Automakers and tech companies face a bumpy road to clearing regulatory roadblocks to deploying autonomous vehicles without human controls on public roads in the US, industry officials and lawmakers said.
On Wednesday, Ford Motor Co and Volkswagen AG said they would shutter self-driving start-up Argo AI, saying the technology was a long way off.
The same is true when it comes to rules around the technology.
Photo: Reuters
Legislation in the US Congress has been stalled for more than five years over how to amend regulations to encompass self-driving vehicles, including the scope of consumer and legal protections.
US regulators have given no indication when they might act on petitions to initially approve a few thousand self-driving vehicles on US roads without steering wheels or brake pedals.
Officials with the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on Thursday declined to say when they might act.
US Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg earlier this month said he has “very high hopes for the theoretical possibility that self-driving cars and high-tech cars will save thousands and thousands of lives because human beings have a basically murderous track record as drivers of cars. But we’re not there yet.”
Some in the industry and in Washington also see developing self-driving vehicle technology as a competitive issue.
Many lawmakers and the industry have urged Buttigieg to develop a comprehensive federal framework for autonomous vehicles, warning that the US could lose the autonomous vehicles race to China.
“We lag behind in shaping a regulatory framework that will foster this innovation, while simultaneously protecting and encouraging all of the important benefits we believe autonomous vehicles are capable of delivering,” a dozen Democratic US senators wrote in April.
The letter cited efforts by competitors, particularly China, who “have significantly invested in autonomous and connected vehicle technologies.”
The issue has taken on new urgency as US traffic deaths have soared since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, rising 10.5 percent last year to 42,915. That marked the highest number killed in a year since 2005.
Advocates say autonomous vehicles have the potential to reduce traffic deaths, expand mobility access to the disabled, reduce the need for parking in congested cities and cut greenhouse gas emissions.
In July, the NHTSA, part of the US Department of Transportation, opened for comment petitions filed by General Motors (GM) and Ford asking the regulatory agency to grant exemptions to deploy up to 2,500 self-driving vehicles without human controls such as steering wheels and brake pedals annually per manufacturer.
Neither automaker seeks approval to sell self-driving vehicles to consumers.
GM wants to deploy the Cruise Origin, a vehicle with subway-like doors and no steering wheels developed by San Francisco-based Cruise.
GM said the vehicle would require passengers to buckle seat belts prior to the start of their autonomous ride.
The Detroit automaker faces resistance.
Following a GM petition as well as a June crash involving an autonomous vehicle, the City and County of San Francisco said that GM and Cruise failed to provide sufficient data and fell “short of documenting or analyzing the safety performance” of the self-driving vehicles.
Cruise said that the “overwhelming majority of public comments submitted on the Cruise Origin are positive, underscoring the vehicle’s sustainability and accessibility benefits and support for American jobs.”
In 2017, the US House of Representatives passed legislation to speed the adoption of self-driving vehicles and bar states from setting performance standards, but the bill never passed the US Senate.
“We’re working hard to find that common ground to get something that we can pass,” US Representative Debbie Dingell of Michigan said in July.
SECOND-RATE: Models distilled from US products do not perform the same as the original and undo measures that ensure the systems are neutral, the US’ cable said The US Department of State has ordered a global push to bring attention to what it said are widespread efforts by Chinese companies, including artificial intelligence (AI) start-up DeepSeek (深度求索), to steal intellectual property from US AI labs, according to a diplomatic cable. The cable, dated Friday and sent to diplomatic and consular posts around the world, instructs diplomatic staff to speak to their foreign counterparts about “concerns over adversaries’ extraction and distillation of US AI models.” Distillation is the process of training smaller AI models using output from larger, more expensive ones to lower the costs of training a powerful new
Shares of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) have repeatedly hit new highs, but an equity analyst said the stock’s valuation remains within a reasonable range and any pullback would likely be technical. The contract chipmaker’s historical price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio has ranged between 20 and 30, Cathay Futures Consultant Co (國泰證期) analyst Tsai Ming-han (蔡明翰) told Central News Agency. With market consensus projecting that TSMC would post earnings per share of about NT$100 (US$3.17) this year, supported by strong global demand for artificial intelligence (AI) applications, and the stock currently trading at a P/E ratio of below 25, Tsai said the valuation
The artificial intelligence (AI) boom has triggered a seismic reshuffling of global equity markets, with Taiwan and South Korea muscling past European nations one by one. With its stock market now valued at nearly US$4.3 trillion, Taiwan surpassed the UK, Europe’s biggest market, earlier this month, data compiled by Bloomberg showed. South Korea is about US$140 billion away from doing the same. The tech-heavy Asian markets have shot past Germany and France in the past seven months. The shift is largely down to massive gains in shares of three companies that provide essential hardware for AI: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電),
The US Department of Commerce last week ordered multiple chip equipment companies to halt shipments of certain tools to China’s second-largest chipmaker, Hua Hong Semiconductor Ltd (華虹半導體), its latest action to slow the country’s development of advanced chips, two people familiar with the matter said. The department sent letters to at least a handful of companies informing them of restrictions on tools and other materials destined for two Hua Hong facilities US officials believe make China’s most sophisticated chips, the people said. Top US chip equipment companies Lam Research Corp, Applied Materials Inc and KLA Corp, each of which has significant
RSS