US President Joe Biden’s plan to wean US drivers off fossil fuels requires massive investment in public charging stations to power the electric-vehicle (EV) revolution. So far, none of the companies that deploy the equipment has figured out how to make a profit.
The dilemma boils down to demand, and there is a certain chicken-and-egg quality to it: Most electric-vehicle drivers charge their cars at home, so many public charging stations get little use, but lots of people still driving gasoline-powered cars would not consider going electric until they see charging stations widely deployed, for fear that they will run out of juice on the road.
Speculators are piling into the industry, convinced that boom times are around the corner, while short sellers and other skeptics have said that some of these companies would go belly-up long before they figure out how to make money.
Photo: AFP
Biden’s plan to spend US$15 billion to help create 500,000 more public stations by 2030 is feeding the optimism, with investors flocking to EV charging companies since his election. The risk is that the early movers would get badly burned, potentially souring capital markets on the industry for years to come.
“It’s definitely going to require years of investment before they get any return,” said Chris Nelder, who has studied the economics of charging for the RMI energy research institute.
Nelder is sure that electric-vehicle charging would eventually be profitable.
However, when that tipping point will arrive is one of the biggest questions hanging over charging companies.
A decade into its existence, the industry is still hunting for a winning business model. Two of the more established names, Blink Charging Co and Beam Global, made less than US$10 million in revenue last year. That did not stop investors from sending Blink shares up more than 500 percent after Biden’s win in November last year, and while it has come well off its peak the company’s market valuation is still north of US$1.6 billion.
Beam jumped more than 300 percent, although it has lost about half its value this year.
The biggest US company, ChargePoint Holdings Inc, just went public via a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC. Others, including EVgo Services and Volta Industries Inc, are poised to follow.
Fueling cars and trucks has always been a low-margin business, with gasoline stations making much of their money from selling snacks, coffee and cigarettes.
The business is even tougher when it comes to EVs. Unless they live in dense cities like New York or San Francisco, drivers do the vast majority of charging at home — their garage is their gas station. They use public chargers infrequently, with most vehicles offering more than enough range to complete daily errands without a topoff. The US Department of Energy has estimated that 80 percent of EV charging happens at home.
Another vexing issue is the nature of using parking spots to double as charging locations. If a customer pulls into a space in her apartment complex at 9pm and hooks up to buy a few dollars’ worth of electricity, more often than not, she would leave her car there until going to work the next day. No one else can use that charger for the next 10 hours, regardless of when her car is done charging.
Then there is the relatively small number of vehicles involved. Americans bought 259,000 new electric vehicles last year, a record according to BloombergNEF, but it is still just 2 percent of total car and truck sales.
Of those new EVs, 79 percent were made by Tesla Inc, which has its own branded network of “superchargers” that cannot be used by any other electric vehicle.
General Motors Co this week said that it signed agreements with seven charging providers to make sure its EV drivers would have places to plug in.
Tesla drivers are “close-looped into the Tesla network,” BloombergNEF analyst Ryan Fisher said. “Where is the demand to plug into these other networks? It doesn’t exist.”
The Biden administration hopes it can boost some of that demand with the proposed spending, part of its infrastructure plan now before the US Congress.
Some of the money would go toward grants and incentive programs to install chargers, according to a fact sheet from the White House, and some would go toward research into lowering the cost of the chargers themselves.
The charging companies are positioning themselves for profitability in different ways.
ChargePoint sells stations and offers various degrees of operational support, but does not get paid from the charging itself. A typical client might be a Silicon Valley company that offers its employees free charging at work as a perk. If a particular station gets little use, ChargePoint still gets paid.
“I wouldn’t want a driver as a customer, because I think I’d starve to death,” ChargePoint chief executive officer Pasquale Romano said in an interview. “There’s not a lot of money in electricity.”
Other companies, such as EVgo, own the chargers they deploy and make money each time they are used.
Meanwhile, Blink takes both approaches at once. The company prefers to own and operate as many of its stations as possible, but if a property owner wants to buy the chargers from Blink outright, that is fine, too.
