When President Bush declared on Monday that the nation was waking up with a hangover after the economic boom of the last decade, he could not have known how much more pain was on the way. By week's end the stock market had plunged a further 7 percent, reaching lows it had not seen since 1998.
One of the week's biggest losers was AOL Time Warner, a company whose stock has been in virtual free fall all year. In an attempt to turn around its own flagging fortunes, AOL Time Warner announced a major management shake-up, designed to take the company in a new direction and undo the damage of a merger that now stands as one of the biggest blunders in corporate history.
Of all the giddy corporate moves of the 1990s, none now look more wrongheaded than Time Warner's decision to sell itself to AOL in a deal that put a higher value on the now-struggling Internet service than on Time Warner's vast stable of blue-chip media properties. After years of fumbling to come up with an online strategy, Time Warner decided to thrust itself into the New Economy by combining with AOL. Unfortunately for Time Warner shareholders, the CEO, Gerald Levin, chose precisely the wrong time to make his move.
With AOL stock near its peak, he accepted a deal in which his shareholders were given just 45 percent of the combined company, even though Time Warner's divisions produced some 80 percent of the revenues.
The credo of the combined AOL Time Warner was synergy, the idea that the companies would be greater than the sum of their parts because each of the divisions would help market the others. But the dream never materialized. The fast-growing AOL online service was supposed to be the juggernaut that would cause the whole company to grow at 30 percent a year. It turned out that AOL was unable to sustain its own growth rate, much less carry Time Warner.
AOL Time Warner has taken a beating since the two companies combined. The stock has plummeted. In January management was forced to announce a US$54 billion goodwill write-down, a stunning admission of just how bad things had gotten. To turn things around, Stephen Case, the company chairman, and Richard Parsons, the newly installed CEO, will need to win back the trust of Wall Street.
With this week's personnel changes, Parsons -- who himself came from Time Warner -- forcefully reasserted the dominance of Time Warner culture within the merged companies. He accepted the resignation of the chief operating officer, Robert Pittman, who came from the AOL side, and divided Pittman's job between Don Logan, head of the Time Inc. magazine division, and Jeff Bewkes, chairman of HBO. Tellingly, the AOL online division will now report to Logan, who has spent his career in print and once said the Internet gave "new meaning to the term `black hole.'"
Logan and Bewkes are expected to decentralize operations and emphasize strong media content.
Shareholders may welcome the new direction. Still, two new appointments do not make a turnaround.
Parsons has yet to enunciate a clear vision of where he wants to take AOL Time Warner.
Before anyone gets too excited about the restoration of Time Warner culture, it is worth remembering that it was Time Warner management that blundered into the AOL deal in the first place.
‘SWASTICAR’: Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s close association with Donald Trump has prompted opponents to brand him a ‘Nazi’ and resulted in a dramatic drop in sales Demonstrators descended on Tesla Inc dealerships across the US, and in Europe and Canada on Saturday to protest company chief Elon Musk, who has amassed extraordinary power as a top adviser to US President Donald Trump. Waving signs with messages such as “Musk is stealing our money” and “Reclaim our country,” the protests largely took place peacefully following fiery episodes of vandalism on Tesla vehicles, dealerships and other facilities in recent weeks that US officials have denounced as terrorism. Hundreds rallied on Saturday outside the Tesla dealership in Manhattan. Some blasted Musk, the world’s richest man, while others demanded the shuttering of his
ADVERSARIES: The new list includes 11 entities in China and one in Taiwan, which is a local branch of Chinese cloud computing firm Inspur Group The US added dozens of entities to a trade blacklist on Tuesday, the US Department of Commerce said, in part to disrupt Beijing’s artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced computing capabilities. The action affects 80 entities from countries including China, the United Arab Emirates and Iran, with the commerce department citing their “activities contrary to US national security and foreign policy.” Those added to the “entity list” are restricted from obtaining US items and technologies without government authorization. “We will not allow adversaries to exploit American technology to bolster their own militaries and threaten American lives,” US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said. The entities
Taiwan’s official purchasing managers’ index (PMI) last month rose 0.2 percentage points to 54.2, in a second consecutive month of expansion, thanks to front-loading demand intended to avoid potential US tariff hikes, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. While short-term demand appeared robust, uncertainties rose due to US President Donald Trump’s unpredictable trade policy, CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) told a news conference in Taipei. Taiwan’s economy this year would be characterized by high-level fluctuations and the volatility would be wilder than most expect, Lien said Demand for electronics, particularly semiconductors, continues to benefit from US technology giants’ effort
Minister of Finance Chuang Tsui-yun (莊翠雲) yesterday told lawmakers that she “would not speculate,” but a “response plan” has been prepared in case Taiwan is targeted by US President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, which are to be announced on Wednesday next week. The Trump administration, including US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, has said that much of the proposed reciprocal tariffs would focus on the 15 countries that have the highest trade surpluses with the US. Bessent has referred to those countries as the “dirty 15,” but has not named them. Last year, Taiwan’s US$73.9 billion trade surplus with the US