Travelers easily whiz from city to city on high-speed trains in many parts of South America, Asia and Europe. Since the first high-speed lines began operating more than 50 years ago in Japan, they have become an essential part of transportation worldwide.
Yet the US has never built a single stretch of high-speed rail, which is generally defined as accommodating trains that go at least 321kph and proposals to do so have been thwarted for decades.
So what is holding the US back?
Photo: AP
For starters, a much larger land mass, longer distances between major cities and the high cost of construction. Other factors include efficient air travel, relatively low prices for gasoline and a car-based culture.
“The challenge in America is the scale of America,” said Robert Eckels, chief executive of the Texas Central High Speed Railway, a private venture that is planning a bullet train between Dallas and Houston, Texas.
In recent decades, political pressure against bullet trains has come from conservatives, who argue that such systems should acquire private financial backing and prove that their operations will at a minimum be cost-neutral. It is a burden state and federal governments do not place on other huge transportation projects, such as freeways and airports.
For now, the best the country can do is Amtrak’s Acela, which reaches speeds of up to 240kph on a busy route between Washington and Boston.
In an effort to jump-start high-speed rail, the administration of US President Barack Obama in 2009 awarded US$7 billion for projects in California, Florida and Wisconsin. Republican governors in Florida and Wisconsin rejected the funding and backed out of high-speed rail plans, sending more of those dollars to California.
The list of other proposals for faster-speed rail includes: linking Las Vegas with greater Los Angeles; Chicago with St Louis; Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, with Pittsburgh; Oklahoma City with Tulsa; and upgrading track on a medium-speed line between Miami and Orlando.
Despite the political resistance and financial hurdles, two projects have moved beyond the conceptual phase. One is California’s US$68 billion plan for a high-speed rail network connecting northern and southern California. The other is the privately financed plan in central Texas.
California’s long-term financing plan relies heavily on federal money that is unlikely to materialize in a Republican-controlled US Congress, but Democratic Governor Jerry Brown remains a strong supporter, negotiating a dedicated funding stream through a separate program that raises money from businesses as part of an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The Texas project has received much less publicity than California’s, yet it could become the nation’s first operating bullet train line.
Private-public partnerships in construction may be the best way to mute political criticism, as well as kick-start the projects, said Andrew Goetz, a professor and faculty associate who studies high-speed rail at the Intermodal Transportation Institute at the University of Denver.
Rail proponents argue that the lack of high-speed rail has hurt US competitiveness. The typical US business traveler spends two days of travel to attend one meeting, said Andy Kunz, president and chief executive of the US High Speed Rail Association.
“We’re stuck in traffic for hours. We’re dealing with horrible airlines as it deteriorates,” Kunz said. “The whole country is getting shortchanged by this.”
‘SWASTICAR’: Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s close association with Donald Trump has prompted opponents to brand him a ‘Nazi’ and resulted in a dramatic drop in sales Demonstrators descended on Tesla Inc dealerships across the US, and in Europe and Canada on Saturday to protest company chief Elon Musk, who has amassed extraordinary power as a top adviser to US President Donald Trump. Waving signs with messages such as “Musk is stealing our money” and “Reclaim our country,” the protests largely took place peacefully following fiery episodes of vandalism on Tesla vehicles, dealerships and other facilities in recent weeks that US officials have denounced as terrorism. Hundreds rallied on Saturday outside the Tesla dealership in Manhattan. Some blasted Musk, the world’s richest man, while others demanded the shuttering of his
ADVERSARIES: The new list includes 11 entities in China and one in Taiwan, which is a local branch of Chinese cloud computing firm Inspur Group The US added dozens of entities to a trade blacklist on Tuesday, the US Department of Commerce said, in part to disrupt Beijing’s artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced computing capabilities. The action affects 80 entities from countries including China, the United Arab Emirates and Iran, with the commerce department citing their “activities contrary to US national security and foreign policy.” Those added to the “entity list” are restricted from obtaining US items and technologies without government authorization. “We will not allow adversaries to exploit American technology to bolster their own militaries and threaten American lives,” US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said. The entities
Taiwan’s official purchasing managers’ index (PMI) last month rose 0.2 percentage points to 54.2, in a second consecutive month of expansion, thanks to front-loading demand intended to avoid potential US tariff hikes, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. While short-term demand appeared robust, uncertainties rose due to US President Donald Trump’s unpredictable trade policy, CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) told a news conference in Taipei. Taiwan’s economy this year would be characterized by high-level fluctuations and the volatility would be wilder than most expect, Lien said Demand for electronics, particularly semiconductors, continues to benefit from US technology giants’ effort
Minister of Finance Chuang Tsui-yun (莊翠雲) yesterday told lawmakers that she “would not speculate,” but a “response plan” has been prepared in case Taiwan is targeted by US President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, which are to be announced on Wednesday next week. The Trump administration, including US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, has said that much of the proposed reciprocal tariffs would focus on the 15 countries that have the highest trade surpluses with the US. Bessent has referred to those countries as the “dirty 15,” but has not named them. Last year, Taiwan’s US$73.9 billion trade surplus with the US
RSS