Taipei Times (TT): Offshore wind power development is a new field to Taiwanese. How does HSBC Taiwan Ltd (匯豐台灣商銀) assess the risks of lending to the offshore wind developers working on their projects?
Adam Chen (陳志堅): First of all, we focus on the developers themselves. We check if they are HSBC’s existing clients, if they have experience in offshore wind power and if they can deliver in Taiwan. If the foreign companies are already clients of HSBC, we would have access to their credit profile. So, in principle, we prioritize the developers that HSBC is familiar with, as we would feel safer.
It is not that we would not finance the local developers that have never established offshore wind farms, but for potential clients, we need more communication to evaluate their commitment to the projects, their financial strength and their capability to establish wind farms.
Photo: Kao Shih-ching, Taipei Times
Second, we review the financing conditions proposed by developers and see if they are reasonable. Developers tend to have different ideas about loan structures due to their various experiences in other countries. Some might not fit in the local situation, and some might need more negotiation.
We also need to review other participants in the project, such as the contractors, suppliers and vessel providers. We look at the whole picture, and if we do not feel safe about some parts, we might feel more hesitant about financing the projects.
TT: Developers used to prefer selling power to the government to secure a better price, but Orsted Taiwan Ltd (沃旭能源) chose to sell power to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (台積電) from 2025. If more private companies enter the market as buyers, how would that reshape the financing risks?
Chen: New buyers of offshore wind power would be very welcome, as they would help the green power market develop in a healthier way. The market would want to see a balance between government and private-sector buyers.
There are likely new risks we would face. We need to check the new buyers’ credit profiles.
While the government signs a 20-year power purchase agreement with the developers to buy their energy at fixed prices, private companies might only want to buy the power for 10 or 15 years, but these are just a few among many risk factors considered, and they could be managed.
For example, we can help or suggest that the developers find other new clients to continue buying wind power for another 10 years.
We need to evaluate the risks with new methods if the buyers are private companies instead of the government, but overall, the risks would be reduced with diverse buyers, compared with Taiwan Power Co (台電) being the sole buyer.
TT: Why did most lending to offshore wind developers in Taiwan follow the new project financing model, which was relatively unknown in the nation?
Chen: That is because offshore wind projects are suitable for the model, as they are expected to generate revenue for 20 years once they begin operations, which matches project finance relying primarily on the project’s cash flow for repayment.
Project financing is often used in funding long-term infrastructure or industrial projects, but project financing with a 20-year term is not often seen, as most loan terms range from five to 10 years.
While one offshore wind developer sought corporate loans, with its parent company willing to guarantee the lending, not all offshore wind developers are willing to follow the same path. Most of them prefer project financing as they do not need to put up many assets as collateral, so they can fund major projects off-balance-sheet.
TT: How do you organize the project financing structure to reduce risks?
Chen: It is crucial for us to offload the risks. We negotiate with all involved parties to distribute the risks. Banks usually cover risks of foreign exchange or volatility in the financial markets, while other risks are covered by developers, contractors, suppliers and buyers.
We have penalty provisions in the deal to prevent participants from delaying. For example, if the contractor cannot finish its work on time or has any problems with the construction, it must pay penalties or liquidated damage to the project company, which would help the project continue and arrive at the finish line.
Generally, it is preferred to have fewer shareholding developers in a project at the initial development phase to be able to structure and negotiate more effectively. Meanwhile, they would be more committed to concluding the project. The shareholding developers would be able to sell their stakes when the construction of the wind farms is complete.
As there are a lot of issues to negotiate among all parties and banks, settlement on project financing for offshore wind project takes from 13 to 18 months on average.
TT: What are HSBC Taiwan’s advantages compared with local banks? And what is its outlook for the business?
Chen: HSBC Taiwan is in a great position to finance offshore wind projects, as the local government has a high commitment to developing green energy, [we have] the bankers with skills to develop infrastructure and energy project financing solutions and we can leverage the HSBC global network and access project developers around the globe.
That also explains why we are the sole issuer of guarantee letters to support the offshore wind power developers, after we issued a legal document for NT$3.6 billion for the construction of two wind farms developed by Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners in northwest Taiwan, because we know the developers’ profiles better.
We play the role of bridging the local government’s green energy development objectives and the interests of overseas developers. Each project financing [deal] has been carefully evaluated and tailored to meet the developmental requirements.
I personally have an upbeat outlook for financing offshore wind projects, as once the wind farms become operational, investors will feel more confident and commit more. The government is formulating the zonal development policy for offshore wind for the next 10-year stage from 2026 to 2035, so the business opportunities would be big.
We expect to continue collaborating with our local peers and to share our knowledge and experience with them, so banks can work together to support the business.
RESTRUCTURING: Taichung and Taoyuan profited most from local firms moving back high-end manufacturing amid the US-China decoupling of trade ties, the ministry said The government’s “Invest in Taiwan” initiative might this year see NT$627.1 billion (US$21.7 billion) of investment pledges realized, with several firms raising stakes and two dropouts due to customer losses, Minister of Economic Affairs (MOEA) Wang Mei-hua (王美花) said yesterday. Wang made the statement at the monthly meeting of the Third Wednesday Club, a local trade group featuring the top 100 firms of each business sector. Since early last year, the government has launched three programs intended to help local companies grapple with US-China trade rows and the COVID-19 pandemic, mainly through moving production lines back to Taiwan. Thus far, the ministry
JOBS AT RISK? Most Cathay Dragon routes are to be operated by Cathay Pacific or a subsidiary, but it was unclear how Taiwanese workers would be affected Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd (國泰航空) yesterday said it is planning new flight services for Taiwan as it announced a corporate restructuring that included the shutdown of its regional subsidiary, Cathay Dragon (國泰港龍), and could lead to job cuts in Taiwan. Cathay Pacific said the shutdown means that the one round-trip service between Taichung and Hong Kong per day and seven round-trip services between Kaohsiung and Hong Kong operated by Cathay Dragon prior to the COVID-19 pandemic would be terminated. “The parent company is planning a new schedule between Taiwan and Hong Kong,” Cathay Pacific assistant manager for corporate communications Moses Hou (侯恩錫)
OVERHEATED MARKET?: The gauge would be designed to provide more reliable information than private-sector data, and help improve policymaking, the council said The National Development Council (NDC) is considering creating a business climate index on Taiwan’s property market, allowing policymakers to better monitor market movements and intervene if necessary, NDC Minister Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) said yesterday. Kung made the remarks at a meeting of the legislature’s Economic Committee where lawmakers from across party lines voiced concerns about housing price hikes driven by capital repatriation. Kung said that the council is assessing the possibility of creating an index designed to provide more accountable and transparent information than data provided by private-sector market analysts, and could help improve policymaking. The council would compile a report on
STOCK MARKETS TAIEX closes slightly higher The TAIEX closed slightly higher yesterday as market sentiment remained cautious over the Nov. 3 US presidential election. Contract chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) was again the anchor stabilizing the broader market, preventing the main board from falling into negative territory at the end of the session, dealers said. The TAIEX closed up 14.88 points, or 0.12 percent, at 12,877.25, on turnover of NT$167.982 billion (US$5.81 billion). TSMC, the most heavily weighted stock on the local market, rose 0.44 percent after fluctuating between NT$451 and NT$456. The semiconductor subindex and the bellwether electronics sector