The heads of Europe’s biggest economies met yesterday to try and forge a common position on the global financial crisis despite simmering disagreements over the way forward.
The British, French, Italian, Spanish and Dutch leaders gathered in the German capital to hammer out a European stance to take to a summit of the G20 developed and major developing countries in London on April 2.
The Berlin meeting came at the end of a week in which the economic crisis focused on central and eastern Europe, raising fears over the potential fallout among highly exposed banks in western Europe.
Squabbles over protectionism could also hinder efforts to present a united European front, with the European Commission voicing concern over proposed plans by France, Italy and Spain to shield their ailing auto sectors.
But French President Nicolas Sarkozy said he would not accept “a weak compromise, a cheap fix” in establishing the European position at the meeting hosted by German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
“The violence of the [economic] crisis, its depth, call for really profound changes. We have to start capitalism again from scratch, make it more moral ... that is why I want to see a real response [in Berlin],” Sarkozy said.
Merkel too turned up the heat ahead of the meeting, calling on Saturday for regulations and oversight of financial markets to be reinforced.
“There should be no more gaps” in international controls of financial products, the head of Europe’s largest economy said in her weekly video message.
Germany is pushing to reinforce rules for hedge funds and better rating systems to avoid repeats of meltdowns in the future.
German officials have also signaled their determination to have “exit strategies” ready for when the crisis begins to abate.
European officials suspect Britain’s resolve to tighten the regulation of markets may be waning, with London concerned that its position as Europe’s preeminent financial center could be undermined.
But British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said last week the world would see “unprecedented cooperation” over the next few months in addressing the financial crisis.
In a comment piece in The Observer yesterday, Brown called for a “reformed and more responsible banking system.”
“Banks must act in the long-term interests of their shareholders and therefore of the economy as a whole, not in the short-term interests of bankers,” Brown said. “That has to be the foundation on which a new system must be based.”
He advocated a rejection of “short-term bonus culture,” stronger governance in banks and better national and international regulation.
US President Barack Obama’s US$787 billion stimulus plan to jump-start the US economy has also raised fears in some European quarters over protectionism.
In public, European leaders are poised to repeat a commitment to avoid resorting to protectionism as a response to the world financial crisis.
MISINFORMATION: The generated content tends to adopt China’s official stance, such as ‘Taiwan is currently governed by the Chinese central government,’ the NSB said Five China-developed artificial intelligence (AI) language models exhibit cybersecurity risks and content biases, an inspection conducted by the National Security Bureau (NSB) showed. The five AI tools are: DeepSeek, Doubao (豆包), Yiyan (文心一言), Tongyi (通義千問) and Yuanbao (騰訊元寶), the bureau said, advising people to remain vigilant to protect personal data privacy and corporate business secrets. The NSB said it, in accordance with the National Intelligence Services Act (國家情報工作法), has reviewed international cybersecurity reports and intelligence, and coordinated with the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau and the National Police Agency’s Criminal Investigation Bureau to conduct an inspection of China-made AI language
LIMITS: While China increases military pressure on Taiwan and expands its use of cognitive warfare, it is unwilling to target tech supply chains, the report said US and Taiwan military officials have warned that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could implement a blockade within “a matter of hours” and need only “minimal conversion time” prior to an attack on Taiwan, a report released on Tuesday by the US Senate’s China Economic and Security Review Commission said. “While there is no indication that China is planning an imminent attack, the United States and its allies and partners can no longer assume that a Taiwan contingency is a distant possibility for which they would have ample time to prepare,” it said. The commission made the comments in its annual
CHECKING BOUNDARIES: China wants to disrupt solidarity among democracies and test their red lines, but it is instead pushing nations to become more united, an expert said The US Department of State on Friday expressed deep concern over a Chinese public security agency’s investigation into Legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) for “secession.” “China’s actions threaten free speech and erode norms that have underpinned the cross-strait ‘status quo’ for decades,” a US Department of State spokesperson said. The Chongqing Municipal Public Security Bureau late last month listed Shen as “wanted” and launched an investigation into alleged “secession-related” criminal activities, including his founding of the Kuma Academy, a civil defense organization that prepares people for an invasion by China. The spokesperson said that the US was “deeply concerned” about the bureau investigating Shen
‘TROUBLEMAKER’: Most countries believe that it is China — rather than Taiwan — that is undermining regional peace and stability with its coercive tactics, the president said China should restrain itself and refrain from being a troublemaker that sabotages peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks after China Coast Guard vessels sailed into disputed waters off the Senkaku Islands — known as the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) in Taiwan — following a remark Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made regarding Taiwan. Takaichi during a parliamentary session on Nov. 7 said that a “Taiwan contingency” involving a Chinese naval blockade could qualify as a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan, and trigger Tokyo’s deployment of its military for defense. Asked about the escalating tensions