Prospective investors in Life Insurance Corp of India’s (LIC) US$8 billion initial public offering (IPO) are seeking assurances from company management that it will not sacrifice their interests to meet goals set out by the Indian government, its controlling shareholder, sources said.
In virtual roadshows for India’s biggest ever public listing, LIC management and the IPO bankers have been peppered with questions about the insurer’s investments and their quality, four people with knowledge of the matter said.
LIC has in the past few years been a key buyer of shares in state-owned firms sold off by New Delhi, often bailing out less-than-successful public issues of shares. It has also been tapped to rescue struggling financial institutions.
Photo: Reuters
Potential conflicts of interest issues are taking center stage in the IPO roadshows, which began last week and are expected to go on till the end of the month, the sources said.
“The government tends to act as a regulator, manager and shareholder, and it tends to get its position confused at different points of time,” said Shriram Subramanian, founder of proxy advisory firm InGovern, who has not attended the roadshows.
“The government ministries may tend to think that LIC is 100 percent under their control and would like to exert that kind of an influence whenever required, and that is a concern for investors,” Subramanian said.
How effectively LIC and its investment bankers address the investor concerns will help in determining the insurer’s valuation in the float, and consequently the state of finances of the Indian government, which is banking on proceeds from the IPO to plug an annual fiscal deficit hole.
The Indian Ministry of Finance did not respond to e-mails seeking comment, while LIC declined to comment.
The sources declined to be identified as the discussions are private.
In its draft prospectus, the insurer cited involvement of the government — which owns 100 percent of LIC and is expected to own about 95 percent after the IPO — as a risk factor and said that minority shareholders could be disadvantaged by government action.
LIC chairman M.R. Kumar told a news conference on Monday that potential investors should not worry about government control after the IPO, as decisions are taken by its board and not by the government.
LIC, which was formed six decades ago when India’s insurance sector was nationalized, straddles the business in the country, with more than 280 million policies and more than 60 percent of the insurance segment.
It is also a big investor, owning as of March last year 23.5 trillion rupees (US$315 billion) of government securities, higher than even the Reserve Bank of India, out of the total central and state government securities worth 115.2 trillion rupees, the prospectus said.
In 2019, it took over IDBI Bank as the government struggled to find a viable buyer for the lender, whose shares had tanked and nearly one-third of its book had gone bad.
LIC said in its draft papers that it might have to infuse more capital into IDBI Bank even though it has been pursuing a buyer for its more than 50 percent stake in the lender.
Some market analysts and fund managers are drawing parallels between LIC and Coal India, which made its market debut in 2010 and, despite being a monopoly, has lost over half of its equity value.
In its most recent earnings call, Coal India chairman and managing director Pramod Agrawal said that one of the reasons for its current low market valuation could be because sometimes government takes steps that are not appreciated by shareholders.
“If LIC makes decisions that are not beneficial for the shareholders then they will raise concerns,” said Ashvin Parekh, an independent financial services consultant. “We have seen that happen earlier when Children Investment Fund exited from state-owned Coal India after listing, as it had concerns over what the majority shareholder was doing, and LIC could also face similar pushbacks from its shareholders.”
SEMICONDUCTOR SERVICES: A company executive said that Taiwanese firms must think about how to participate in global supply chains and lift their competitiveness Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said it expects to launch its first multifunctional service center in Pingtung County in the middle of 2027, in a bid to foster a resilient high-tech facility construction ecosystem. TSMC broached the idea of creating a center two or three years ago when it started building new manufacturing capacity in the US and Japan, the company said. The center, dubbed an “ecosystem park,” would assist local manufacturing facility construction partners to upgrade their capabilities and secure more deals from other global chipmakers such as Intel Corp, Micron Technology Inc and Infineon Technologies AG, TSMC said. It
NO BREAKTHROUGH? More substantial ‘deliverables,’ such as tariff reductions, would likely be saved for a meeting between Trump and Xi later this year, a trade expert said China launched two probes targeting the US semiconductor sector on Saturday ahead of talks between the two nations in Spain this week on trade, national security and the ownership of social media platform TikTok. China’s Ministry of Commerce announced an anti-dumping investigation into certain analog integrated circuits (ICs) imported from the US. The investigation is to target some commodity interface ICs and gate driver ICs, which are commonly made by US companies such as Texas Instruments Inc and ON Semiconductor Corp. The ministry also announced an anti-discrimination probe into US measures against China’s chip sector. US measures such as export curbs and tariffs
The US on Friday penalized two Chinese firms that acquired US chipmaking equipment for China’s top chipmaker, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC, 中芯國際), including them among 32 entities that were added to the US Department of Commerce’s restricted trade list, a US government posting showed. Twenty-three of the 32 are in China. GMC Semiconductor Technology (Wuxi) Co (吉姆西半導體科技) and Jicun Semiconductor Technology (Shanghai) Co (吉存半導體科技) were placed on the list, formally known as the Entity List, for acquiring equipment for SMIC Northern Integrated Circuit Manufacturing (Beijing) Corp (中芯北方積體電路) and Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Beijing) Corp (中芯北京), the US Federal Register posting said. The
India’s ban of online money-based games could drive addicts to unregulated apps and offshore platforms that pose new financial and social risks, fantasy-sports gaming experts say. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government banned real-money online games late last month, citing financial losses and addiction, leading to a shutdown of many apps offering paid fantasy cricket, rummy and poker games. “Many will move to offshore platforms, because of the addictive nature — they will find alternate means to get that dopamine hit,” said Viren Hemrajani, a Mumbai-based fantasy cricket analyst. “It [also] leads to fraud and scams, because everything is now