US trade flows are realigning on the back of COVID-19 pandemic shocks and tensions with China, but efforts to reduce interdependence between the superpowers have not brought a swift decoupling.
While security concerns have escalated and US imports from China fell after Washington and Beijing imposed tit-for-tat tariffs, trade has since climbed again.
The numbers could rise further when last year’s trade data is released next month, pointing to how interlaced the world’s two biggest economies are.
Photo: Bloomberg
However, experts have said that tensions are leaving their mark in other ways.
“US imports from China are well below the trend that they were on before the trade war started,” Peterson Institute for International Economics senior fellow Mary Lovely said.
“There is definitely a turn away from China in US imports, especially or primarily in those goods on which the US raised tariffs,” Lovely said.
After the trade dispute began, the value of US goods imported from China dropped from US$506 billion in 2017 to about US$450 billion in 2019.
Bilateral relations are not the only factors affecting trade. The pandemic took a heavy toll as well.
China in November last year experienced its sharpest drop in exports since the start of COVID-19, with business activity slammed by its strict “zero COVID” policy.
Also weighing on imports is an “ongoing shift in the US away from spending on goods,” Oxford Economics chief US economist Ryan Sweet said.
Americans spent heavily on imported products during the pandemic, but “people are going back out and spending on services” as virus concerns ease, Sweet said.
This cuts into demand for goods and can help explain why numbers have not surged more, he added.
For now, US government figures through to November show that total US-China trade last year could have approached or hit a high.
“Going forward, you’re going to see more diversification,” as opposed to a complete cut-off of shipments from China, Sweet said.
Auto manufacturers, for example, experienced supply chain problems during the pandemic.
Increasing climate-related disruptions are also “raising the risks of overconcentrated supply chains in one firm or one geographic area,” said Robert Koopman, a lecturer at American University and a former WTO chief economist.
Meanwhile, the administration of US President Joe Biden is trying to make the US more self-reliant in specific sectors such as semiconductors.
“The recent [Inflation Reduction Act] and CHIPS Act, and related sanctions, are clear indicators of the Biden administration’s efforts to decouple from China” in these areas, Koopman said.
“As companies reassess risk and review the current state of their supply chains, one consistent outcome is movement... away from China to other countries,” Center for Strategic and International Studies senior fellow Emily Benson said.
These are countries in Southeast Asia and some others closer to the US.
“While this trend is growing, it resembles sand leaking out of a bag more than it does a tsunami,” she said.
It is likely “too early” for definitive comments on industries, but US export controls “are going to force some decoupling” over time in technology or areas where semiconductors are key, Benson said.
Some business has moved from China to countries like Vietnam or Mexico.
“There’s definitely been some substitution of suppliers,” Lovely said, adding that is fueled partly by Chinese investors who have opened factories outside their home country.
“In Mexico, it’s a different story,” Lovely said. “There has been some Chinese investment, but a lot of it is multinationals who were moving closer to the US.”
However, countries such as Mexico need domestic reforms to boost competitiveness and lower implicit trade costs before reaping greater benefits, Koopman said.
US goods imported from the EU are also catching up, with year-to-date numbers for last year reaching US$504.4 billion in November last year. This was above the US$499.5 billion worth of goods from China over the same period.
However, economists point to a post-pandemic uptick in commercial activity worldwide to explain the trend.
“These figures are a small snapshot and are more likely representative of the global economy returning to pre-pandemic levels than any specific decoupling movement,” Benson said.
As China recovers from an infections surge after easing COVID-19 rules, it also expects a noticeable rise in imports, Chinese Vice Premier Liu He (劉鶴) said earlier this month in Davos, Switzerland.
UNCERTAINTY: Investors remain worried that trade negotiations with Washington could go poorly, given Trump’s inconsistency on tariffs in his second term, experts said The consumer confidence index this month fell for a ninth consecutive month to its lowest level in 13 months, as global trade uncertainties and tariff risks cloud Taiwan’s economic outlook, a survey released yesterday by National Central University found. The biggest decline came from the timing for stock investments, which plunged 11.82 points to 26.82, underscoring bleak investor confidence, it said. “Although the TAIEX reclaimed the 21,000-point mark after the US and China agreed to bury the hatchet for 90 days, investors remain worried that the situation would turn sour later,” said Dachrahn Wu (吳大任), director of the university’s Research Center for
Alchip Technologies Ltd (世芯), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) designer specializing in artificial-intelligence (AI) chips, yesterday said that small-volume production of 3-nanometer (nm) chips for a key customer is on track to start by the end of this year, dismissing speculation about delays in producing advanced chips. As Alchip is transitioning from 7-nanometer and 5-nanometer process technology to 3 nanometers, investors and shareholders have been closely monitoring whether the company is navigating through such transition smoothly. “We are proceeding well in [building] this generation [of chips]. It appears to me that no revision will be required. We have achieved success in designing
PROJECTION: KGI Financial said that based on its foreign exchange exposure, a NT$0.1 increase in the New Taiwan dollar would negatively impact it by about NT$1.7 billion KGI Financial Holding Co (凱基金控) yesterday said its life insurance arm has increased hedging and adopted other moves to curb the impact of the local currency’s appreciation on its profitability. “It is difficult to accurately depict the hedging costs, which might vary from 7 percent to 40 percent in a single day,” KGI Life Insurance Co (凱基人壽) told an investors’ conference in Taipei. KGI Life, which underpinned 66 percent of the group’s total net income last year, has elevated hedging to 55 to 60 percent, while using a basket of currencies to manage currency volatility, the insurer said. As different
Taiwanese insurers are facing difficult questions about the damage of recent swings in the New Taiwan dollar. Regulators might have a partial solution: letting firms change how they calculate the value of foreign currency assets. The Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) is considering allowing insurers to use six-month average exchange rates when they calculate risk-based capital in their semiannual reports, a shift from the current system where insurers use exchange rates on the final day of reporting. The change could ease pressure on the US$1.2 trillion insurance sector, whose huge exposure to foreign assets came into the spotlight earlier this month after a
RSS