Leaders of the largest US chipmakers told US government officials last week that US President Joe Biden’s administration should study the impact of restrictions on exports to China and pause before implementing new ones, according to people familiar with their discussions.
During meetings in Washington on Monday, Intel Corp CEO Pat Gelsinger, Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) and Qualcomm Inc CEO Cristiano Amon warned that export controls risk harming US leadership of the industry.
The Biden officials listened to the presentations, but did not make any commitments, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the talks were private.
Photo: Reuters
The chip industry is trying to navigate increasing tensions between China and the US. Companies are being forced to curb shipments to their largest market by Washington, which has cited national security concerns about the Asian nation acquiring certain capabilities.
One of the executives against current rules restricting the export of artificial intelligence (AI) hardware to China, saying the policy has not achieved the intended outcome of slowing China’s AI development.
The Biden team has been exploring ways to further tighten existing curbs — for example, by targeting chips made by Nvidia specifically for the Chinese market, according to people familiar with the matter.
US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said on Friday he agreed with the executives that the approach needs to be a “small yard, high fence” — effective but limited. He defended the administration’s actions to date as just that, saying the measures were targeted and had virtually no impact on US-China trade for most chips.
“The vast majority of sales of chips designed by the United States to China has continued unabated,” he said at the Aspen Security Forum. “It continues to this day.”
He hinted that more curbs could follow, but that they would only be implemented after robust discussion with the affected companies.
“We are going to continue to look at very targeted, very specific restrictions on technology with national security and military applications and make judgments rigorously, carefully, methodically — and, yes, in deep consultation with our private sector,” he said.
During the discussion on Monday, Gelsinger told Sullivan, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and other officials that further restricting what his company does in China puts at risk a key Biden policy of bringing back chip production to the US, the people said.
Without orders from Chinese customers, there will be much less need to go ahead with projects such as Intel’s planned factory complex in Ohio, the executive said, according to the people.
Huang said limiting sales of some Nvidia chips in China had just made alternatives more popular.
Overall, the executives argued that while Chinese customers have been forced to buy more chips to do the work of banned products, that has not significantly slowed them down. The availability and quality of software they’re using more than compensates for any hardware restrictions, they said.
Gelsinger, who also spoke at the Aspen Security Forum, mentioned the meetings in Washington during his appearance on Wednesday.
“We did communicate a very important message on China,” he said. “Right now, China represents 25 percent to 30 percent of semiconductor exports. If I have 20 or 30 percent less market, I need to build less factories.”
It is in the interest of the US to allow its chip companies access to the Chinese market in general because revenue from that country helps fuel research and development, he said. And that is needed to keep the nation’s lead in new technology such as quantum computing.
Qualcomm gets more than 60 percent of its revenue from the China region, where it supplies components to smartphone makers such as Xiaomi Corp (小米).
Gelsinger, who visited Beijing this month to show off his company’s latest AI chips, counts the nation as Intel’s biggest sales region, with China providing about a quarter of its revenue. For Nvidia, China provides about a fifth of sales.
Chip equipment makers such as Applied Materials Inc have taken the biggest revenue hits, but the restrictions, which companies fear will be extended to other chips, are also affecting some device makers.
IN THE AIR: While most companies said they were committed to North American operations, some added that production and costs would depend on the outcome of a US trade probe Leading local contract electronics makers Wistron Corp (緯創), Quanta Computer Inc (廣達), Inventec Corp (英業達) and Compal Electronics Inc (仁寶) are to maintain their North American expansion plans, despite Washington’s 20 percent tariff on Taiwanese goods. Wistron said it has long maintained a presence in the US, while distributing production across Taiwan, North America, Southeast Asia and Europe. The company is in talks with customers to align capacity with their site preferences, a company official told the Taipei Times by telephone on Friday. The company is still in talks with clients over who would bear the tariff costs, with the outcome pending further
WEAKER ACTIVITY: The sharpest deterioration was seen in the electronics and optical components sector, with the production index falling 13.2 points to 44.5 Taiwan’s manufacturing sector last month contracted for a second consecutive month, with the purchasing managers’ index (PMI) slipping to 48, reflecting ongoing caution over trade uncertainties, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. The decline reflects growing caution among companies amid uncertainty surrounding US tariffs, semiconductor duties and automotive import levies, and it is also likely linked to fading front-loading activity, CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) said. “Some clients have started shifting orders to Southeast Asian countries where tariff regimes are already clear,” Lien told a news conference. Firms across the supply chain are also lowering stock levels to mitigate
NEGOTIATIONS: Semiconductors play an outsized role in Taiwan’s industrial and economic development and are a major driver of the Taiwan-US trade imbalance With US President Donald Trump threatening to impose tariffs on semiconductors, Taiwan is expected to face a significant challenge, as information and communications technology (ICT) products account for more than 70 percent of its exports to the US, Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) said on Friday. Compared with other countries, semiconductors play a disproportionately large role in Taiwan’s industrial and economic development, Lien said. As the sixth-largest contributor to the US trade deficit, Taiwan recorded a US$73.9 billion trade surplus with the US last year — up from US$47.8 billion in 2023 — driven by strong
RESHAPING COMMERCE: Major industrialized economies accepted 15 percent duties on their products, while charges on items from Mexico, Canada and China are even bigger US President Donald Trump has unveiled a slew of new tariffs that boosted the average US rate on goods from across the world, forging ahead with his turbulent effort to reshape international commerce. The baseline rates for many trading partners remain unchanged at 10 percent from the duties Trump imposed in April, easing the worst fears of investors after the president had previously said they could double. Yet his move to raise tariffs on some Canadian goods to 35 percent threatens to inject fresh tensions into an already strained relationship, while nations such as Switzerland and New Zealand also saw increased
RSS