China has issued its most comprehensive warning yet against the excessive work culture that pervades the country’s largest corporations, using real and richly detailed court disputes to address a growing backlash against the punishing demands of the private sector.
The Supreme People’s Court and Chinese Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security on Friday published a lengthy essay about labor contraventions and unreasonable overtime, labeled “996” because of the common practice of working 9am to 9pm, six days a week.
It outlined 10 cases — including, but not limited, to the tech industry — in which employees were forced to work extra hours or put in harm’s way.
Photo: AP
In one case, an unidentified tech firm asked employees to sign agreements to give up overtime pay, which the court ruled unlawful.
In another, a media staffer passed out in the office restroom at 5.30am before dying of heart failure.
The court ruled the death work-related and told the company to pay the victim’s family about 400,000 yuan (US$61,807).
“We are seeing a strong trend towards encouraging people to use the court system to go after tech companies. We think civil litigation will increase,” said Kendra Schaefer, head of digital research at consultancy Trivium China.
However, the question remains as to “whether or not this signals regulators are turning their attention to this social problem,” she added.
China’s increasingly profitable tech giants are grappling with public outrage over their grueling schedules, a backlash fueled by a growing chorus of complaints on social media and even deaths. Tech billionaires from Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (阿里巴巴) cofounder Jack Ma (馬雲) to JD.com Inc (京東) founder Richard Liu (劉強東) have long endorsed the practice as necessary for survival in an intensely competitive industry — and the key to accumulating personal wealth.
China’s tech workers face immense pressure to log long hours to meet exacting deadlines, while often lacking clear legal recourse — in contrast with Silicon Valley, where the likes of Google dangle incentives such as lavish cafeterias to motivate workers.
“To be able to work 996 is a huge bliss,” Ma once said. “If you want to join Alibaba, you need to be prepared to work 12 hours a day. Otherwise, why even bother joining?”
Yet the tide is turning. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) administration has launched a campaign to rein in the growing influence of the country’s largest corporations, while calling on the private sector to share the wealth.
Online criticism adds to the challenges for tech companies already weathering heightened scrutiny over their treatment of blue-collar workers and endemic issues, such as forced drinking during official functions.
Meanwhile, Xi’s government is trying to boost domestic consumption and the country’s birthrate; a relentless work culture could stand in the way of his overarching goals.
The “996” regime is especially prevalent in the sprawling tech sector, whose foot soldiers started to protest after the promise of giant payoffs through stock options faded alongside a market wipeout. The issue dates back years: In 2019, a group of Chinese programmers took to GitHub to banish start-ups accused of mistreating employees from using their open-source code.
The controversy culminated earlier this year with the deaths of two workers at hard-charging e-commerce app Pinduoduo Inc (拼多多). One woman collapsed while walking home with colleagues at 1:30am and could not be resuscitated, while another employee committed suicide.
Internet companies including ByteDance Ltd (字節跳動) and Kuaishou Technology (快手) have in the past few months taken initial steps to dial down working hours. The two short-video giants, for their part, have canceled an alternating system where employees take just one day off per week, every two weeks.
“It’s a good sign that the supreme court is finally paying attention. This is about politics as much as it’s about rule of law given the recent crackdowns on companies like Alibaba and Meituan,” said Suji Yan (閻?), founder of tech start-up mask.io who helped initiate the GitHub campaign.
Yan said he tried to help tech workers file labor lawsuits or complaints against their employers throughout 2019, but received a tepid response from courts and regulators.
While Chinese labor laws require extra pay for overtime outside an eight-hour workday, employers have found workarounds and the enforcement of such rules has long been in question.
In one case published by the supreme court on Friday, an unnamed Internet firm told employees that it only counts overtime starting at 9pm — no earlier.
In another, an unidentified pharmaceutical company said that a manager had to sign off on all paid overtime.
The human resources ministry and the courts now aim to develop guidelines to resolve labor disputes, Friday’s notice said.
“The overtime issues at some industries and companies have come to the public’s attention,” the court said. “Legally, workers have the right to corresponding compensation and rest times or holidays. Obeying the national regime for working hours is the obligation of employers. Overtime can easily lead to labor disputes, impact the worker-employer relationship and social stability.”
JITTERS: Nexperia has a 20 percent market share for chips powering simpler features such as window controls, and changing supply chains could take years European carmakers are looking into ways to scratch components made with parts from China, spooked by deepening geopolitical spats playing out through chipmaker Nexperia BV and Beijing’s export controls on rare earths. To protect operations from trade ructions, several automakers are pushing major suppliers to find permanent alternatives to Chinese semiconductors, people familiar with the matter said. The industry is considering broader changes to its supply chain to adapt to shifting geopolitics, Europe’s main suppliers lobby CLEPA head Matthias Zink said. “We had some indications already — questions like: ‘How can you supply me without this dependency on China?’” Zink, who also
At least US$50 million for the freedom of an Emirati sheikh: That is the king’s ransom paid two weeks ago to militants linked to al-Qaeda who are pushing to topple the Malian government and impose Islamic law. Alongside a crippling fuel blockade, the Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims (JNIM) has made kidnapping wealthy foreigners for a ransom a pillar of its strategy of “economic jihad.” Its goal: Oust the junta, which has struggled to contain Mali’s decade-long insurgency since taking power following back-to-back coups in 2020 and 2021, by scaring away investors and paralyzing the west African country’s economy.
BUST FEARS: While a KMT legislator asked if an AI bubble could affect Taiwan, the DGBAS minister said the sector appears on track to continue growing The local property market has cooled down moderately following a series of credit control measures designed to contain speculation, the central bank said yesterday, while remaining tight-lipped about potential rule relaxations. Lawmakers in a meeting of the legislature’s Finance Committee voiced concerns to central bank officials that the credit control measures have adversely affected the government’s tax income and small and medium-sized property developers, with limited positive effects. Housing prices have been climbing since 2016, even when the central bank imposed its first set of control measures in 2020, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Ting-wei (羅廷瑋) said. “Since the second half of
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) received about NT$147 billion (US$4.71 billion) in subsidies from the US, Japanese, German and Chinese governments over the past two years for its global expansion. Financial data compiled by the world’s largest contract chipmaker showed the company secured NT$4.77 billion in subsidies from the governments in the third quarter, bringing the total for the first three quarters of the year to about NT$71.9 billion. Along with the NT$75.16 billion in financial aid TSMC received last year, the chipmaker obtained NT$147 billion in subsidies in almost two years, the data showed. The subsidies received by its subsidiaries —