Japan’s Toshiba Corp walked away from potential private equity buyout offers at a substantial premium, as well as advanced talks for a minority stake from Canada’s Brookfield Asset Management Inc, three people familiar with the matter said.
Toshiba’s decision to not pursue either course — some details of which have not been previously reported — and instead focus on a plan to split itself in three, has widened the gulf between the conglomerate and a number of its hedge fund investors, said the people, all of whom declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the issue.
Some investors take issue with Toshiba’s idea that a three-way split would create greater value than a private equity deal, given that the company never formally solicited buyout bids, the people said.
Photo: Reuters
As such, some investors question the transparency of Toshiba’s ongoing strategic review, they said.
At least one private equity firm told the Toshiba committee tasked with its strategic review that a deal to take it private could be done at ¥6,000 a share or more, two people briefed on the review process said.
Another private equity firm told the committee a deal could be done at about ¥5,000 a share, one of the people briefed on the review and another person said.
A price of ¥6,000 would value Toshiba at about ¥2.6 trillion (US$22.97 billion) and represent a 32 percent premium to its average price over the past 200 days, Refinitiv data showed.
It would also be in line with the ¥6,000 range that some major shareholders, including hedge fund Elliott Management Corp, have estimated as fair.
The Toshiba committee last month said that it had asked four private equity firms at what price a potential deal to go private could happen.
The range of prices it received was “not compelling relative to market expectations,” it said in a statement, without specifying the range or elaborating on market expectations.
Multiple sources have said that the firms included KKR & Co and Bain Capital LP.
“We are communicating with shareholders explaining the separation plan we announced on Nov. 12, as well as listening to their opinions,” Toshiba said in a statement. “We will continue our communications with various stakeholders.”
Paul Brough, the outside director who heads the committee, told investors that splitting Toshiba was “the best alternative,” and the committee would not change its mind even if the price levels were made public, a transcript of a Nov. 15 meeting with investors seen by Reuters showed.
Asked by an investor whether shareholders could “have a voice in the process,” Brough said the committee hoped shareholders would agree that the break-up offered greater value.
Reached via a Toshiba spokesperson, Brough confirmed his comments in the transcript, but declined to comment further.
Some shareholders have also taken issue with Toshiba’s decision not to pursue talks with Canada’s Brookfield, one of the private equity firms, on a potential minority investment, several sources said.
That could have seen Brookfield, which successfully turned around the conglomerate’s bankrupt nuclear power business Westinghouse Electric Co LLC, take a minority stake and help overhaul the business, sources said.
Brookfield did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Toshiba’s review committee has said it held more than 25 meetings with an unnamed “party,” but the suggested transaction was ultimately deemed as “challenging” for shareholders to support.
Toshiba is now conducting interviews with shareholders through investor relations advisory firm Makinson Cowell Ltd to solicit opinions on the break-up, sources said.
A Toshiba source, who declined to be identified, said it appeared that some hedge fund investors would not ever be won over to the break-up plan.
“Certain shareholders would never be satisfied unless we agree to be taken private,” the Toshiba source said.
GEOPOLITICAL ISSUES? The economics ministry said that political factors should not affect supply chains linking global satellite firms and Taiwanese manufacturers Elon Musk’s Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) asked Taiwanese suppliers to transfer manufacturing out of Taiwan, leading to some relocating portions of their supply chain, according to sources employed by and close to the equipment makers and corporate documents. A source at a company that is one of the numerous subcontractors that provide components for SpaceX’s Starlink satellite Internet products said that SpaceX asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan because of geopolitical risks, pushing at least one to move production to Vietnam. A second source who collaborates with Taiwanese satellite component makers in the nation said that suppliers were directly
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
Top Taiwanese officials yesterday moved to ease concern about the potential fallout of Donald Trump’s return to the White House, making a case that the technology restrictions promised by the former US president against China would outweigh the risks to the island. The prospect of Trump’s victory in this week’s election is a worry for Taipei given the Republican nominee in the past cast doubt over the US commitment to defend it from Beijing. But other policies championed by Trump toward China hold some appeal for Taiwan. National Development Council Minister Paul Liu (劉鏡清) described the proposed technology curbs as potentially having
EXPORT CONTROLS: US lawmakers have grown more concerned that the US Department of Commerce might not be aggressively enforcing its chip restrictions The US on Friday said it imposed a US$500,000 penalty on New York-based GlobalFoundries Inc, the world’s third-largest contract chipmaker, for shipping chips without authorization to an affiliate of blacklisted Chinese chipmaker Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC, 中芯). The US Department of Commerce in a statement said GlobalFoundries sent 74 shipments worth US$17.1 million to SJ Semiconductor Corp (盛合晶微半導體), an affiliate of SMIC, without seeking a license. Both SMIC and SJ Semiconductor were added to the department’s trade restriction Entity List in 2020 over SMIC’s alleged ties to the Chinese military-industrial complex. SMIC has denied wrongdoing. Exports to firms on the list