Mon, Jun 29, 2015 page15

• Popular elsewhere, high-speed rail fails to take hold in US

  • AP, SACRAMENTO, California
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Travelers easily whiz from city to city on high-speed trains in many parts of South America, Asia and Europe. Since the first high-speed lines began operating more than 50 years ago in Japan, they have become an essential part of transportation worldwide.

  Yet the US has never built a single stretch of high-speed rail, which is generally defined as accommodating trains that go at least 321kph and proposals to do so have been thwarted for decades.

  So what is holding the US back?

  

  A full-scale mock-up of a high-speed train is displayed at the Capitol in Sacramento, California, on Feb. 26.

  Photo: AP

  For starters, a much larger land mass, longer distances between major cities and the high cost of construction. Other factors include efficient air travel, relatively low prices for gasoline and a car-based culture.

  “The challenge in America is the scale of America,” said Robert Eckels, chief executive of the Texas Central High Speed Railway, a private venture that is planning a bullet train between Dallas and Houston, Texas.

  In recent decades, political pressure against bullet trains has come from conservatives, who argue that such systems should acquire private financial backing and prove that their operations will at a minimum be cost-neutral. It is a burden state and federal governments do not place on other huge transportation projects, such as freeways and airports.

  For now, the best the country can do is Amtrak’s Acela, which reaches speeds of up to 240kph on a busy route between Washington and Boston.

  In an effort to jump-start high-speed rail, the administration of US President Barack Obama in 2009 awarded US$7 billion for projects in California, Florida and Wisconsin. Republican governors in Florida and Wisconsin rejected the funding and backed out of high-speed rail plans, sending more of those dollars to California.

  The list of other proposals for faster-speed rail includes: linking Las Vegas with greater Los Angeles; Chicago with St Louis; Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, with Pittsburgh; Oklahoma City with Tulsa; and upgrading track on a medium-speed line between Miami and Orlando.

  Despite the political resistance and financial hurdles, two projects have moved beyond the conceptual phase. One is California’s US$68 billion plan for a high-speed rail network connecting northern and southern California. The other is the privately financed plan in central Texas.

  California’s long-term financing plan relies heavily on federal money that is unlikely to materialize in a Republican-controlled US Congress, but Democratic Governor Jerry Brown remains a strong supporter, negotiating a dedicated funding stream through a separate program that raises money from businesses as part of an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

  The Texas project has received much less publicity than California’s, yet it could become the nation’s first operating bullet train line.

  Private-public partnerships in construction may be the best way to mute political criticism, as well as kick-start the projects, said Andrew Goetz, a professor and faculty associate who studies high-speed rail at the Intermodal Transportation Institute at the University of Denver.

  Rail proponents argue that the lack of high-speed rail has hurt US competitiveness. The typical US business traveler spends two days of travel to attend one meeting, said Andy Kunz, president and chief executive of the US High Speed Rail Association.

  “We’re stuck in traffic for hours. We’re dealing with horrible airlines as it deteriorates,” Kunz said. “The whole country is getting shortchanged by this.”
• Most Popular

  • 1

    LA Dodgers show off World Series rings

  • 2

    Hong Kong Sevens settles into new Kai Tak Stadium

  • 3

    Homeless Sudan club defy odds in CAF Champions

  • 4

    Dodgers edge Tigers and Yankees beat Brewers in opening games in the US

  • 5

    Michkov key as Flyers beat Predators