US President Joe Biden’s plan to wean US drivers off fossil fuels requires massive investment in public charging stations to power the electric-vehicle (EV) revolution. So far, none of the companies that deploy the equipment has figured out how to make a profit.
The dilemma boils down to demand, and there is a certain chicken-and-egg quality to it: Most electric-vehicle drivers charge their cars at home, so many public charging stations get little use, but lots of people still driving gasoline-powered cars would not consider going electric until they see charging stations widely deployed, for fear that they will run out of juice on the road.
Speculators are piling into the industry, convinced that boom times are around the corner, while short sellers and other skeptics have said that some of these companies would go belly-up long before they figure out how to make money.
Photo: AFP
Biden’s plan to spend US$15 billion to help create 500,000 more public stations by 2030 is feeding the optimism, with investors flocking to EV charging companies since his election. The risk is that the early movers would get badly burned, potentially souring capital markets on the industry for years to come.
“It’s definitely going to require years of investment before they get any return,” said Chris Nelder, who has studied the economics of charging for the RMI energy research institute.
Nelder is sure that electric-vehicle charging would eventually be profitable.
However, when that tipping point will arrive is one of the biggest questions hanging over charging companies.
A decade into its existence, the industry is still hunting for a winning business model. Two of the more established names, Blink Charging Co and Beam Global, made less than US$10 million in revenue last year. That did not stop investors from sending Blink shares up more than 500 percent after Biden’s win in November last year, and while it has come well off its peak the company’s market valuation is still north of US$1.6 billion.
Beam jumped more than 300 percent, although it has lost about half its value this year.
The biggest US company, ChargePoint Holdings Inc, just went public via a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC. Others, including EVgo Services and Volta Industries Inc, are poised to follow.
Fueling cars and trucks has always been a low-margin business, with gasoline stations making much of their money from selling snacks, coffee and cigarettes.
The business is even tougher when it comes to EVs. Unless they live in dense cities like New York or San Francisco, drivers do the vast majority of charging at home — their garage is their gas station. They use public chargers infrequently, with most vehicles offering more than enough range to complete daily errands without a topoff. The US Department of Energy has estimated that 80 percent of EV charging happens at home.
Another vexing issue is the nature of using parking spots to double as charging locations. If a customer pulls into a space in her apartment complex at 9pm and hooks up to buy a few dollars’ worth of electricity, more often than not, she would leave her car there until going to work the next day. No one else can use that charger for the next 10 hours, regardless of when her car is done charging.
Then there is the relatively small number of vehicles involved. Americans bought 259,000 new electric vehicles last year, a record according to BloombergNEF, but it is still just 2 percent of total car and truck sales.
Of those new EVs, 79 percent were made by Tesla Inc, which has its own branded network of “superchargers” that cannot be used by any other electric vehicle.
General Motors Co this week said that it signed agreements with seven charging providers to make sure its EV drivers would have places to plug in.
Tesla drivers are “close-looped into the Tesla network,” BloombergNEF analyst Ryan Fisher said. “Where is the demand to plug into these other networks? It doesn’t exist.”
The Biden administration hopes it can boost some of that demand with the proposed spending, part of its infrastructure plan now before the US Congress.
Some of the money would go toward grants and incentive programs to install chargers, according to a fact sheet from the White House, and some would go toward research into lowering the cost of the chargers themselves.
The charging companies are positioning themselves for profitability in different ways.
ChargePoint sells stations and offers various degrees of operational support, but does not get paid from the charging itself. A typical client might be a Silicon Valley company that offers its employees free charging at work as a perk. If a particular station gets little use, ChargePoint still gets paid.
“I wouldn’t want a driver as a customer, because I think I’d starve to death,” ChargePoint chief executive officer Pasquale Romano said in an interview. “There’s not a lot of money in electricity.”
Other companies, such as EVgo, own the chargers they deploy and make money each time they are used.
Meanwhile, Blink takes both approaches at once. The company prefers to own and operate as many of its stations as possible, but if a property owner wants to buy the chargers from Blink outright, that is fine, too.
The biggest priority is locking up good sites in high-demand areas, Blink chief executive officer Michael Farkas has said.
“Right now, this is a land grab,” Farkas said in an interview. “For us this is about getting as many locations as we can, and we’ll deal with profitability later.”
Volta Industries, which plans to go public in a SPAC deal this year, adds advertising to the mix. Its chargers come with 55-inch digital screens. A grocery store can place chargers in its parking lot and bombard customers with ads for specific products inside.
Beam Global offers a self-contained unit with a canopy of solar cells powering a battery and a charger. It does not require digging up the parking lot to install a power line.
“You can tell the world you’re driving on sunshine for free,” chief executive officer Desmond Wheatley said in an interview.
There is good reason for Beam to focus on easy installation and self-generated power. The time and cost to install a grid-connected charging station can be significant, often involving construction permits and hooking up to the local utility.
The equipment itself can range from less than US$2,000 for a slower, basic charger to more than US$100,000 for the most powerful models, according to BloombergNEF.
Increased production should bring down the hardware costs, but for now, they are another reason some of the companies struggle to turn a profit.
“It’s still early days,” said Colin Rusch, a senior analyst who covers the industry for Oppenheimer & Co. “Like with any early stage industry, you’ve got to give it some time, until they get to scale.”
DAMAGE REPORT: Global central banks are assessing war-driven inflation risks as the law of unintended consequences careens around the world, spiking oil prices Central banks from Washington to London and from Jakarta to Taipei are about to make their first assessments of economic damage after more than two weeks of conflict between the US and Iran. Decisions this week encompassing every member of the G7 and eight of the world’s 10 most-traded currency jurisdictions are likely to confirm to investors that the specter of a new inflation shock is already worrying enough to prompt heightened caution. The US Federal Reserve is widely expected to do exactly what everyone anticipated weeks ahead of its March 17-18 policy gathering: hold rates steady. The narrative surrounding that
Apple Inc increased iPhone production in India by about 53 percent last year and now makes a quarter of its marquee devices there, reflecting the US company’s efforts to avoid tariffs on China. The company assembled about 55 million iPhones in India last year, up from 36 million a year earlier, people familiar with the matter said, asking not to be named because the numbers aren’t public. Apple makes about 220 million to 230 million iPhones a year globally, with India’s share of the total increasing rapidly. Apple has accelerated its expansion in the world’s most populous country in recent years, bolstered
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) share of the global foundry market rose to almost 70 percent last year amid booming demand for artificial intelligence (AI), market information advisory firm TrendForce Corp (集邦科技) said on Thursday. The contract chipmaker posted US$122.54 billion in revenue, up 36.1 percent from a year earlier, accounting for 69.9 percent of the global market, TrendForce said. Its share was up from 64.4 percent in 2024, it said. TSMC’s closest rival, Samsung Electronics, was a distant second, posting US$12.63 billion in sales, down 3.9 percent from a year earlier, for a 7.2 percent share of the global market. In the
HEADWINDS: The company said it expects its computer business, as well as consumer electronics and communications segments to see revenue declines due to seasonality Pegatron Corp (和碩) yesterday said it aims to grow its artificial intelligence (AI) server revenue more than 10-fold this year from last year, driven by orders from neocloud solutions clients and large cloud service providers. The electronics manufacturing service provider said AI server revenue growth would be driven primarily by the Nvidia Corp GB300 server platform. Server shipments are expected to increase each quarter this year, with the second half likely to outperform the first half, it said. The AI server market is expected to broaden this year as more inference applications emerge, which would drive demand for system-on-chip, application-specific integrated circuits
RSS