One year ago, Micromax Informatics Ltd vaulted past Samsung Electronics Co to become India’s leading smartphone brand. Today, its market share has nearly halved, several top executives have resigned and the company is looking for growth outside India.
In Micromax’s slide to second place is a tale of the promise and peril of India’s booming, but hypercompetitive smartphone industry.
India is the world’s fastest-growing smartphone market. Shipments of smartphones jumped 29 percent to 103 million units last year.
Rapid growth has helped nurture a crop of local brands, led by Micromax, that outsourced production to Chinese manufacturers. Now, as Samsung rolls out more affordable mobile phones, the same Chinese factories are entering the Indian market with their own brands, depressing prices and forcing Indian mobile phone makers to rethink their strategies.
“What the Indian brands did to the global brands two years ago, Chinese phone makers are doing the same to Indian brands now, and over the next year we see tremendous competition for Micromax and other Indian smartphone makers,” Counterpoint Research analyst Tarun Pathak said.
Micromax, which was founded in New Delhi by four partners in 2000, but only began selling mobile phones in 2008, built its market share by working with Chinese manufacturers such as Coolpad Group Ltd (酷派), Gionee Communication Equipment Co (金立) and Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp (歐珀移動) to offer affordable mobile phones quickly. Last year, it launched more than 40 new models.
In 2014, the founders brought in outside managers to lead the company at a time when Micromax was challenging Samsung to become the largest mobile phone maker in India.
However, tensions arose soon after between founders and the newly hired executives, six former executives told Reuters. These conflicts undermined Micromax’s attempts to raise funds for expansion, former executives said.
In May last year, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (阿里巴巴) walked away from a mooted US$1.2 billion purchase of a 20 percent stake, citing a lack of clarity on growth plans, according to one executive involved in the discussion.
Micromax cofounder Vikas Jain said in an interview with media this week that the company and Alibaba disagreed on a future roadmap.
Alibaba declined to comment.
Former executives said the lack of fresh funding undermined a proposal by the new executives to move Micromax’s research and design operations, which had previously been outsourced, in-house. The move was intended to help Micromax differentiate itself from generic Android clones.
“We hired about 80 to 90 people in Bangalore to do in-house software and design, but with no money from the investors and little interest from the founders, that team fizzled away and that office has been partially shut down now,” a former executive said.
After Alibaba walked away, Micromax struggled to attract other investors who would have been key to Micromax’s plan to invest in software research and development and hardware design. The company was forced to scale down the in-house research and development project, a top executive involved in the fundraising plan said.
At least five senior executives have resigned since November last year. The latest was Vineet Taneja, chief executive since 2014, who quit last week.
Meanwhile, Chinese handset makers, including Coolpad and Oppo, to which Micromax outsources its manufacturing, were sharpening their focus on India. Samsung, too, began to introduce more affordable models there.
Last year, Chinese brands doubled their market share to 18 percent, Counterpoint Research said, taking away business from Indian budget mobile phone makers, such as Micromax, Intex Technologies Ltd, Lava International Ltd and Karbonn Mobiles. Indian brands’ market share fell from 48 percent to 43 percent last year.
“Right now the whole industry is suffering because of the Chinese phones,” Jain said. “We have seen large write-downs happening on inventory in China and that inventory is being passed on to India at a markdown.”
Chinese mobile phone makers including LeEco (樂視), Xiaomi Corp (小米) and Lenovo Group Ltd (聯想) have also partnered with e-commerce companies including Amazon India and Flipkart to sell mobile phones directly to consumers, saving on distribution and sales and reaching new online shoppers directly.
In the final quarter of last year, Micromax’s shipments fell by 12.1 percent, against growth of 15.4 percent for the sector, according to industry tracker International Data Corp (IDC). Micromax’s share of the smartphone market fell to 13 percent in the fourth quarter from 22 percent at its peak in 2014, IDC said.
Micromax, which is privately held and does not disclose financial information, maintains it is profitable. Founders Jain, Rahul Sharma, Rajesh Agarwal and Sumeet Arora still control about 80 percent of the company. They have raised nearly US$90 million from investors in the last five years.
Facing competition from both Samsung and inexpensive Chinese mobile phones, Micromax plans to increase production in India. Jain said that the company plans to double local manufacturing output from 1.5 million units to about 3 million units a month over the next six to 12 months.
Already a top-10 brand in Russia, Micromax is seeking a partner to help it expand further outside India and diversify into televisions and tablets.
“Micromax needs to diversify geographically and also needs to diversify product lines,” said Neil Mawston, executive director of the global wireless practice at London-based research consultancy Strategy Analytics.
How well it manages that diversification will be key, Mawston said.
SEEKING CLARITY: Washington should not adopt measures that create uncertainties for ‘existing semiconductor investments,’ TSMC said referring to its US$165 billion in the US Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) told the US that any future tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors could reduce demand for chips and derail its pledge to increase its investment in Arizona. “New import restrictions could jeopardize current US leadership in the competitive technology industry and create uncertainties for many committed semiconductor capital projects in the US, including TSMC Arizona’s significant investment plan in Phoenix,” the chipmaker wrote in a letter to the US Department of Commerce. TSMC issued the warning in response to a solicitation for comments by the department on a possible tariff on semiconductor imports by US President Donald Trump’s
The government has launched a three-pronged strategy to attract local and international talent, aiming to position Taiwan as a new global hub following Nvidia Corp’s announcement that it has chosen Taipei as the site of its Taiwan headquarters. Nvidia cofounder and CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) on Monday last week announced during his keynote speech at the Computex trade show in Taipei that the Nvidia Constellation, the company’s planned Taiwan headquarters, would be located in the Beitou-Shilin Technology Park (北投士林科技園區) in Taipei. Huang’s decision to establish a base in Taiwan is “primarily due to Taiwan’s talent pool and its strength in the semiconductor
Industrial production expanded 22.31 percent annually last month to 107.51, as increases in demand for high-performance computing (HPC) and artificial intelligence (AI) applications drove demand for locally-made chips and components. The manufacturing production index climbed 23.68 percent year-on-year to 108.37, marking the 14th consecutive month of increase, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said. In the first four months of this year, industrial and manufacturing production indices expanded 14.31 percent and 15.22 percent year-on-year, ministry data showed. The growth momentum is to extend into this month, with the manufacturing production index expected to rise between 11 percent and 15.1 percent annually, Department of Statistics
An earnings report from semiconductor giant and artificial intelligence (AI) bellwether Nvidia Corp takes center stage for Wall Street this week, as stocks hit a speed bump of worries over US federal deficits driving up Treasury yields. US equities pulled back last week after a torrid rally, as investors turned their attention to tax and spending legislation poised to swell the US government’s US$36 trillion in debt. Long-dated US Treasury yields rose amid the fiscal worries, with the 30-year yield topping 5 percent and hitting its highest level since late 2023. Stocks were dealt another blow on Friday when US President Donald
RSS