’re reaching 25, 50, 100,000 people on their social media,” Anguilla said. “When we start thinking about the audience, NIL is going to really impact the value of those all-school contracts long-term. If we can use athletes to bring awareness to our product, and if the product is great, we like that equation.”
That does not help athletes who cannot wear the shoes they would like in competition.
Harper said that she has no problem with Adidas shoes — she just likes the support and feel of her Avolis better.
The matter of shoes is personal to Huma, a former University of California, Los Angeles football player who said he had to have foot surgery in 1996 because of ill-fitting shoes.
Huma said college athletes should get a cut of the revenue from school apparel contracts and that, as partners with the schools, athletes could agree to wear socks, wristbands, headbands and other accessories under those contracts.
Shoes, Huma said, are different because certain brands do not always provide an optimal fit.
“Wearing the same jersey isn’t going to be an issue when it comes to your health,” he said. “Shoes? That matters a lot.”
Nissan Motor Co has agreed to sell its global headquarters in Yokohama for ￥97 billion (US$630 million) to a group sponsored by Taiwanese autoparts maker Minth Group (敏實集團), as the struggling automaker seeks to shore up its financial position. The acquisition is led by a special purchase company managed by KJR Management Ltd, a Japanese real-estate unit of private equity giant KKR & Co, people familiar with the matter said. KJR said it would act as asset manager together with Mizuho Real Estate Management Co. Nissan is undergoing a broad cost-cutting campaign by eliminating jobs and shuttering plants as it grapples
PERSISTENT RUMORS: Nvidia’s CEO said the firm is not in talks to sell AI chips to China, but he would welcome a change in US policy barring the activity Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) said his company is not in discussions to sell its Blackwell artificial intelligence (AI) chips to Chinese firms, waving off speculation it is trying to engineer a return to the world’s largest semiconductor market. Huang, who arrived in Taiwan yesterday ahead of meetings with longtime partner Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), took the opportunity to clarify recent comments about the US-China AI race. The Nvidia head caused a stir in an interview this week with the Financial Times, in which he was quoted as saying “China will win” the AI race. Huang yesterday said
TEMPORARY TRUCE: China has made concessions to ease rare earth trade controls, among others, while Washington holds fire on a 100% tariff on all Chinese goods China is effectively suspending implementation of additional export controls on rare earth metals and terminating investigations targeting US companies in the semiconductor supply chain, the White House announced. The White House on Saturday issued a fact sheet outlining some details of the trade pact agreed to earlier in the week by US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that aimed to ease tensions between the world’s two largest economies. Under the deal, China is to issue general licenses valid for exports of rare earths, gallium, germanium, antimony and graphite “for the benefit of US end users and their suppliers
Dutch chipmaker Nexperia BV’s China unit yesterday said that it had established sufficient inventories of finished goods and works-in-progress, and that its supply chain remained secure and stable after its parent halted wafer supplies. The Dutch company suspended supplies of wafers to its Chinese assembly plant a week ago, calling it “a direct consequence of the local management’s recent failure to comply with the agreed contractual payment terms,” Reuters reported on Friday last week. Its China unit called Nexperia’s suspension “unilateral” and “extremely irresponsible,” adding that the Dutch parent’s claim about contractual payment was “misleading and highly deceptive,” according to a statement
RSS