Sandeep Nijhawan brought four business ideas, each addressing rising global temperatures, to his March 2020 meeting with an investor at the Bill Gates-founded Breakthrough Energy Ventures (BEV). Freshly departed from founding two start-ups — one on hydrogen, another on batteries — Nijhawan had just seven slides to show. The first pitch in his deck was to make iron without coal, intense heat or emissions, powered by only renewable electricity.
“Let me stop you right there,” BEV investor Dave Danielson told him. “If you could do this thing, then that’s what I would do. I don’t want to hear the next three ideas.”
Iron makes up 98 percent of the substance in steel, the ubiquitous material that has built the modern world. In furnaces heated by coal to more than 1,400°C, the carbon in coal combines with the oxygen in iron ore to separate out impurities and unwanted oxygen atoms, releasing huge amounts of carbon dioxide.
The iron later goes through a series of steps to be turned into steel, but the iron-creation step accounts for 90 percent of the greenhouse gas generated. Steel production is responsible for 7 percent of greenhouse-gas emissions dumped into the air each year — more than the climate impact of shipping and aviation combined.
Producing iron at lukewarm temperatures and without coal would skip the most emissions-heavy step without relying on expensive technologies.
That is why Nijhawan’s idea caught Danielson’s attention: Affordable green steel is a big deal, and could disrupt an industry that generates more than US$870 billion in revenues each year.
With the green light to go ahead and US$2.25 million from BEV and other investors, Nijhawan started Electra — in stealth mode — to do just that.
Stereotypically for a start-up, Electra began its experiments in a garage. Nijhawan’s former colleague Quoc Pham joined as chief technology officer. His first job was to figure out whether it was possible to dissolve iron ore in water laced with acid.
Failure came within weeks. “I have bad news for you,” Pham told Nijhawan. “This could be the shortest start-up of my life.”
To understand what went wrong, the three known ways in which emissions can be cut from steelmaking should be looked at.
First, capture emissions generated by the process and bury them deep underground. The first such plant was built in 2016 in the United Arab Emirates, but thanks to the upfront expense of carbon-capture technology, none have since been built.
Second, use hydrogen as a replacement for coal. The first shipment of steel made using hydrogen was produced last year, but commercial volumes are unlikely to be available until 2026.
However, as hydrogen made from renewable electricity is still more expensive than coal, companies are forced to use high-grade iron ore, which there is not that much of.
“The world is running out of high-grade ores that are available for steelmaking,” Nijhawan said.
Third, use electricity. Metals like aluminum, copper and zinc are made using electricity — admittedly, in much smaller amounts than iron. Until electricity became cheap, it was not economical to think about applying it to iron production.
However, electricity cannot by passed through solid iron ore. One solution is to melt it. That is what Boston Metal Co, a start-up founded in 2012, has done. For the past 10 years, it has been perfecting and scaling the technology, which works by heating iron ore to 1,400°C using enough electricity to power thousands of homes, and concentrating it into a metal box not much bigger than a dumpster.
Concentrating that much electricity into such a small area has to be done using special materials. Boston Metal can achieve it using carbon as an electrode — a piece of equipment that allows energy to flow through without itself melting — but that too generates carbon dioxide, defeating the purpose of using green electricity.
Boston Metal found an alternative material made up of iron and chromium, but so far it only works on a pilot scale.
Nijhawan did not want to melt anything. Once a process is running at molten-metal temperatures, it has to run 24 hours and 365 days. If it does stop, the ore solidifies and new vats need to be put in place, causing months of delay.
So the process had to be “benign from a temperature perspective,” Nijhawan said, adding that should not be hotter than the temperature at which “coffee is brewed.”
That would allow for easy start and stop, and make it possible to rely on intermittent renewables, but making the process work at such a low temperature required Pham to dissolve iron ore in water laced with acid.
“My pitch to all [the investors] was: ‘Look, I don’t know if this can be done. I’ve thought through the problem and asked the experts. I think there’s a feasible path,” Nijhawan said. “All I need is less than 10 people and maybe a year or year-and-a-half to run this thing to the ground.”
He did not have to wait that long. Pham went back to the drawing board, read scientific literature and consulted experts, including Dan Steingart, professor of chemical metallurgy at Columbia University.
After weeks of trying new experiments, he found a successful workaround.
Electra is now exiting stealth mode, and refuses to publicly divulge its exact process.
However, Nijhawan and Pham have shared enough details for independent experts to confirm that what the company claims to do is technologically feasible.
