A group of Amazon.com Inc employees who pushed the company to combat climate change that say Amazon has threatened to fire some of them if they continue to speak out about their employer’s internal affairs.
Two were threatened with termination, a spokesperson for Amazon Employees for Climate Justice said, and a total of four were told in meetings that they were in violation of the company’s policies on workers speaking to the press and on social media.
Maren Costa, a user experience designer, was threatened with termination after speaking to the Washington Post, according to a statement from the group.
“This is not the time to shoot the messengers,” Costa said in the release. “This is not the time to silence those who are speaking out.”
The Washington Post is owned by Amazon chief executive officer Jeff Bezos.
Jaci Anderson, an Amazon spokesperson, said in an e-mailed statement that the company’s external communications policy is not new.
Employees are “encouraged to work within their teams,” and may suggest “improvements to how we operate through those internal channels,” Anderson said.
The tech industry has been roiled by employee activism in the past couple of years. After Google workers raised concerns about bidding on military contracts, the Alphabet Inc search giant backed out of a US Department of Defense drone program and did not bid on a contract to build cloud services for the Pentagon.
Employees at Microsoft Corp and Salesforce.com Inc have pressed executives about their companies’ dealings with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
In late 2018, the Amazon Employees for Climate Justice began discussing ways to persuade its employer to curb its contributions to climate change. The e-commerce company to that point had committed to powering some of its infrastructure with renewable energy sources, but stopped short of the bigger commitments and transparency promised by some other large technology and logistics companies.
The group put forward a shareholder resolution, backed by thousands of employees in an open letter, that called on Amazon to write a report detailing preparations for climate-related disruptions and plans to reduce use of the fossil fuels. Shareholders rejected the proposal at Amazon’s annual meeting in May.
Amazon made much of the employees’ climate proposal a few months later, when Bezos in September last year announced aims to power Amazon’s operations entirely with renewable energy by 2030 and be carbon neutral by 2040. The announcement came a day before hundreds of employees held a rally at its Seattle headquarters to start a march with other climate activists in the city and around the world.
The employees say Amazon changed its policy on workers speaking to the media after the September walkout was announced.
The updated policy requires employees to seek approval before speaking about Amazon in any public forum in which they are identified as an Amazon employee, the employee group said.
Anderson said work on that updated policy began in the spring of last year and was designed to make it easier to manage approvals for employee engagements.
“I encourage you to review the policy again and in the future any time you may consider speaking about Amazon’s business in a public forum,” Eric Sjoding, an employee in Amazon’s human resources group, wrote to Costa in an e-mail on Nov. 22 last year.
Three experts in the high technology industry have said that US President Donald Trump’s pledge to impose higher tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors is part of an effort to force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) to the negotiating table. In a speech to Republicans on Jan. 27, Trump said he intends to impose tariffs on Taiwan to bring chip production to the US. “The incentive is going to be they’re not going to want to pay a 25, 50 or even a 100 percent tax,” he said. Darson Chiu (邱達生), an economics professor at Taichung-based Tunghai University and director-general of
‘LEGACY CHIPS’: Chinese companies have dramatically increased mature chip production capacity, but the West’s drive for secure supply chains offers a lifeline for Taiwan When Powerchip Technology Corp (力晶科技) entered a deal with the eastern Chinese city of Hefei in 2015 to set up a new chip foundry, it hoped the move would help provide better access to the promising Chinese market. However, nine years later, that Chinese foundry, Nexchip Semiconductor Corp (合晶集成), has become one of its biggest rivals in the legacy chip space, leveraging steep discounts after Beijing’s localization call forced Powerchip to give up the once-lucrative business making integrated circuits for Chinese flat panels. Nexchip is among Chinese foundries quickly winning market share in the crucial US$56.3 billion industry of so-called legacy
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in