It seems like every asset bubble has a famous anecdote of someone claiming, right at the top, that a crash is impossible.
In the stock-market bubble leading up to the Great Depression, it was economist Irving Fisher, who declared in the New York Times that stocks “have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau” a few days before a collapse that would see stocks lose 89 percent of their value. In 2007 and 2008, many optimistic pronouncements by US National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow turned out to be disastrously wrong.
In the great bitcoin bubble of late last year, the honor goes to John McAfee, founder of computer security company McAfee LLC and passionate cryptocurrency evangelist.
On Dec. 7 last year, he tweeted: “Bitcoin now at $16,600.00. Those of you in the old school who believe this is a bubble simply have not understood the new mathematics of the Blockchain, or you did not cared enough to try. Bubbles are mathematically impossible in this new paradigm. So are corrections and all else.”
A few days later bitcoin’s price briefly peaked at US$19,511, before it began an epic plunge that would see the original cryptocurrency lose approximately 82 percent of that value as of the writing of this column.
Does that mean bitcoin is dead? Not necessarily — the cryptocurrency has recovered from several previous bubbles and crashes, including one in 2011 that was just about as devastating.
Also, it is worth noting that even if they have held on to all of their bitcoin, early investors have still come out ahead in the latest bubble — the current price, though down spectacularly from the peak, is still more than triple what it was when last year began. If they sold some of their holdings at or near the peak, as many are reported to have done, they are in even better financial shape.
However, for ordinary investors, who do not tend to get in early on potentially revolutionary new technologies or to have the savvy or luck to time the market, the bitcoin bubble should serve as a learning experience.
The most important lesson is: Financial bubbles are real and they will make your life’s savings vanish if you are not careful.
Formally, an asset bubble is just a rapid rise and abrupt crash in prices. Defenders of the efficient-market theory argue that these price movements are based on changes in investors’ beliefs about an asset’s true value.
However, it is hard to identify a reason why any rational investor would have so abruptly revised their assessment of the long-term earnings power of companies in 1929, or the long-term viability of dot-com start-ups in 2000, or the long-term value of housing in 2007.
Similarly, there was no obvious reason why it made sense for the world to believe that bitcoin was the currency of the future on Dec. 17 last year, but to think this was less than one-fifth as likely today.
Bitcoin was not eclipsed by a competitor — the main alternative cryptocurrencies had even bigger price declines. Nor have regulators cracked down on bitcoin — the regulatory structure has generally been quite accommodating to the technology. Nor have critical technological flaws emerged — yes, the bitcoin network has become congested, but this problem was anticipated well before the crash.
Instead, it seems overwhelmingly likely that bitcoin’s spectacular rise and fall was due not to rational optimism followed by sensible pessimism, but to some kind of aggregate market irrationality — a combination of herd behavior, cynical speculation and the entry into the market of a large number of new, poorly informed investors.
It was this latter type of investor who got burned. There is no shortage of horror stories about people who poured their modest life’s savings into what looked like a sure bet, only to see it vanish — some of it into the pockets of bitcoin’s early investor aristocracy, some of it into thin air.
How can regular, average investors avoid this fate? Bubbles are extremely hard to spot — if it was easy, they would not exist in the first place.
However, there are two important strategies investors can use to limit their risk.
First, realize that there is no such thing as a sure bet. The optimistic bitcoin story, repeated often by the cryptocurrency’s army of gung-ho online evangelists, was that bitcoin was going to replace standard fiat money as the main global currency.
However, that story always had major holes. Assets with high volatility and high long-term expected returns make bad currency, since short-term volatility renders them less useful for making payments — you will notice that nobody buys pizzas with ingots of gold or shares of Apple Inc stock.
Second, cryptocurrency is an impressive new technology, but there are major technological limitations related to security and usability that have yet to be overcome.
Since nothing is a sure bet, regular investors need to stay diversified. It is okay to put a bit of your savings into something like bitcoin, just in case the price goes way up, but just do not make it a very large piece.
The potential pain of a crash should far outweigh the fear of missing out. I myself lost money in the bitcoin crash (I still have my bitcoins and have not sold). I just did not lose very much, because I only invested a very small portion of my assets.
In the end, the bitcoin bubble might have been a net good for society. The total amount of wealth involved — a few hundred billion US dollars, spread out around the globe — was small compared with the 2000s housing bubble or the 1990s dot-com bubble, meaning the pain would be limited.
The experience of such a classic, perfect financial bubble might be sufficient to teach the millennial generation what their forebears learned much more painfully: If something looks too good to be true, it usually is.
Noah Smith is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He was an assistant professor of finance at Stony Brook University and he blogs at Noahpinion.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of
the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
SEEKING CLARITY: Washington should not adopt measures that create uncertainties for ‘existing semiconductor investments,’ TSMC said referring to its US$165 billion in the US Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) told the US that any future tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors could reduce demand for chips and derail its pledge to increase its investment in Arizona. “New import restrictions could jeopardize current US leadership in the competitive technology industry and create uncertainties for many committed semiconductor capital projects in the US, including TSMC Arizona’s significant investment plan in Phoenix,” the chipmaker wrote in a letter to the US Department of Commerce. TSMC issued the warning in response to a solicitation for comments by the department on a possible tariff on semiconductor imports by US President Donald Trump’s
The government has launched a three-pronged strategy to attract local and international talent, aiming to position Taiwan as a new global hub following Nvidia Corp’s announcement that it has chosen Taipei as the site of its Taiwan headquarters. Nvidia cofounder and CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) on Monday last week announced during his keynote speech at the Computex trade show in Taipei that the Nvidia Constellation, the company’s planned Taiwan headquarters, would be located in the Beitou-Shilin Technology Park (北投士林科技園區) in Taipei. Huang’s decision to establish a base in Taiwan is “primarily due to Taiwan’s talent pool and its strength in the semiconductor
An earnings report from semiconductor giant and artificial intelligence (AI) bellwether Nvidia Corp takes center stage for Wall Street this week, as stocks hit a speed bump of worries over US federal deficits driving up Treasury yields. US equities pulled back last week after a torrid rally, as investors turned their attention to tax and spending legislation poised to swell the US government’s US$36 trillion in debt. Long-dated US Treasury yields rose amid the fiscal worries, with the 30-year yield topping 5 percent and hitting its highest level since late 2023. Stocks were dealt another blow on Friday when US President Donald
UNCERTAINTY: Investors remain worried that trade negotiations with Washington could go poorly, given Trump’s inconsistency on tariffs in his second term, experts said The consumer confidence index this month fell for a ninth consecutive month to its lowest level in 13 months, as global trade uncertainties and tariff risks cloud Taiwan’s economic outlook, a survey released yesterday by National Central University found. The biggest decline came from the timing for stock investments, which plunged 11.82 points to 26.82, underscoring bleak investor confidence, it said. “Although the TAIEX reclaimed the 21,000-point mark after the US and China agreed to bury the hatchet for 90 days, investors remain worried that the situation would turn sour later,” said Dachrahn Wu (吳大任), director of the university’s Research Center for
RSS