The biggest priority is locking up good sites in high-demand areas, Blink chief executive officer Michael Farkas has said.
“Right now, this is a land grab,” Farkas said in an interview. “For us this is about getting as many locations as we can, and we’ll deal with profitability later.”
Volta Industries, which plans to go public in a SPAC deal this year, adds advertising to the mix. Its chargers come with 55-inch digital screens. A grocery store can place chargers in its parking lot and bombard customers with ads for specific products inside.
Beam Global offers a self-contained unit with a canopy of solar cells powering a battery and a charger. It does not require digging up the parking lot to install a power line.
“You can tell the world you’re driving on sunshine for free,” chief executive officer Desmond Wheatley said in an interview.
There is good reason for Beam to focus on easy installation and self-generated power. The time and cost to install a grid-connected charging station can be significant, often involving construction permits and hooking up to the local utility.
The equipment itself can range from less than US$2,000 for a slower, basic charger to more than US$100,000 for the most powerful models, according to BloombergNEF.
Increased production should bring down the hardware costs, but for now, they are another reason some of the companies struggle to turn a profit.
“It’s still early days,” said Colin Rusch, a senior analyst who covers the industry for Oppenheimer & Co. “Like with any early stage industry, you’ve got to give it some time, until they get to scale.”
SEMICONDUCTORS: The German laser and plasma generator company will expand its local services as its specialized offerings support Taiwan’s semiconductor industries Trumpf SE + Co KG, a global leader in supplying laser technology and plasma generators used in chip production, is expanding its investments in Taiwan in an effort to deeply integrate into the global semiconductor supply chain in the pursuit of growth. The company, headquartered in Ditzingen, Germany, has invested significantly in a newly inaugurated regional technical center for plasma generators in Taoyuan, its latest expansion in Taiwan after being engaged in various industries for more than 25 years. The center, the first of its kind Trumpf built outside Germany, aims to serve customers from Taiwan, Japan, Southeast Asia and South Korea,
Gasoline and diesel prices at domestic fuel stations are to fall NT$0.2 per liter this week, down for a second consecutive week, CPC Corp, Taiwan (台灣中油) and Formosa Petrochemical Corp (台塑石化) announced yesterday. Effective today, gasoline prices at CPC and Formosa stations are to drop to NT$26.4, NT$27.9 and NT$29.9 per liter for 92, 95 and 98-octane unleaded gasoline respectively, the companies said in separate statements. The price of premium diesel is to fall to NT$24.8 per liter at CPC stations and NT$24.6 at Formosa pumps, they said. The price adjustments came even as international crude oil prices rose last week, as traders
SIZE MATTERS: TSMC started phasing out 8-inch wafer production last year, while Samsung is more aggressively retiring 8-inch capacity, TrendForce said Chipmakers are expected to raise prices of 8-inch wafers by up to 20 percent this year on concern over supply constraints as major contract chipmakers Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) and Samsung Electronics Co gradually retire less advanced wafer capacity, TrendForce Corp (集邦科技) said yesterday. It is the first significant across-the-board price hike since a global semiconductor correction in 2023, the Taipei-based market researcher said in a report. Global 8-inch wafer capacity slid 0.3 percent year-on-year last year, although 8-inch wafer prices still hovered at relatively stable levels throughout the year, TrendForce said. The downward trend is expected to continue this year,
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), which supplies advanced chips to Nvidia Corp and Apple Inc, yesterday reported NT$1.046 trillion (US$33.1 billion) in revenue for last quarter, driven by constantly strong demand for artificial intelligence (AI) chips, falling in the upper end of its forecast. Based on TSMC’s financial guidance, revenue would expand about 22 percent sequentially to the range from US$32.2 billion to US$33.4 billion during the final quarter of 2024, it told investors in October last year. Last year in total, revenue jumped 31.61 percent to NT$3.81 trillion, compared with NT$2.89 trillion generated in the year before, according to
RSS