The US Federal Reserve tried so hard to avoid a repeat of the 2013 “taper tantrum” — and was so successful in doing so — that it might just end up backfiring in a big way.
Just a week after the central bank announced that it would begin scaling back its US$120 billion of monthly bond purchases at a pace that would last eight months, US Department of Labor data showed that the US consumer price index (CPI) last month soared 6.2 percent from a year earlier, the fastest annual pace since 1990. It advanced 0.9 percent just from September, the steepest increase in four months.
Meanwhile, the core measure that excludes volatile food and energy prices jumped to 4.6 percent.
Photo: Bloomberg
Fed Chair Jerome Powell acknowledged at his news conference last week that “the level of inflation we have right now is not at all consistent with price stability.”
So, what would he say about this latest reading?
In truth, there is not much he or other Fed officials can really say, except to stick to their line that they expect this level of inflation will ultimately prove to be transitory and fade out by the middle of next year.
Indeed, San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said after the CPI report that it is “premature” to change the calculation about raising interest rates.
It is hardly a coincidence that the central bank’s projected timeline of fading inflation pressure aligns perfectly with its current course of winding down asset purchases.
The problem, as my fellow Bloomberg Opinion columnist Conor Sen noted on Twitter, is that the Fed and the administration of US President Joe Biden have gotten their inflation calls entirely wrong this year.
Price growth has lasted longer than expected and, crucially, they are no longer able to point to obvious reopening quirks as the reason for elevated inflation.
“The really scary thing is that I’m looking for a big outlier,” Michael Ashton, also known as “Inflation Guy,” wrote on Twitter. “And I can’t really find one.”
Bloomberg Economics does not see headline CPI peaking until possibly January.
Typically, this kind of widespread inflation concern, when the labor market is tight by many measures, would call for a policy response.
However, what is the Fed to do? Powell has made it clear that the central bank would not raise interest rates while it is still buying bonds. Traders should not even link tapering and rate increases, he has said, because the latter requires a more stringent test.
The only policy lever that the Fed can pull right now is to accelerate the reduction of its asset purchases.
However, there is good reason to believe that such a move would unnerve people, potentially causing a taper tantrum.
Think about the message that such a shift would send to markets.
First, it would undermine the central bank’s stance that tapering and rate increases are entirely separate — the clear implication of speeding up would be that the Fed needs to quickly get to a place where it could raise interest rates to address price pressures.
Second, it would be an implicit acknowledgment from Powell and his colleagues that they were wrong about inflation being transitory, raising doubts about their ability to contain it. That, in turn, could push expectations for the coming years even higher.
The front end of the US Treasury market is already showing signs of throwing a tantrum. Two-year yields shot higher by about 9 basis points after the CPI report, the biggest one-day move since 2019 when excluding the volatile swings during the worst of the COVID-19 crisis. Five-year yields rose even more, jumping 10 basis points and flattening the curve out to 30 years to just 68 basis points, the lowest since March last year.
While there is still a ways to go before it inverts — the classic sign of an impending slowdown — it is starting to seem as if bond traders are pricing in a Fed that will need to aggressively tighten policy to halt inflation pressure, even if it chokes growth.
For those who believe the Fed is hardly immune to politics, it might seem like a hawkish shift would be highly unlikely ahead of crucial midterm elections a year from now.
However, it is equally possible that surging inflation is even more problematic for Biden and other Democrats.
He said on Wednesday that reversing inflation is a top priority and that it is up to an independent Fed to “take steps necessary to combat it.”
Meanwhile, Democratic US Senator Joe Manchin said on Twitter that “Americans know the inflation tax is real and DC can no longer ignore the economic pain Americans feel every day.”
Fed officials might attempt to satisfy these concerns by using their “dot plot” of expected interest-rate increases, which is to be updated after next month’s US Federal Open Market Committee meeting.
POLICYMAKERS SPLIT
Right now, policymakers are split between raising interest rates or leaving them unchanged next year. After the latest data, the median would almost certainly move up to project one rate increase. Two might be a stretch.
That kind of signaling, without actually doing anything, was policymakers’ playbook from June, when they surprised markets by penciling in two rate hikes in 2023. That might not be enough to quell inflation concerns this time around.
The most likely outcome remains that the Fed will avoid flinching, hold tight to its new policy framework and hope that supply chain bottlenecks will resolve themselves enough by June next year that inflation will come down and it can start to gradually raise interest rates in the second half of next year.
However, Wednesday’s CPI data raises the risk that the temperature in Washington would be too high to stay the course for that long, leaving the Fed with little choice but to speed up tapering at some point early next year.
If that happens, look out for “Taper Tantrum 2.0.”
Brian Chappatta is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering debt markets. He previously covered bonds for Bloomberg News. He is also a CFA charterholder.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Japanese technology giant Softbank Group Corp said Tuesday it has sold its stake in Nvidia Corp, raising US$5.8 billion to pour into other investments. It also reported its profit nearly tripled in the first half of this fiscal year from a year earlier. Tokyo-based Softbank said it sold the stake in Silicon Vally-based Nvidia last month, a move that reflects its shift in focus to OpenAI, owner of the artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot ChatGPT. Softbank reported its profit in the April-to-September period soared to about 2.5 trillion yen (about US$13 billion). Its sales for the six month period rose 7.7 percent year-on-year
CRESTING WAVE: Companies are still buying in, but the shivers in the market could be the first signs that the AI wave has peaked and the collapse is upon the world Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday reported a new monthly record of NT$367.47 billion (US$11.85 billion) in consolidated sales for last month thanks to global demand for artificial intelligence (AI) applications. Last month’s figure represented 16.9 percent annual growth, the slowest pace since February last year. On a monthly basis, sales rose 11 percent. Cumulative sales in the first 10 months of the year grew 33.8 percent year-on-year to NT$3.13 trillion, a record for the same period in the company’s history. However, the slowing growth in monthly sales last month highlights uncertainty over the sustainability of the AI boom even as
AI BOOST: Next year, the cloud and networking product business is expected to remain a key revenue pillar for the company, Hon Hai chairman Young Liu said Manufacturing giant Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) yesterday posted its best third-quarter profit in the company’s history, backed by strong demand for artificial intelligence (AI) servers. Net profit expanded 17 percent annually to NT$57.67 billion (US$1.86 billion) from NT$44.36 billion, the company said. On a quarterly basis, net profit soared 30 percent from NT$44.36 billion, it said. Hon Hai, which is Apple Inc’s primary iPhone assembler and makes servers powered by Nvidia Corp’s AI accelerators, said earnings per share expanded to NT$4.15 from NT$3.55 a year earlier and NT$3.19 in the second quarter. Gross margin improved to 6.35 percent,
FAULTs BELOW: Asia is particularly susceptible to anything unfortunate happening to the AI industry, with tech companies hugely responsible for its market strength The sudden slump in Asia’s technology shares last week has jolted investors, serving as a stark reminder that the world-beating rally in artificial intelligence (AI) and semiconductor stocks might be nearing a short-term crest. The region’s sharpest decline since April — triggered by a tech-led sell-off on Wall Street — has refocused attention on cracks beneath the surface: the rally’s narrow breadth, heavy reliance on retail traders, and growing uncertainty around the timing of US Federal Reserve interest-rate cuts. Last week’s “sell-off is a reminder that Asia’s market structure is just more vulnerable,” Saxo Markets chief investment strategist Charu Chanana said in