The laundering of US$81 million stolen from Bangladesh’s reserves through the Philippines could threaten the wider financial sector and put the country’s credit rating at risk, the lawmaker heading the government investigation of the case said.
“If you push the consequences, the Philippines could become blacklisted as a money-laundering haven, our credit ratings could go down and the cost of doing business could go up,” Philippine Senator Teofisto Guingona, who previously led government investigations on corruption that led to the indictment of lawmakers, said in an interview on Thursday. “If we don’t handle this properly, it will affect us all.”
The government is probing how money stolen from Bangladesh’s central bank was withdrawn from accounts set up at Rizal Commercial Banking Corp and cashed out at casinos after passing through a local money changer, Philrem Service Corp.
Photo: Reuters
The case has prompted central banks around the world to examine cybersecurity measures, and triggered the resignation of Bangladesh’s central bank governor.
Authorities have blocked most of the illicit transfers and US$20 million sent to Sri Lanka was returned, but almost all of the US$81 million withdrawn in the Philippines remains missing.
“There’s risk associated with this, and therefore we need to address that,” Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Governor Amando Tetangco told reporters in Manila yesterday. “We have to show that action has been taken.”
Rizal Bank is the nation’s eighth-largest lender with assets of 410.4 billion Philippine pesos (US$8.9 billion) as of September last year, according to central bank data. It is the sixth-largest in terms of capital.
Maia Santos Deguito, the manager of the Rizal Bank branch from which the US$81 million was withdrawn, has said she had approval from senior bank executives for the transfers.
Guingona said separately that at least two other senior executives of the bank may have been involved, without naming them. Deguito was the only branch manager in a network of 471 outlets who “committed serious violations of the bank’s systems, processes and controls,” the lender said in a statement.
“Rizal Bank failed as an institution,” Guingona said. “It’s either the branch or the headquarters that failed, but the point is, the bank failed. It could have been a system failure, human error or there was a conspiracy.”
The case is an isolated one and has nothing to do with the bank’s strength and stability, Rizal Bank said in the statement.
“RCBC follows global best practices but even the most stringent rules and restrictions are only as good as the people who must follow them,” Guingona said.
The bank’s internal investigation continues, Maria Celia Estavillo, Rizal Bank’s head of legal and regulatory affairs, said in a statement late on Thursday.
“Definitely we will sanction anybody found to be culpable within the bank,” Estavillo said.
Rizal Bank shares fell 0.8 percent at the close of trading in Manila on Friday, having dropped as much as 2.5 percent earlier. The Philippine benchmark stock index rose 1.3 percent.
The credit rating for the Philippines was raised to investment grade by Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poor’s in 2013.
It is now rated “BBB” by Standard & Poor’s and “Baa2” by Moody’s Investors Service, two levels above junk.
Fitch Ratings has the country at “BBB-,” one level above junk.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
A move by US President Donald Trump to slap a 25 percent tariff on all steel imports is expected to place Taiwan-made steel, which already has a 25 percent tariff, on an equal footing, the Taiwan Steel & Iron Industries Association said yesterday. Speaking with CNA, association chairman Hwang Chien-chih (黃建智) said such an equal footing is expected to boost Taiwan’s competitive edge against other countries in the US market, describing the tariffs as "positive" for Taiwanese steel exporters. On Monday, Trump signed two executive orders imposing the new metal tariffs on imported steel and aluminum with no exceptions and exemptions, effective