Sun, Dec 11, 2022 page12

• Colgate’s 9bn toothpaste tubes defy effort to recycle them

  For many facilities in the US, the company’s new recyclable tubes are indistinguishable from those made from more common plactics, prompting recyclers to reject them

  • By Daniela Sirtori-Cortina / Bloomberg
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Colgate-Palmolive Co spent years devising a recyclable toothpaste tube. Pulling it off was a technical masterstroke, substituting plastic for a mix of materials that was historically tough to reclaim. The result was “nice squeezability,” one executive said.

  One big problem remains: Many sorting centers in the US and elsewhere do not accept them.

  The gap between Colgate’s engineering success and the practicalities of where-do-we-toss-our-empties underscores a persistent challenge for the corporate US: Switching to packaging that can bypass landfills is not enough if there is no easy way to recycle it. In Colgate’s case, that is 9 billion tubes a year requiring extra effort to avoid the trash heap.

  

  A worker carries compressed plastic bottles at a recycling facility in Cairo on Sept. 15.

  Photo: AP

  The new tubes, which cover 78 percent of the company’s US toothpaste lineup, are made with high-density polyethylene (HDPE), the recyclable plastic used for products such as milk jugs.

  In the fragmented US system, however, companies making recyclable products have to persuade a wide range of stakeholders, from local governments to private companies, to accept the items, sort them and turn them into something new. It is a process that can take years. The tubes are still not classified as recyclable by How2Recycle, an organization that issues standardized labels with instructions on how to dispose of packaging.

  Goods eligible for collection vary by community, and an estimated 40 million US households do not have access to recycling services from their homes. This all means that plastics get reclaimed at rates of only 8 to 28 percent, depending on the type.

  

  A recyclable toothpaste tube and toothbrushes are pictured in New York on Wednesday.

  Photo: Bloomberg

  In light of the challenge, Colgate said it has engaged players across the supply chain for years. It has also shared its new tube design with other companies, and said competitors would adopt similar recyclable plastic tubes by 2025.

  “It is not easy work, given the many aspects of the process, but we are committed, and we believe we are on the right path,” Colgate said.

  The company has pledged to shrink its plastic waste and use “100 percent recyclable, reusable or compostable plastic packaging by 2025,” it said.

  Sarah Dearman, chief innovation officer at the Recycling Partnership, an industry-funded group working to improve the system, said the new tubes are “a great step.”

  However, consumers must also have access to collection systems that accept the tube.

  It is not clear how many do, nationwide assessment by the Sustainable Packaging Coalition, an industry working group said.

  Colgate said the tube has a third-party certification showing it can be processed alongside HDPE bottles, which 87 percent of Americans can put in recycling bins.

  That type of plastic ends up being recycled nearly 30 percent of the time, one of the highest rates among recyclable materials in the US.

  However, Colgate said that acceptance might still be limited and advised consumers to check with local community programs.

  The company started updating the artwork on its boxes to provide more information.

  Some consumers are taking note.

  Ethan Helvering, a tech worker living in Los Angeles, said he was looking for sustainable toothpaste alternatives when he stumbled upon Colgate’s new tube. He sees recyclability as a selling point and is glad to see the company’s efforts, although he has questions about what ultimately happens.

  “If there’s an option to put something in the recycling, I’ll do it,” Helvering said. “Hopefully processes improve and at some point it becomes an actual reality.”

  Colgate’s new tubes usually get sorted to the correct group once they reach plants that recover materials and bundle similar plastics together, a test commissioned by the company showed.

  However, most US recovery facilities do not take tubes because the recyclable and traditional versions are so similar, said Sandeep Kulkarni, a technical consultant at the Association of Plastic Recyclers, a trade group.

  The old tubes could cause contamination if consumers put them in the recycling bin, so it is still easier for recycling facilities to reject toothpaste tubes across the board, he said.

  Waste Management Inc, which offers recycling and disposal services, said the tubes are not in its list of acceptable items.

  Another concern is leftover toothpaste causing contamination, said Pete Keller, an executive at waste disposal company Republic Services Inc.

  It is another area that seems to have discrepancies: On its Web site, Colgate says any residual toothpaste in the tubes is removed during the rinsing process at recycling facilities.

  Together, Waste Management and Republic Services run about one-quarter of US materials-recovery facilities tracked by the Recycling Partnership, which said processing capacity is also an important factor.

  Sander Defruyt, who leads a plastics-reduction initiative at the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, said that given the challenges of recycling, companies should invest more in alternatives such as reusable containers and packaging.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Napoli’s title hopes shaken by late Genoa equalizer

  • 2

    Privately owned city in Kenya taking on corrupt officials

  • 3

    MOE to encourage foreigners to work in Taiwan

  • 4

    Kane tastes first title as Bayern bid farewell to Mueller

  • 5

    Former president Tsai departs for Lithuania