Nothing had prepared Francois Ponchaud for his first glimpse of the nature of the Khmer Rouge's new order imposed on Phnom Penh in the immediate aftermath of the fall of the Cambodian capital on April 17, 1975.
In spite of the horrors borne from a decade of watching Cambodian society descend rapidly into a vicious downward spiral of violent civil conflict, the bizarre events unfolding in the street in front of the Jesuit missionary's residence appeared to defy all belief.
"Around one in the afternoon ... a hallucinatory spectacle began. Thousands of the sick and wounded were abandoning the city. The strongest dragged pitifully along, others were carried by friends, and some were lying on beds pushed by their families, with their plasma and IV bumping alongside. That s how the first evacuees left, about twenty thousand of them."
PHOTO: DANA LANGLOIS
The depopulating of Phnom Penh, which was to be followed in the days that followed by the forced evacuation of Cambodia's other urban centers, was the first indication that the worst was far from over for Cambodia and its people.
The stark images of Phnom Penh's 2.5 million residents being led out of the city at gunpoint by unsmiling, black-clad Khmer Rouge fighters who killed any and all who dared question their intentions dealt a decisive blow to the hopes shared by Ponchaud and other foreign residents and observers of Cambodia who had anticipated a Khmer Rouge victory as a deliverance from the corrupt brutality of Lon Nol's Khmer Republic.
"The evacuation was a stupidity ... a useless suffering for many, many people," Ponchaud recalled in an interview with the Taipei Times last week. "When the Khmer Rouge forced old people out [of Phnom Penh], I couldn't support it."
The evacuations -- the first step in the Khmer Rouge's attempt to transform Cambodia into a "hyper-Maoist" agrarian utopia that would eventually kill more than 1.5 million people -- came as a shock to Ponchaud, who had assumed that the desperate conditions endured by Cambodians under the Lon Nol regime could only improve under the KR.
"The Lon Nol regime [1970-1975] was very, very corrupt and there was no hope for the people ... the only hope was the coming of the Khmer Rouge," Ponchaud said. "We'd known since 1970 that when the Khmer Rouge [captured] a village, the killed the village chief, redistributed the land and took people to the forest, but we thought it was an effect of the war and when [the Khmer Rouge] had victory [their methods] would change."
Expelled from Cambodia after a harrowing three weeks of confinement to the grounds of Phnom Penh's French Embassy, Ponchaud did not have to wait long before accounts of the murderous reality of Democratic Kampuchea reached him through refugees who'd fled over the border.
"When in France I heard accounts of atrocities [by the Khmer Rouge], at first I didn't believe them," he said. "But later there were so many, and so similar in the details that I had to believe."
Ponchaud was moved to compile the stories of widespread murder and starvation in Democratic Kampuchea in a marathon three month writing session that produced Cambodia Year Zero.
Published in 1977 , Year Zero
was the first and most influential expose of the horror that everyday life in Cambodia had become under the Khmer Rouge.
"The book was written as an expression of solidarity with the Cambodian people who were suffering, but I had no hope that [the book] would change anything," he said. "The stories the refugees told me [in camps along
the Thai-Cambodian border] were terrifying, but the testimony I chose was not too horrific because I knew if it was too terrifying, Europeans simply would not believe it."
Ponchaud's Year Zero was influential in helping to reverse the reflexive expressions of support and sympathy the Khmer Rouge takeover evinced from left-leaning western intellectuals.
"Noam Chomsky [at the time] was very favorable to the Khmer Rouge and the Vietnamese communists, but when he read the book he said `I don't understand the Khmer Rouge," Ponchaud said. "Also in France many [leftist] writers changed their minds about the KR [after reading Year
Zero]."
Similarly unforeseen was the exploitation of Year Zero as a propaganda tool by the Vietnamese, a circumstance that led Ponchaud to cancel a planned second printing of the book in 1979.
"In 1978 when the Vietnamese were preparing the invasion or `liberation'
[of Cambodia], they translated the book into Vietnamese and read it on Hanoi Radio," Ponchaud said, shaking his head ruefully.
