Alongside its global reputation as a peacemaker and generous foreign aid donor, Sweden has become a major supplier of weapons and counts a number of regimes criticized for human rights abuses among its customers.
Ranked as the world’s third-largest arms exporter per capita after Israel and Russia, Sweden’s booming defense industry has stirred up ethical concerns among Swedes about some of the countries it is doing business with.
At a hangar in Sweden’s military-industrial complex, Saab AB technicians are building an assembly line for the next generation of Gripen fighters, which are equipped with state-of-the-art warfare systems and larger weapons bays, and at least 60 of which are for the Swedish Air Force.
Photo: AFP
The Gripen E is designed to stand up to Russia’s best warplanes and boasts a unique networking system that allows the planes to communicate and divide up tasks such as detecting, electronic jamming and firing, Saab operations chief Lars Ydreskog said at the company’s plant in Linkoeping, southern Sweden.
“It was this tactical way of working that was noticed by Brazil and Switzerland,” he said, referring Saab’s fighter jet beating out stiff French and US competition, even though Swiss voters ultimately rejected a deal for 22 Gripens in a referendum last weekend.
Saab and other Sweden-based firms, including BAE Systems AB and Bofors, have been hugely successful in the 2000s, selling weapons and defense material to 55 countries to the tune of US$1.8 billion over the previous year.
Amid the boom, critics charge that Sweden has become more inclined to arm regimes accused of human rights abuses, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Pakistan, as demand from Western nations has ebbed.
“Swedes see themselves as very ethical and restrictive when it comes to giving human rights violators or dictators things that help them stay in power, but the reality is that [that] has happened,” said Siemon Wezeman, an arms expert at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
“In the last decade or so, they’ve been more open to it, because those are the markets,” he added. “In the past they wouldn’t have done business with Saudi Arabia due to human rights concerns — it’s obviously a place that rings all kinds of alarm bells — but that has changed... They’ve sold them Eriye [radar tracking systems] and anti-tank missiles, and marketed other weapons there.”
Other sales have been clandestine. In 2012, the country’s public radio revealed that the Swedish Defence Research Agency has provided Riyadh with covert technical support for a missile factory, leading to the resignation of a minister of defense and a probe into new ethical criteria for weapons sales.
One of Sweden’s most polemic exports, the Saab-made Carl Gustav rocket launcher used by the US and other armies has reportedly fallen into the hands of groups that Stockholm would not normally trade with, including the Burmese military and Islamist extremists al-Shabaab in Somalia.
Peace activist Martin Smedjeback said that Sweden’s original reason for developing a large weapons industry — the desire to be self sufficient and independent — has vanished, along with the country’s policy of neutrality as it develops closer ties to NATO.
“Politicians raise the issue of jobs and technology because there are all these other arguments that they cannot use, like: ‘It’s macho and I like macho things,’” he said. “And they also can’t say that the weapons industry is powerful and they have influence over the decisions of politicians.”
Several leading defense analysts argue that Sweden could buy defense material more cheaply and efficiently abroad, but that commercial interests stand in the way.
“The Swedish government, like many others, knows that advanced defense industry technology will spill over to other areas,” said Gunnar Hult, deputy head of military studies at the National Defense College. “And the jobs issue is quite big. People care more about local jobs than about what we do in Saudi [Arabia].”
About 30,000 people are employed in the country’s defense industry, many of them in towns where arms factories are the largest private-sector employer.
Hult believes that, at times, Sweden’s foreign policy becomes entwined with commercial arms export interests, citing the nation’s participation in enforcing a NATO no-fly zone over Libya in 2011.
“Our participation in the Libya campaign was quite beneficial to the Gripen. This is something no politician would ever admit, but it’s true. People saw it participating in air campaigns. It’s good for business,” he said.
Allan Widman, a member of governing center-right coalition the Alliance, said governments have had good reason to focus state support on two particular sectors: jet fighters and submarines.
“I think we’ve had this strategic idea in Sweden that these two weapons represent our national security interests,” he said. “I think there’s a view among politicians in Sweden that defense technology and industry represents [one] ... of the most essential parts of the Swedish economy.”
Yet many defense analysts and peace activists reject that view, arguing that weapons represent just 1 percent of the Nordic country’s total exports and that government support is more a question of national pride, particularly when it comes to selling Saab fighter jets.
“Saab is seen as one of the crown jewels of Sweden,” Wezeman said. “There is a strong feeling of pride and nationalism — that this is a good Swedish product — they’re proud of it and that plays a major role.”
US PROBE: The Information reported that the US Department of Commerce is investigating whether the firm made advanced chips for China’s Huawei Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s largest contract maker of advanced chips, yesterday said it is a law-abiding company, and is committed to complying with all applicable laws and regulations including export controls. The Hsinchu-based chip giant issued the statement after US news Web site The Information ran a story saying that the US Department of Commerce has launched a probe into TSMC over whether it breached export rules by making smartphone or artificial intelligence (AI) chips for China’s Huawei Technologies Co (華為). “We maintain a robust and comprehensive export system for monitoring and ensuring compliance,” the statement said. “If we
DEMAND FOR AI CHIPS: Net income in the third quarter surged 31.2% quarter-on-quarter to NT$325.26 billion, the strongest quarterly return in the company’s history Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, yesterday raised its revenue forecast to annual growth of 30 percent this year, thanks to strong and sustainable demand for artificial intelligence (AI) processors for servers. It was the second upward adjustment from 25 percent year-on-year growth estimated three months ago, despite recent concerns about whether the AI boom could be another technology bubble. “The demand is real. It’s real. And I believe it is just the beginning of this demand. Alright, so one of my key customers said the demand right now is ‘insane,’” TSMC chairman and chief executive C.C.
Starbucks Corp might have the more recognizable name, but 7-Eleven’s City Cafe remains the king of Taiwan’s fresh coffee market, helped by the convenience store chain’s extensive market presence and product diversification. President Chain Store Corp (PCSC, 統一超商), which runs both the 7-Eleven and Starbucks store chains in Taiwan, established the City Cafe brand in 2004. The brand took off when actress Gwei Lun-mei (桂綸鎂) became its spokesperson in 2007. City Cafe’s sales exceeded NT$10 billion (US$311.69 million) for the first time in 2015, surpassing the revenue of Starbucks Taiwan, and rose to more than NT$17 billion last year, exceeding the NT$14.98
COUNTRY-BASED: Setting ceilings on sales of the technology would tighten limits that originally targeted China’s ambitions in artificial intelligence amid security risks US officials have discussed capping sales of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips from Nvidia Corp and other American companies on a country-specific basis, people familiar with the matter said, a move that would limit some nations’ AI capabilities. The new approach would set a ceiling on export licenses for some countries in the interest of national security, according to the people, who described the private discussions on condition of anonymity. Officials in the administration of US President Joe Biden focused on Persian Gulf countries that have a growing appetite for AI data centers and the deep pockets to fund them, the people