When President Bush declared on Monday that the nation was waking up with a hangover after the economic boom of the last decade, he could not have known how much more pain was on the way. By week's end the stock market had plunged a further 7 percent, reaching lows it had not seen since 1998.
One of the week's biggest losers was AOL Time Warner, a company whose stock has been in virtual free fall all year. In an attempt to turn around its own flagging fortunes, AOL Time Warner announced a major management shake-up, designed to take the company in a new direction and undo the damage of a merger that now stands as one of the biggest blunders in corporate history.
Of all the giddy corporate moves of the 1990s, none now look more wrongheaded than Time Warner's decision to sell itself to AOL in a deal that put a higher value on the now-struggling Internet service than on Time Warner's vast stable of blue-chip media properties. After years of fumbling to come up with an online strategy, Time Warner decided to thrust itself into the New Economy by combining with AOL. Unfortunately for Time Warner shareholders, the CEO, Gerald Levin, chose precisely the wrong time to make his move.
With AOL stock near its peak, he accepted a deal in which his shareholders were given just 45 percent of the combined company, even though Time Warner's divisions produced some 80 percent of the revenues.
The credo of the combined AOL Time Warner was synergy, the idea that the companies would be greater than the sum of their parts because each of the divisions would help market the others. But the dream never materialized. The fast-growing AOL online service was supposed to be the juggernaut that would cause the whole company to grow at 30 percent a year. It turned out that AOL was unable to sustain its own growth rate, much less carry Time Warner.
AOL Time Warner has taken a beating since the two companies combined. The stock has plummeted. In January management was forced to announce a US$54 billion goodwill write-down, a stunning admission of just how bad things had gotten. To turn things around, Stephen Case, the company chairman, and Richard Parsons, the newly installed CEO, will need to win back the trust of Wall Street.
With this week's personnel changes, Parsons -- who himself came from Time Warner -- forcefully reasserted the dominance of Time Warner culture within the merged companies. He accepted the resignation of the chief operating officer, Robert Pittman, who came from the AOL side, and divided Pittman's job between Don Logan, head of the Time Inc. magazine division, and Jeff Bewkes, chairman of HBO. Tellingly, the AOL online division will now report to Logan, who has spent his career in print and once said the Internet gave "new meaning to the term `black hole.'"
Logan and Bewkes are expected to decentralize operations and emphasize strong media content.
Shareholders may welcome the new direction. Still, two new appointments do not make a turnaround.
Parsons has yet to enunciate a clear vision of where he wants to take AOL Time Warner.
Before anyone gets too excited about the restoration of Time Warner culture, it is worth remembering that it was Time Warner management that blundered into the AOL deal in the first place.
ISSUES: Gogoro has been struggling with ballooning losses and was recently embroiled in alleged subsidy fraud, using Chinese-made components instead of locally made parts Gogoro Inc (睿能創意), the nation’s biggest electric scooter maker, yesterday said that its chairman and CEO Horace Luke (陸學森) has resigned amid chronic losses and probes into the company’s alleged involvement in subsidy fraud. The board of directors nominated Reuntex Group (潤泰集團) general counsel Tamon Tseng (曾夢達) as the company’s new chairman, Gogoro said in a statement. Ruentex is Gogoro’s biggest stakeholder. Gogoro Taiwan general manager Henry Chiang (姜家煒) is to serve as acting CEO during the interim period, the statement said. Luke’s departure came as a bombshell yesterday. As a company founder, he has played a key role in pushing for the
CROSS-STRAIT TENSIONS: The US company could switch orders from TSMC to alternative suppliers, but that would lower chip quality, CEO Jensen Huang said Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), whose products have become the hottest commodity in the technology world, on Wednesday said that the scramble for a limited amount of supply has frustrated some customers and raised tensions. “The demand on it is so great, and everyone wants to be first and everyone wants to be most,” he told the audience at a Goldman Sachs Group Inc technology conference in San Francisco. “We probably have more emotional customers today. Deservedly so. It’s tense. We’re trying to do the best we can.” Huang’s company is experiencing strong demand for its latest generation of chips, called
China has claimed a breakthrough in developing homegrown chipmaking equipment, an important step in overcoming US sanctions designed to thwart Beijing’s semiconductor goals. State-linked organizations are advised to use a new laser-based immersion lithography machine with a resolution of 65 nanometers or better, the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) said in an announcement this month. Although the note does not specify the supplier, the spec marks a significant step up from the previous most advanced indigenous equipment — developed by Shanghai Micro Electronics Equipment Group Co (SMEE, 上海微電子) — which stood at about 90 nanometers. MIIT’s claimed advances last
GLOBAL ECONOMY: Policymakers have a choice of a small 25 basis-point cut or a bold cut of 50 basis points, which would help the labor market, but might reignite inflation The US Federal Reserve is gearing up to announce its first interest rate cut in more than four years on Wednesday, with policymakers expected to debate how big a move to make less than two months before the US presidential election. Senior officials at the US central bank including Fed Chairman Jerome Powell have in recent weeks indicated that a rate cut is coming this month, as inflation eases toward the bank’s long-term target of two percent, and the labor market continues to cool. The Fed, which has a dual mandate from the US Congress to act independently to ensure