Three years after Luxembourg declared all public transport free in a bid to clear its roads of jams and cut pollution, the car is still king of the congested grand duchy.
Traffic permitting, it is barely an hour’s drive from Weiswampach in the far north of Luxembourg near the German and Belgian borders to Dudelange in the south, next door to France.
The wealthy country of just 650,000 people appeared the perfect place for a bold experiment — making public transport on trains, trams and buses free nationwide.
Photo: AFP
However, Luxembourg, despite its lack of long-distance highways, has one of the highest rates of vehicle ownership in Europe, with only Poland exceeding its rate of 681 vehicles per 1,000 residents.
Cross-border workers bring in tens of thousands more vehicles every day as commuters head to jobs in Luxembourg, and long-distance drivers often pass by to fill their tanks in a country with low fuel taxes.
“I often say that Germans build cars and Luxembourgers buy them,” joked Luxembourgian Deputy Prime Minister Francois Bausch, who is in charge of mobility and public works.
Photo: AFP
Three years after ticket offices closed, there is no sign that Luxembourg has ditched vehicles for the tram, even if Bausch sees a thinning of traffic in the capital.
“Car culture is truly dominant and it remains pretty tricky to attract motorists onboard public transport,” said Merlin Gillard, a mobility expert at the Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research.
Luxembourg, along with the rest of the EU, is attempting to transform itself into a carbon neutral economy by adopting green technologies in transport, energy, factories and farms.
Luxembourgian Prime Minister Xavier Bettel’s coalition government invests 800 million euros (US$863 million) a year on public transportation.
The duchy has Europe’s highest-funded tram network per capita, costing 500 euros per person each year.
“It is the country that invests the most in Europe, but Luxembourg is coming from far behind,” Gillard said. “We’re making up for investment that has been very weak for years.”
In Luxembourg City, a modern financial services center built around an historic old town nestling in tight loops of the Alzette River, passengers appreciate the changes.
The central station is undergoing a thorough renovation, an ultra-modern funicular links the upper town to the riverside, and road lanes have been set aside for buses and trams.
Most of all, though, and uniquely in Europe: The network is free.
Edgar Bisenius, owner of a financial services business, said this is the prime consideration when choosing between a vehicle and the bus.
“It’s very positive for the environment,” he said.
French-language teacher Ben Dratwicki travels around the capital by bicycle on personal business, but takes the funicular and the train to get to his school 20km north of the city.
“Transport is a basic right for residents,” he said. “If we have the right to work, we should also have the right to be taken to work, without paying over the odds.”
However, Dratwicki seems to be in a minority across the country, where traffic jams of private vehicles still block major arteries during rush hour.
Part of the explanation might be the 220,000 cross-border workers, vital to Luxembourg’s economy, who arrive every day from neighboring countries to earn higher wages.
The trains and buses they could board in France, Belgium or Germany are not free until they cross into Luxembourg, and many daily workers remain wedded to their vehicles.
Bausch, of the Green Party, has a plan to help some of the French workers, who after all pay their income taxes in Luxembourg.
He aims to finance car parks on the French side of the border, and has promised that from 2027 or 2028 there would be a train from the French town of Thionville to Luxembourg every seven minutes.
However, experts like Gillard are skeptical, saying the problem is embedded in the underlying structure of Luxembourg’s economy.
French workers cannot afford rents or property in Luxembourg, but much of the cash they save by living at home is wasted on the busy and polluting commute to work, Gillard said.
REASSURANCE: The company, which installed new equipment in its Taichung plant, said that it would produce 1-gamma nanometers node DRAMs in Taiwan in 2025 US-based memorychip supplier Micron Technology Inc on Friday said that it would start producing its most advanced DRAM exclusively in Taiwan in 2025. Micron said that it would mass produce chips using its advanced 1-gamma process node DRAM in Taiwan, ahead of any other production site worldwide. The company installed cutting-edge extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography production equipment in its A3 fab in Taichung last year. The 1-gamma process — its third-generation 10 nanometer-class node — was jointly developed by Micron’s research and development (R&D) teams in Taiwan and Japan. Micron on Thursday said it would invest up to US$3.6 billion in Japan. A Ministry
MARKET GAP: If China stops buying chips from US firm Micron, they might turn to competitors such as Nanya and South Korean suppliers, researchers said Nanya Technology Corp (南亞科技) shares rallied nearly 4 percent during early trading yesterday amid optimism that the nation’s biggest DRAM chipmaker would benefit from China’s latest ban on purchasing memory chips from Micron Technology Inc. The restrictions are widely considered a result of an escalating technology dispute between the US and China. Chinese firms might shift orders to non-US suppliers such as Nanya Technology and South Korean memory chipmakers Samsung Electronics Co and SK Hynix Inc. The Cyberspace Administration of China on Sunday night said that its review found that Micron’s memory chips pose serious network security risks to the country’s critical
SECURITY RISK: Chinese companies could respond to the announcement by moving away from all products made by the US firm, diverting business toward Korean rivals China delivered the latest salvo in an escalating semiconductor war with the US, announcing that Micron Technology Inc products have failed to pass a cybersecurity review in the country. Operators of key infrastructure in China should not buy the company’s goods, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) said in a statement on Sunday, adding that it found “relatively serious” cybersecurity risks in Micron products sold in China. The components caused “significant security risks to our critical information infrastructure supply chain,” which would affect national security, it said. The results come more than a month after China announced an investigation on imports from
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) senior vice president of business development Kevin Zhang (張曉強) told reporters yesterday that talks over a possible plant in Germany are continuing and that the earliest decision would be in August. “I don’t want to get into the politics side of the thing, but I do think that there is a need for us to provide our customers with a diverse supply,” Zhang said, adding that Europe is a “very significant geography given the customer base ... [and] the demand.” Zhang did not confirm the size of subsidy or cost of the potential project or
RSS