There is no end in sight to the US’ shortage of baby formula — and the crisis has highlighted the lack of competition that has spread to all parts of the US economy, even essential ones such as food for infants.
The problem “is not going to solve itself in a day or week,” US National Economic Council Director Brian Deese told CNN on Friday.
He was unable to say how long the crisis would last.
Initially caused by supply chain blockages and a lack of production workers due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the shortage was exacerbated in February when, after the death of two infants, manufacturer Abbott Laboratories announced a “voluntary recall” for formula made at its factory in Michigan and shut down that location.
The shortage has left many parents frantic and fearful their infants might starve. Formula is a necessity for many families, particularly in low-income households where mothers have to return to work almost immediately after giving birth and cannot breastfeed.
A further issue is that prices for the formula that remains have skyrocketed.
An investigation by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared Abbott’s formula, but made 483 “observations” about the factory, Abbott said in a statement on Friday.
“We immediately began implementing corrective actions and subject to FDA approval, we could restart our Sturgis, Mich, site within two weeks,” the company said.
The FDA promised to announce plans next week that would allow, among other things, the import of formula produced overseas.
The FDA bans most foreign infant formula, including products made in Europe, not because of health concerns, but due to labeling and packaging standards.
“We believe these and other ongoing efforts will help dramatically improve the supply in the US in a matter of weeks,” FDA Commissioner Robert Califf wrote on Twitter.
US President Joe Biden also said it “will be a matter of weeks or less” to start fully refilling shelves.
He said that stock levels in stores had begun to stabilize this week.
According to the data collection agency Datasembly, as of Tuesday, 43 percent of the usual formula supply was out of stock, up 10 percent from the April average.
Deese said that safety was key in solving the formula shortage and said that Biden’s administration had been running on all cylinders to try and provide enough supply.
Accused of a wait-and-see attitude or even indifference, the White House unveiled some measures on Thursday to tackle the issue, but the scope seemed limited.
Biden on Friday said that his administration had intervened as soon as it was aware of the problem, but that they had to “move with caution as well as speed.”
“The White House ... is considering all sorts of options for helping parents, which is good,” Amanda Starbuck, a research director at the Food & Water Watch group, a food safety non-governmental organization, told reporters.
She said the crisis was indicative of the problem with extreme concentration throughout the food production chain.
Three US companies control 95 percent of formula sales, Starbuck said.
“It matters a little less if ... we’re talking about soda or chips, but it matters a lot more when we’re talking about essential things like milk,” she said.
The current situation is the result of a decades-long movement. The concentration has benefited US companies that, in the absence of competition, have been able to agree on prices among themselves, Starbuck said.
“But the blame is not completely on these companies,” she said. “Why has our government allowed for ... just three companies to control so much?”
Not to mention that the companies’ giant size does not make them more efficient.
“It’s not efficient when there’s a single recall that affects every single parent across the country who needs to feed their child,” she said.
Starbuck said it is time to turn back the clock, even if it means dismantling the huge corporations.
“What we need to do now is pass comprehensive antitrust legislation in order to better scrutinize companies, to break up companies that have gotten so big that they’re abusing their market power,” she said.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would