"So you see, I helped with the Vietnamese invasion."
While unequivocal in his condemnation of the outrages of Democratic Kampuchea, Ponchaud is equally adamant in assigning guilt to western leaders who aided and abetted the destruction of Cambodia and the rise and sustenance of the KR.
When asked in 1983 by the head of Amnesty International to participate in an eventual genocide tribunal of Pol Pot, Ponchaud agreed, but on one condition.
"Before Pol Pot I said we must judge Nixon and Kissinger and Carter ... they are bigger killers than Pol Pot," he insisted. "They destroyed Cambodia with their B52s and [beginning] in Jan 1979 supplied the Khmer Rouge and gave them money to fight the Vietnamese."
Ponchaud is also clearly distressed by the haunting parallels between contemporary Cambodia and the endemic corruption and widespread misery of Cambodians under the old Lon Nol regime.
"In my opinion, the Lon Nol regime was not worse than [modern Cambodia] ... in the Lon Nol period I never saw mothers sell their children the way mothers are forced to do nowadays," he said.
"The [current] government is lucky that the present ideological environment is different
[because] if the ideological environment was the same as it was in Cambodia in 1970, there[d be revolution now."
The implications of a possible tribunal for former Khmer Rouge leaders is also a source of concern for Ponchaud.
"If you want to judge the KR, I agree but you must judge all the KR including the [former] KR in power now, such as Prime Minister Hun Sen and you must also judge the people who killed 17 people on March 30, 1977," he said, in reference to the grenade attack on a Sam Rainsy Party demonstration outside Cambodia's National Assembly widely believed to have been perpetrated by bodyguards of Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen.
"But if you judge the acting leaders, there could be trouble, so maybe it's best to be quiet ... it may be impossible to find justice because sthere are too many people involved."
DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Taiwan shares the same values as those that fought in WWII, and nations must unite to halt the expansion of a new authoritarian bloc, Lai said The government yesterday held a commemoration ceremony for Victory in Europe (V-E) Day, joining the rest of the world for the first time to mark the anniversary of the end of World War II in Europe. Taiwan honoring V-E Day signifies “our growing connections with the international community,” President William Lai (賴清德) said at a reception in Taipei on the 80th anniversary of V-E Day. One of the major lessons of World War II is that “authoritarianism and aggression lead only to slaughter, tragedy and greater inequality,” Lai said. Even more importantly, the war also taught people that “those who cherish peace cannot
STEADFAST FRIEND: The bills encourage increased Taiwan-US engagement and address China’s distortion of UN Resolution 2758 to isolate Taiwan internationally The Presidential Office yesterday thanked the US House of Representatives for unanimously passing two Taiwan-related bills highlighting its solid support for Taiwan’s democracy and global participation, and for deepening bilateral relations. One of the bills, the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, requires the US Department of State to periodically review its guidelines for engagement with Taiwan, and report to the US Congress on the guidelines and plans to lift self-imposed limitations on US-Taiwan engagement. The other bill is the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which clarifies that UN Resolution 2758 does not address the issue of the representation of Taiwan or its people in
US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo on Friday expressed concern over the rate at which China is diversifying its military exercises, the Financial Times (FT) reported on Saturday. “The rates of change on the depth and breadth of their exercises is the one non-linear effect that I’ve seen in the last year that wakes me up at night or keeps me up at night,” Paparo was quoted by FT as saying while attending the annual Sedona Forum at the McCain Institute in Arizona. Paparo also expressed concern over the speed with which China was expanding its military. While the US
‘FALLACY’: Xi’s assertions that Taiwan was given to the PRC after WWII confused right and wrong, and were contrary to the facts, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday called Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) claim that China historically has sovereignty over Taiwan “deceptive” and “contrary to the facts.” In an article published on Wednesday in the Russian state-run Rossiyskaya Gazeta, Xi said that this year not only marks 80 years since the end of World War II and the founding of the UN, but also “Taiwan’s restoration to China.” “A series of instruments with legal effect under international law, including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Declaration have affirmed China’s sovereignty over Taiwan,” Xi wrote. “The historical and legal fact” of these documents, as well