Alphabet Inc’s Google upended plans by European media companies to block it from harvesting data about their readers and slash some of its dominance in online advertising, seven people involved in the talks said last month.
Publishers had expected to use data privacy measures going into effect on Aug. 15 to bar Google from storing insights about readers, sapping the data advantage that has enabled it to dominate a market filled with advertisers hungry for information to target potential customers.
However, Google said it would cut off publishers from a lucrative flow of ads if they follow through with curbing its data collection.
Photo: AFP
Negotiations continue, but Google holds greater leverage, because it dominates in both advertising tools and access to advertisers within the US$100 billion annual global banner ads market.
“You have to basically implement what [Google] expect from you or you’re out of the market — you can’t do without them,” said Thomas Adhumeau, general counsel at S4M, which competes with Google in software for advertisers.
The publishers’ strategy and the discussions have not been previously reported.
Google has repeatedly outmaneuvered Web site owners and its competitors over the past decade to ensure its dominance. In several cases, publishers circumvented Google to attract higher prices for ads, only to see Google reassert itself as an indispensable cog.
Rivals and publishers contend some of Google’s actions were unlawfully anti-competitive, and authorities in the US, the UK, the EU and Australia are considering pursuing penalties this year, with some even mulling breaking up Google.
Media giant News Corp this year publicly complained to Australian regulators about Google gaining an advantage over publishers by harvesting audience data.
Other companies said they would complain if Google does cut off some ads next month.
Google describes the online ads industry as competitive and says its policies aim to square EU privacy law with how its ad tools work.
The EU’s two-year-old General Data Protection Regulation requires companies to get users’ permission or have a legitimate reason before handling their data.
It prompted the Interactive Advertising Bureau of Europe, a consortium involving Google along with its clients and partners, to develop a technical protocol known as the transparency and consent framework (TCF) for ensuring all of them had the appropriate approvals from consumers.
Bureau Chief Executive Townsend Feehan said that pushed by major publishers, the consortium last year agreed to ask users for two separate permissions previously tied together: one to be shown personalized ads, the other to have their personal data collected in a profile.
Some Web sites and apps planned to omit the second permission. That would starve Google’s profile-building, while still allowing those properties to serve up personalized ads from Google’s clients.
However, Google now says consumers must grant both permissions to get personalized ads.
“This is contrary to what was agreed” by the consortium, said Angela Mills Wade, executive director of the European Publishers’ Council.
Chetna Bindra, a senior product manager at Google, said its policy around TCF keeps the status quo.
It “doesn’t change any of our policies for publishers, including our consent policy, which helps ensure users have transparency into and control over how their data is being collected and used to serve personalized ads,” Bindra said.
Some Google rivals, such as advertiser software maker MediaMath, said they might split the data permissions, giving publishers another way to undercut Google.
However, they still would have to forgo its bountiful ad supply.
Media groups Axel Springer SE of Germany and Schibsted ASA of Norway are among those frustrated with Google’s stance.
“We are concerned when big players seek to dictate the ways we should process data,” Schibsted chief privacy officer Ingvild Ness said. “It’s concerning and problematic if we end up in a situation where certain companies become gatekeepers.”
Google uses software, which millions of partner Web sites rely on to display ads, to track readers’ location, characteristics and the pages and content they consume. These profiles allow marketers to target ads to particular users as they browse online.
Publishers, no matter how vast their own audiences, have struggled to compete with the breadth of Google’s profiles.
“When Google harvests that data and enriches their profiles, Google could be seen as bleeding publishers dry one drop at a time,” said Adrien Thil, chief privacy officer at Smart, which competes with Google in publisher software.
Media companies must share revenue with Google to access the unparalleled number of advertiser clients it attracts with its data.
Globally, publishers’ share of Google ad revenue has fallen in half to 16 percent over the past decade, according to a paper released last month by Dina Srinivasan, an antitrust consultant to News Corp.
‘SWASTICAR’: Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s close association with Donald Trump has prompted opponents to brand him a ‘Nazi’ and resulted in a dramatic drop in sales Demonstrators descended on Tesla Inc dealerships across the US, and in Europe and Canada on Saturday to protest company chief Elon Musk, who has amassed extraordinary power as a top adviser to US President Donald Trump. Waving signs with messages such as “Musk is stealing our money” and “Reclaim our country,” the protests largely took place peacefully following fiery episodes of vandalism on Tesla vehicles, dealerships and other facilities in recent weeks that US officials have denounced as terrorism. Hundreds rallied on Saturday outside the Tesla dealership in Manhattan. Some blasted Musk, the world’s richest man, while others demanded the shuttering of his
ADVERSARIES: The new list includes 11 entities in China and one in Taiwan, which is a local branch of Chinese cloud computing firm Inspur Group The US added dozens of entities to a trade blacklist on Tuesday, the US Department of Commerce said, in part to disrupt Beijing’s artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced computing capabilities. The action affects 80 entities from countries including China, the United Arab Emirates and Iran, with the commerce department citing their “activities contrary to US national security and foreign policy.” Those added to the “entity list” are restricted from obtaining US items and technologies without government authorization. “We will not allow adversaries to exploit American technology to bolster their own militaries and threaten American lives,” US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said. The entities
Minister of Finance Chuang Tsui-yun (莊翠雲) yesterday told lawmakers that she “would not speculate,” but a “response plan” has been prepared in case Taiwan is targeted by US President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, which are to be announced on Wednesday next week. The Trump administration, including US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, has said that much of the proposed reciprocal tariffs would focus on the 15 countries that have the highest trade surpluses with the US. Bessent has referred to those countries as the “dirty 15,” but has not named them. Last year, Taiwan’s US$73.9 billion trade surplus with the US
Prices of gasoline and diesel products at domestic gas stations are to fall NT$0.2 and NT$0.1 per liter respectively this week, even though international crude oil prices rose last week, CPC Corp, Taiwan (台灣中油) and Formosa Petrochemical Corp (台塑石化) said yesterday. International crude oil prices continued rising last week, as the US Energy Information Administration reported a larger-than-expected drop in US commercial crude oil inventories, CPC said in a statement. Based on the company’s floating oil price formula, the cost of crude oil rose 2.38 percent last week from a week earlier, it said. News that US President Donald Trump plans a “secondary
RSS