“Electra has managed to pull off a difficult conversion going from iron oxide to iron using only electricity at such low temperatures,” Carnegie Mellon University associate professor Venkat Viswanathan said. “The steps they take trick iron to be in just the right state.”
A tour of the company’s Colorado facility also highlights its progress. There is no coal-fired furnace or molten metal, and lab demonstrations show how iron ore can be dissolved. After the electrical process is run, Electra produces plates the size of office paper with a thick layer of iron metal on them — silvery gray in appearance and surprisingly heavy.
The success of the experiments has helped Electra raise US$85 million in total from BEV, mining giant BHP Group, Singapore-based fund Temasek Holdings, Amazon.com Inc. and a few other investors. Now it just has to scale up the technology.
Electra is promising to build a facility next year that would have several commercial-sized iron plates; a few years after that, it plans to make thousands of plates in a larger factory.
With Swedish steel giant SSAB AB aiming to make commercial amounts of carbon-free steel by 2026 and Boston Metal promising to produce emissions-free iron by 2026, the race is officially on.
A full-sized commercial Electra plant would be much smaller than conventional steel plants, which can generate 2 million tonnes of steel per year, cost more than US$1 billion and are so large that entire towns spring up around them.
Electra aims to build plants that make only 300,000 tonnes of steel each year, a size that would enable the start-up to place itself near existing electric arc furnaces. These furnaces take scrap steel and recycle it, and can also use the iron Electra produces and tweak the process to make add more virgin iron than scrap steel.
Another advantage could be placing Electra plants close to iron ore mines, which are typically far from urban centers and near land where renewable power can be built. Electra plants could then process ore into iron on site while getting rid of all impurities, drastically reducing the volume of material that needs to be transported to a steel plant and further lowering costs.
It might even be Electra’s first commercial application. In coming up with a process to dissolve iron ore, the company has also managed to remove impurities much more easily than conventional steelmaking: At lower temperatures, the impurities do not chemically react as they would in a furnace at 1,600°C.
The world is sitting on billions of tonnes of low-grade iron ore. It might be possible for Electra to build factories close to those mines and make existing operations economically viable.
“Do or die in a start-up is real,” Nijhawan said. “You don’t have 10 years to develop new science. You have to be in that pressure cooker, to be honest with you, rather than having infinite time available and resources available to see what can be done in a different way.”
Taiwanese suppliers to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC, 台積電) are expected to follow the contract chipmaker’s step to invest in the US, but their relocation may be seven to eight years away, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. When asked by opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Niu Hsu-ting (牛煦庭) in the legislature about growing concerns that TSMC’s huge investments in the US will prompt its suppliers to follow suit, Kuo said based on the chipmaker’s current limited production volume, it is unlikely to lead its supply chain to go there for now. “Unless TSMC completes its planned six
Power supply and electronic components maker Delta Electronics Inc (台達電) yesterday said second-quarter revenue is expected to surpass the first quarter, which rose 30 percent year-on-year to NT$118.92 billion (US$3.71 billion). Revenue this quarter is likely to grow, as US clients have front-loaded orders ahead of US President Donald Trump’s planned tariffs on Taiwanese goods, Delta chairman Ping Cheng (鄭平) said at an earnings conference in Taipei, referring to the 90-day pause in tariff implementation Trump announced on April 9. While situations in the third and fourth quarters remain unclear, “We will not halt our long-term deployments and do not plan to
‘SHORT TERM’: The local currency would likely remain strong in the near term, driven by anticipated US trade pressure, capital inflows and expectations of a US Fed rate cut The US dollar is expected to fall below NT$30 in the near term, as traders anticipate increased pressure from Washington for Taiwan to allow the New Taiwan dollar to appreciate, Cathay United Bank (國泰世華銀行) chief economist Lin Chi-chao (林啟超) said. Following a sharp drop in the greenback against the NT dollar on Friday, Lin told the Central News Agency that the local currency is likely to remain strong in the short term, driven in part by market psychology surrounding anticipated US policy pressure. On Friday, the US dollar fell NT$0.953, or 3.07 percent, closing at NT$31.064 — its lowest level since Jan.
The New Taiwan dollar and Taiwanese stocks surged on signs that trade tensions between the world’s top two economies might start easing and as US tech earnings boosted the outlook of the nation’s semiconductor exports. The NT dollar strengthened as much as 3.8 percent versus the US dollar to 30.815, the biggest intraday gain since January 2011, closing at NT$31.064. The benchmark TAIEX jumped 2.73 percent to outperform the region’s equity gauges. Outlook for global trade improved after China said it is assessing possible trade talks with the US, providing a boost for the nation’s currency and shares. As the NT dollar